BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Guy E. Blelloch

Guy E. Blelloch contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and AlgorithmsDatabases

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Practically and Theoretically Efficient Garbage Collection for Multiversioning

Multiversioning is widely used in databases, transactional memory, and concurrent data structures. It can be used to support read-only transactions that appear atomic in the presence of concurrent update operations. Any system that maintains multiple versions of each object needs a way of efficiently reclaiming them. We experimentally compare various existing reclamation techniques by applying them to a multiversion tree and a multiversion hash table. Using insights from these experiments, we develop two new multiversion garbage collection (MVGC) techniques. These techniques use two novel concurrent version list data structures. Our experimental evaluation shows that our fastest technique is competitive with the fastest existing MVGC techniques, while using significantly less space on some workloads. Our new techniques provide strong theoretical bounds, especially on space usage. These bounds ensure that the schemes have consistent performance, avoiding the very high worst-case space usage of other techniques.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Lock-Free Locks Revisited

This paper presents a new and practical approach to lock-free locks based on helping, which allows the user to write code using fine-grained locks, but run it in a lock-free manner. Although lock-free locks have been suggested in the past, they are widely viewed as impractical, have some key limitations, and, as far as we know, have never been implemented. The paper presents some key techniques that make lock-free locks practical and more general. The most important technique is an approach to idempotence -- i.e. making code that runs multiple times appear as if it ran once. The idea is based on using a shared log among processes running the same protected code. Importantly, the approach can be library based, requiring very little if any change to standard code -- code just needs to use the idempotent versions of memory operations (load, store, LL/SC, allocation, free). We have implemented a C++ library called Flock based on the ideas. Flock allows lock-based data structures to run in either lock-free or blocking (traditional locks) mode. We implemented a variety of tree and list-based data structures with Flock and compare the performance of the lock-free and blocking modes under a variety of workloads. The lock-free mode is almost as fast as blocking mode under almost all workloads, and significantly faster when threads are oversubscribed (more threads than processors). We also compare with several existing lock-based and lock-free alternatives.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

PaC-trees: Supporting Parallel and Compressed Purely-Functional Collections

Many modern programming languages are shifting toward a functional style for collection interfaces such as sets, maps, and sequences. Functional interfaces offer many advantages, including being safe for parallelism and providing simple and lightweight snapshots. However, existing high-performance functional interfaces such as PAM, which are based on balanced purely-functional trees, incur large space overheads for large-scale data analysis due to storing every element in a separate node in a tree. This paper presents PaC-trees, a purely-functional data structure supporting functional interfaces for sets, maps, and sequences that provides a significant reduction in space over existing approaches. A PaC-tree is a balanced binary search tree which blocks the leaves and compresses the blocks using arrays. We provide novel techniques for compressing and uncompressing the blocks which yield practical parallel functional algorithms for a broad set of operations on PaC-trees such as union, intersection, filter, reduction, and range queries which are both theoretically and practically efficient. Using PaC-trees we designed CPAM, a C++ library that implements the full functionality of PAM, while offering significant extra functionality for compression. CPAM consistently matches or outperforms PAM on a set of microbenchmarks on sets, maps, and sequences while using about a quarter of the space. On applications including inverted indices, 2D range queries, and 1D interval queries, CPAM is competitive with or faster than PAM, while using 2.1--7.8x less space. For static and streaming graph processing, CPAM offers 1.6x faster batch updates while using 1.3--2.6x less space than the state-of-the-art graph processing system Aspen.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Turning Manual Concurrent Memory Reclamation into Automatic Reference Counting

Safe memory reclamation (SMR) schemes are an essential tool for lock-free data structures and concurrent programming. However, manual SMR schemes are notoriously difficult to apply correctly, and automatic schemes, such as reference counting, have been argued for over a decade to be too slow for practical purposes. A recent wave of work has disproved this long-held notion and shown that reference counting can be as scalable as hazard pointers, one of the most common manual techniques. Despite these tremendous improvements, there remains a gap of up to 2x or more in performance between these schemes and faster manual techniques such as epoch-based reclamation (EBR). In this work, we first advance these ideas and show that in many cases, automatic reference counting can in fact be as fast as the fastest manual SMR techniques. We generalize our previous Concurrent Deferred Reference Counting (CDRC) algorithm to obtain a method for converting any standard manual SMR technique into an automatic reference counting technique with a similar performance profile. Our second contribution is extending this framework to support weak pointers, which are reference-counted pointers that automatically break pointer cycles by not contributing to the reference count, thus addressing a common weakness in reference-counted garbage collection. Our experiments with a C++-library implementation show that our automatic techniques perform in line with their manual counterparts, and that our weak pointer implementation outperforms the best known atomic weak pointer library by up to an order of magnitude on high thread counts. All together, we show that the ease of use of automatic memory management can be achieved without significant cost to practical performance or general applicability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Concurrent Fixed-Size Allocation and Free in Constant Time

