BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Kanat Tangwongsan

Kanat Tangwongsan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingDatabasesNumerical AnalysisSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Parallel Triangle Counting in Massive Streaming Graphs

The number of triangles in a graph is a fundamental metric, used in social network analysis, link classification and recommendation, and more. Driven by these applications and the trend that modern graph datasets are both large and dynamic, we present the design and implementation of a fast and cache-efficient parallel algorithm for estimating the number of triangles in a massive undirected graph whose edges arrive as a stream. It brings together the benefits of streaming algorithms and parallel algorithms. By building on the streaming algorithms framework, the algorithm has a small memory footprint. By leveraging the paralell cache-oblivious framework, it makes efficient use of the memory hierarchy of modern multicore machines without needing to know its specific parameters. We prove theoretical bounds on accuracy, memory access cost, and parallel runtime complexity, as well as showing empirically that the algorithm yields accurate results and substantial speedups compared to an optimized sequential implementation. (This is an expanded version of a CIKM'13 paper of the same title.)

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Near Linear-Work Parallel SDD Solvers, Low-Diameter Decomposition, and Low-Stretch Subgraphs

We present the design and analysis of a near linear-work parallel algorithm for solving symmetric diagonally dominant (SDD) linear systems. On input of a SDD $n$-by-$n$ matrix $A$ with $m$ non-zero entries and a vector $b$, our algorithm computes a vector $\tilde{x}$ such that $\norm[A]{\tilde{x} - A^+b} \leq \vareps \cdot \norm[A]{A^+b}$ in $O(m\log^{O(1)}{n}\log{\frac1ε})$ work and $O(m^{1/3+θ}\log \frac1ε)$ depth for any fixed $θ> 0$. The algorithm relies on a parallel algorithm for generating low-stretch spanning trees or spanning subgraphs. To this end, we first develop a parallel decomposition algorithm that in polylogarithmic depth and $\otilde(|E|)$ work, partitions a graph into components with polylogarithmic diameter such that only a small fraction of the original edges are between the components. This can be used to generate low-stretch spanning trees with average stretch $O(n^α)$ in $O(n^{1+α})$ work and $O(n^α)$ depth. Alternatively, it can be used to generate spanning subgraphs with polylogarithmic average stretch in $\otilde(|E|)$ work and polylogarithmic depth. We apply this subgraph construction to derive a parallel linear system solver. By using this solver in known applications, our results imply improved parallel randomized algorithms for several problems, including single-source shortest paths, maximum flow, minimum-cost flow, and approximate maximum flow.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Parallel Approximation Algorithms for Facility-Location Problems

This paper presents the design and analysis of parallel approximation algorithms for facility-location problems, including $\NC$ and $\RNC$ algorithms for (metric) facility location, $k$-center, $k$-median, and $k$-means. These problems have received considerable attention during the past decades from the approximation algorithms community, concentrating primarily on improving the approximation guarantees. In this paper, we ask, is it possible to parallelize some of the beautiful results from the sequential setting? Our starting point is a small, but diverse, subset of results in approximation algorithms for facility-location problems, with a primary goal of developing techniques for devising their efficient parallel counterparts. We focus on giving algorithms with low depth, near work efficiency (compared to the sequential versions), and low cache complexity. Common in algorithms we present is the idea that instead of picking only the most cost-effective element, we make room for parallelism by allowing a small slack (e.g., a $(1+\vareps)$ factor) in what can be selected---then, we use a clean-up step to ensure that the behavior does not deviate too much from the sequential steps. All the algorithms we developed are ``cache efficient'' in that the cache complexity is bounded by $O(w/B)$, where $w$ is the work in the EREW model and $B$ is the block size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access