BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Kamiel Janssens

Kamiel Janssens contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
gr-qcastro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

External environmental noise influences on Virgo during O3

Sources of geophysical noise, such as wind, sea waves and earthquakes, can have an impact on gravitational wave interferometers causing sensitivity worsening and gaps in data taking. During the 1-year long O3 run (April 1st 2019 to March 27th 2020), the Virgo Collaboration collected a statistically significant dataset to study the response of the detector to a variety of environmental conditions. We used these data to correlate environmental parameters to global detector performance, such as observation range, duty cycle and control losses. Where possible, we identified weaknesses in the detector and we elaborated strategies to improve Virgo robustness against external disturbances for the next run O4, planned to start in summer 2022. In this article we present preliminary results of this study.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Impact of correlated seismic and correlated Newtonian noise on the Einstein Telescope

Correlated noise could impact the search for the gravitational wave background at future Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors. Due to the small distance ($\sim$ 400 m) between the different interferometers of the Einstein Telescope, correlated seismic noise could have a significant effect. To this extent, we study the seismic correlations at the Earth's surface, as well as underground, between seismometers and geophones separated by several hundreds of meters, in the frequency range 0.05 Hz - 50 Hz. Based on these correlated seismic fields we predict the levels of correlated Newtonian noise (NN). We construct upper limits on the allowed seismic coupling function such that correlated seismic noise does not affect the search for an isotropic gravitational wave background. Assuming a facility located 300 m below the surface, the impact on the search for a gravitational wave background of correlated NN from Rayleigh waves are found to be problematic up to $\sim$ 5 Hz. The NN from body waves, however, constitutes a serious threat to the search of a gravitational wave background. Correlated NN from body waves could be up to five to seven orders of magnitude above the planned sensitivity at $\sim$ 3 Hz and it could impede any search for a gravitational wave background below 40 Hz. With a factor 10 of NN reduction via NN cancellation in each interferometer, the effects of the NN on the stochastic search could be eliminated above 30 Hz.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Impact of Schumann resonances on the Einstein Telescope and projections for the magnetic coupling function

Correlated magnetic noise in the form of Schumann resonances could introduce limitations to the gravitational-wave background searches of future Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors. We consider recorded magnetic activity at a candidate site for the Einstein Telescope, and forecast the necessary measures to ensure that magnetic contamination will not pose a threat to the science goals of this third-generation detector. In addition to global magnetic effects, we study local magnetic noise and the impact it might have on co-located interferometers. We express our results as upper limits on the coupling function of magnetic fields to the interferometer arms, implying that any larger values of magnetic coupling into the strain channel would lead to a reduction in the detectors' sensitivity. For gravitational-wave background searches below $\sim 30$ Hz it will be necessary for the Einstein Telescope magnetic isolation coupling to be two to four orders of magnitude better than that measured in the current Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Gravitational-Wave Geodesy: Defining False Alarm Probabilities with Respect to Correlated Noise

Future searches for a gravitational-wave background using Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors might be impacted by correlated noise sources. A well known example are the Schumann resonances, which are extensively studied in the context of searches for a gravitational-wave background. Earlier work has shown that a technique termed "gravitational-wave geodesy" can be used to generically differentiate observations of a gravitational-wave background from signals due to correlated terrestrial effects, requiring true observations to be consistent with the known geometry of our detector network. The key result of this test is a Bayes factor between the hypotheses that a candidate signal is astrophysical or terrestrial in origin. Here, we further formalize the geodesy test, mapping distributions of false-alarm and false-acceptance probabilities to quantify the degree with which a given Bayes factor will boost or diminish our confidence in an apparent detection of the gravitational-wave background. To define the false alarm probability of a given Bayes factor, we must have knowledge of our null hypothesis: the space of all possible correlated terrestrial signals. Since we do not have this knowledge we instead construct a generic space of smooth functions in the frequency domain using Gaussian processes, which we tailor to be conservative. This enables us to use draws from our Gaussian processes as a proxy for all possible non-astrophysical signals. As a demonstration, we apply the tool to the SNR = 1.25 excess observed for a 2/3-power law by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations during their second observing run.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access