Researcher profile

Nick van Remortel

Nick van Remortel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Impact of correlated seismic and correlated Newtonian noise on the Einstein Telescope

Correlated noise could impact the search for the gravitational wave background at future Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors. Due to the small distance ($\sim$ 400 m) between the different interferometers of the Einstein Telescope, correlated seismic noise could have a significant effect. To this extent, we study the seismic correlations at the Earth's surface, as well as underground, between seismometers and geophones separated by several hundreds of meters, in the frequency range 0.05 Hz - 50 Hz. Based on these correlated seismic fields we predict the levels of correlated Newtonian noise (NN). We construct upper limits on the allowed seismic coupling function such that correlated seismic noise does not affect the search for an isotropic gravitational wave background. Assuming a facility located 300 m below the surface, the impact on the search for a gravitational wave background of correlated NN from Rayleigh waves are found to be problematic up to $\sim$ 5 Hz. The NN from body waves, however, constitutes a serious threat to the search of a gravitational wave background. Correlated NN from body waves could be up to five to seven orders of magnitude above the planned sensitivity at $\sim$ 3 Hz and it could impede any search for a gravitational wave background below 40 Hz. With a factor 10 of NN reduction via NN cancellation in each interferometer, the effects of the NN on the stochastic search could be eliminated above 30 Hz.

preprint2021arXiv

Gravitational-Wave Geodesy: Defining False Alarm Probabilities with Respect to Correlated Noise

Future searches for a gravitational-wave background using Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors might be impacted by correlated noise sources. A well known example are the Schumann resonances, which are extensively studied in the context of searches for a gravitational-wave background. Earlier work has shown that a technique termed "gravitational-wave geodesy" can be used to generically differentiate observations of a gravitational-wave background from signals due to correlated terrestrial effects, requiring true observations to be consistent with the known geometry of our detector network. The key result of this test is a Bayes factor between the hypotheses that a candidate signal is astrophysical or terrestrial in origin. Here, we further formalize the geodesy test, mapping distributions of false-alarm and false-acceptance probabilities to quantify the degree with which a given Bayes factor will boost or diminish our confidence in an apparent detection of the gravitational-wave background. To define the false alarm probability of a given Bayes factor, we must have knowledge of our null hypothesis: the space of all possible correlated terrestrial signals. Since we do not have this knowledge we instead construct a generic space of smooth functions in the frequency domain using Gaussian processes, which we tailor to be conservative. This enables us to use draws from our Gaussian processes as a proxy for all possible non-astrophysical signals. As a demonstration, we apply the tool to the SNR = 1.25 excess observed for a 2/3-power law by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations during their second observing run.