Our goal is to efficiently solve the dynamic memory allocation problem in a concurrent setting where processes run asynchronously. On $p$ processes, we can support allocation and free for fixed-sized blocks with $O(1)$ worst-case time per operation, $Θ(p^2)$ additive space overhead, and using only single-word read, write, and CAS. While many algorithms rely on having constant-time fixed-size allocate and free, we present the first implementation of these two operations that is constant time with reasonable space overhead.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Concurrent Reference Counting and Resource Management in Wait-free Constant Time

A common problem when implementing concurrent programs is efficiently protecting against unsafe races between processes reading and then using a resource (e.g., memory blocks, file descriptors, or network connections) and other processes that are concurrently overwriting and then destructing the same resource. Such read-destruct races can be protected with locks, or with lock-free solutions such as hazard-pointers or read-copy-update (RCU). In this paper we describe a method for protecting read-destruct races with expected constant time overhead, $O(P^2)$ space and $O(P^2)$ delayed destructs, and with just single word atomic memory operations (reads, writes, and CAS). It is based on an interface with four primitives, an acquire-release pair to protect accesses, and a retire-eject pair to delay the destruct until it is safe. We refer to this as the acquire-retire interface. Using the acquire-retire interface, we develop simple implementations for three common use cases: (1) memory reclamation with applications to stacks and queues, (2) reference counted objects, and (3) objects manage by ownership with moves, copies, and destructs. The first two results significantly improve on previous results, and the third application is original. Importantly, all operations have expected constant time overhead.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Constant-Time Snapshots with Applications to Concurrent Data Structures

We present an approach for efficiently taking snapshots of the state of a collection of CAS objects. Taking a snapshot allows later operations to read the value that each CAS object had at the time the snapshot was taken. Taking a snapshot requires a constant number of steps and returns a handle to the snapshot. Reading a snapshotted value of an individual CAS object using this handle is wait-free, taking time proportional to the number of successful CASes on the object since the snapshot was taken. Our fast, flexible snapshots yield simple, efficient implementations of atomic multi-point queries on concurrent data structures built from CAS objects. For example, in a search tree where child pointers are updated using CAS, once a snapshot is taken, one can atomically search for ranges of keys, find the first key that matches some criteria, or check if a collection of keys are all present, simply by running a standard sequential algorithm on a snapshot of the tree. To evaluate the performance of our approach, we apply it to two search trees, one balanced and one not. Experiments show that the overhead of supporting snapshots is low across a variety of workloads. Moreover, in almost all cases, range queries on the trees built from our snapshots perform as well as or better than state-of-the-art concurrent data structures that support atomic range queries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Delay-Free Concurrency on Faulty Persistent Memory

Non-volatile memory (NVM) promises persistent main memory that remains correct despite loss of power. This has sparked a line of research into algorithms that can recover from a system crash. Since caches are expected to remain volatile, concurrent data structures and algorithms must be redesigned to guarantee that they are left in a consistent state after a system crash, and that the execution can be continued upon recovery. However, the prospect of redesigning every concurrent data structure or algorithm before it can be used in NVM architectures is daunting. In this paper, we present a construction that takes any concurrent program with reads, writes and CASs to shared memory and makes it persistent, i.e., can be continued after one or more processes fault and have to restart. Importantly the converted algorithm has constant computational delay (preserves instruction counts on each process within a constant factor), as well as constant recovery delay (a process can recover from a fault in a constant number of instructions). We show this first for a simple transformation, and then present optimizations to make it more practical, allowing for a tradeoff for better constant factors in computational delay, for sometimes increased recovery delay. We also provide an optimized transformation that works for any normalized lock-free data structure, thus allowing more efficient constructions for a large class of concurrent algorithms. We experimentally evaluate our transformations by applying them to a queue.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

LL/SC and Atomic Copy: Constant Time, Space Efficient Implementations using only pointer-width CAS

