Source author record

Joshua Shapiro

Joshua Shapiro appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

ASAPP-ASR: Multistream CNN and Self-Attentive SRU for SOTA Speech Recognition

In this paper we present state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the LibriSpeech corpus with two novel neural network architectures, a multistream CNN for acoustic modeling and a self-attentive simple recurrent unit (SRU) for language modeling. In the hybrid ASR framework, the multistream CNN acoustic model processes an input of speech frames in multiple parallel pipelines where each stream has a unique dilation rate for diversity. Trained with the SpecAugment data augmentation method, it achieves relative word error rate (WER) improvements of 4% on test-clean and 14% on test-other. We further improve the performance via N-best rescoring using a 24-layer self-attentive SRU language model, achieving WERs of 1.75% on test-clean and 4.46% on test-other.

preprint2013arXiv

The Dependence of Alloy Composition of InGaAs Inserts in GaAs Nanopillars on Selective-Area Pattern Geometry

GaAs nanopillars with 150 nm - 200 nm long axial InGaAs inserts are grown by MOCVD via catalyst-free selective-area-epitaxy (SAE). The alloy composition of the InGaAs region, as determined by room-temperature photoluminescence (PL), depends critically on the pitch and diameter of the selective-area pattern geometry. The PL emission varies based on pattern geometry from 1.0 \{mu}m to 1.25 \{mu}m corresponding to a In to Ga ratio from 0.15 to > 0.3. This In enrichment is explained by a pattern dependent change in the incorporation rate for In and Ga. Capture coefficients for Ga and In adatoms are calculated for each pattern pitch. As the pitch decreases, these data reveal a contest between a synergetic effect (related to nanopillar density) that increases the growth rate and a competition for available material that limits the growth rate. Gallium is more susceptible to both of these effects, causing the observed changes in alloy composition.