Researcher profile

Julia Bennett

Julia Bennett contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Predicting Clinical Intent from Free Text Electronic Health Records

After a patient consultation, a clinician determines the steps in the management of the patient. A clinician may for example request to see the patient again or refer them to a specialist. Whilst most clinicians will record their intent as "next steps" in the patient's clinical notes, in some cases the clinician may forget to indicate their intent as an order or request, e.g. failure to place the follow-up order. This consequently results in patients becoming lost-to-follow up and may in some cases lead to adverse consequences. In this paper we train a machine learning model to detect a clinician's intent to follow up with a patient from the patient's clinical notes. Annotators systematically identified 22 possible types of clinical intent and annotated 3000 Bariatric clinical notes. The annotation process revealed a class imbalance in the labeled data and we found that there was only sufficient labeled data to train 11 out of the 22 intents. We used the data to train a BERT based multilabel classification model and reported the following average accuracy metrics for all intents: macro-precision: 0.91, macro-recall: 0.90, macro-f1: 0.90.