When designing concurrent algorithms, Load-Link/Store-Conditional (LL/SC) is often the ideal primitive to have because unlike Compare and Swap (CAS), LL/SC is immune to the ABA problem. However, the full semantics of LL/SC are not supported by any modern machine, so there has been a significant amount of work on simulations of LL/SC using Compare and Swap (CAS), a synchronization primitive that enjoys widespread hardware support. All of the algorithms so far that are constant time either use unbounded sequence numbers (and thus base objects of unbounded size), or require $Ω(MP)$ space for $M$ LL/SC object (where $P$ is the number of processes). We present a constant time implementation of $M$ LL/SC objects using $Θ(M+kP^2)$ space, where $k$ is the maximum number of overlapping LL/SC operations per process (usually a constant), and requiring only pointer-sized CAS objects. Our implementation can also be used to implement $L$-word $LL/SC$ objects in $Θ(L)$ time (for both $LL$ and $SC$) and $Θ((M+kP^2)L)$ space. To achieve these bounds, we begin by implementing a new primitive called Single-Writer Copy which takes a pointer to a word sized memory location and atomically copies its contents into another object. The restriction is that only one process is allowed to write/copy into the destination object at a time. We believe this primitive will be very useful in designing other concurrent algorithms as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimal (Randomized) Parallel Algorithms in the Binary-Forking Model

In this paper we develop optimal algorithms in the binary-forking model for a variety of fundamental problems, including sorting, semisorting, list ranking, tree contraction, range minima, and ordered set union, intersection and difference. In the binary-forking model, tasks can only fork into two child tasks, but can do so recursively and asynchronously. The tasks share memory, supporting reads, writes and test-and-sets. Costs are measured in terms of work (total number of instructions), and span (longest dependence chain). The binary-forking model is meant to capture both algorithm performance and algorithm-design considerations on many existing multithreaded languages, which are also asynchronous and rely on binary forks either explicitly or under the covers. In contrast to the widely studied PRAM model, it does not assume arbitrary-way forks nor synchronous operations, both of which are hard to implement in modern hardware. While optimal PRAM algorithms are known for the problems studied herein, it turns out that arbitrary-way forking and strict synchronization are powerful, if unrealistic, capabilities. Natural simulations of these PRAM algorithms in the binary-forking model (i.e., implementations in existing parallel languages) incur an $Ω(\log n)$ overhead in span. This paper explores techniques for designing optimal algorithms when limited to binary forking and assuming asynchrony. All algorithms described in this paper are the first algorithms with optimal work and span in the binary-forking model. Most of the algorithms are simple. Many are randomized.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parallel Batch-Dynamic Graph Connectivity

In this paper, we study batch parallel algorithms for the dynamic connectivity problem, a fundamental problem that has received considerable attention in the sequential setting. The most well known sequential algorithm for dynamic connectivity is the elegant level-set algorithm of Holm, de Lichtenberg and Thorup (HDT), which achieves $O(\log^2 n)$ amortized time per edge insertion or deletion, and $O(\log n / \log\log n)$ time per query. We design a parallel batch-dynamic connectivity algorithm that is work-efficient with respect to the HDT algorithm for small batch sizes, and is asymptotically faster when the average batch size is sufficiently large. Given a sequence of batched updates, where $Δ$ is the average batch size of all deletions, our algorithm achieves $O(\log n \log(1 + n / Δ))$ expected amortized work per edge insertion and deletion and $O(\log^3 n)$ depth w.h.p. Our algorithm answers a batch of $k$ connectivity queries in $O(k \log(1 + n/k))$ expected work and $O(\log n)$ depth w.h.p. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first parallel batch-dynamic algorithm for connectivity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sage: Parallel Semi-Asymmetric Graph Algorithms for NVRAMs

Non-volatile main memory (NVRAM) technologies provide an attractive set of features for large-scale graph analytics, including byte-addressability, low idle power, and improved memory-density. NVRAM systems today have an order of magnitude more NVRAM than traditional memory (DRAM). NVRAM systems could therefore potentially allow very large graph problems to be solved on a single machine, at a modest cost. However, a significant challenge in achieving high performance is in accounting for the fact that NVRAM writes can be much more expensive than NVRAM reads. In this paper, we propose an approach to parallel graph analytics using the Parallel Semi-Asymmetric Model (PSAM), in which the graph is stored as a read-only data structure (in NVRAM), and the amount of mutable memory is kept proportional to the number of vertices. Similar to the popular semi-external and semi-streaming models for graph analytics, the PSAM approach assumes that the vertices of the graph fit in a fast read-write memory (DRAM), but the edges do not. In NVRAM systems, our approach eliminates writes to the NVRAM, among other benefits. To experimentally study this new setting, we develop Sage, a parallel semi-asymmetric graph engine with which we implement provably-efficient (and often work-optimal) PSAM algorithms for over a dozen fundamental graph problems. We experimentally study Sage using a 48-core machine on the largest publicly-available real-world graph (the Hyperlink Web graph with over 3.5 billion vertices and 128 billion edges) equipped with Optane DC Persistent Memory, and show that Sage outperforms the fastest prior systems designed for NVRAM. Importantly, we also show that Sage nearly matches the fastest prior systems running solely in DRAM, by effectively hiding the costs of repeatedly accessing NVRAM versus DRAM.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access