BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jonathan Meddaugh

Jonathan Meddaugh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.DSmath.COmath.GN

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Vertex-edge marking score of certain triangular lattices

The vertex-edge marking game is played between two players on a graph, $G=(V,E)$, with one player marking vertices and the other marking edges. The players want to minimize/maximize, respectively, the number of marked edges incident to an unmarked vertex. The vertex-edge coloring number for $G$ is the maximum score achievable with perfect play. Brešar et al., [4], give an upper bound of $5$ for the vertex-edge coloring number for finite planar graphs. It is not known whether the bound is tight. In this paper, in response to questions in [4], we show that the vertex-edge coloring number for the infinite regular triangularization of the plane is 4. We also give two general techniques that allow us to calculate the vertex-edge coloring number in many related triangularizations of the plane.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A characterization of $ω$-limit sets in subshifts of Baire space

In this paper we consider the structure of $ω$-limit sets in subshifts of Baire space. We consider both subshifts of finite type and subshifts of bounded type and we demonstrate that many classical structure theorems for $ω$-limit sets fail in this context. Nevertheless, we obtain characterizations of $ω$-limit sets in subshift of finite types and of attracting $ω$-limit sets in subshifts of bounded type.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Expansivity and unique shadowing

Let $f\colon X\to X$ be a continuous function on a compact metric space. We show that shadowing is equivalent to backwards shadowing and two-sided shadowing when the map $f$ is onto. Using this we go on to show that, for expansive surjective maps the properties shadowing, two-sided shadowing, s-limit shadowing and two-sided s-limit shadowing are equivalent. We show that $f$ is positively expansive and has shadowing if and only if it has unique shadowing (i.e.\ each pseudo-orbit is shadowed by a unique point), extending a result implicit in Walter's proof that positively expansive maps with shadowing are topologically stable. We use the aforementioned result on two-sided shadowing to find an equivalent characterisation of shadowing and expansivity and extend these results to the notion of $n$-expansivity due to Morales.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Shadowing, internal chain transitivity and $α$-limit sets

Let $f \colon X \to X$ be a continuous map on a compact metric space $X$ and let $α_f$, $ω_f$ and $ICT_f$ denote the set of $α$-limit sets, $ω$-limit sets and nonempty closed internally chain transitive sets respectively. We show that if the map $f$ has shadowing then every element of $ICT_f$ can be approximated (to any prescribed accuracy) by both the $α$-limit set and the $ω$-limit set of a full-trajectory. Furthermore, if $f$ is additionally c-expansive then every element of $ICT_f$ is equal to both the $α$-limit set and the $ω$-limit set of a full-trajectory. In particular this means that shadowing guarantees that $\overline{α_f}=\overline{ω_f}=ICT(f)$ (where the closures are taken with respect to the Hausdorff topology on the space of compact sets), whilst the addition of c-expansivity entails $α_f=ω_f=ICT(f)$. We progress by introducing novel variants of shadowing which we use to characterise both maps for which $\overline{α_f}=ICT(f)$ and maps for which $α_f=ICT(f)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Any counterexample to Makienko's conjecture is an indecomposable continuum

Makienko's conjecture, a proposed addition to Sullivan's dictionary, can be stated as follows: The Julia set of a rational function R has buried points if and only if no component of the Fatou set is completely invariant under the second iterate of R. We prove Makienko's conjecture for rational functions with Julia sets that are decomposable continua. This is a very broad collection of Julia sets; it is not known if there exists a rational functions whose Julia set is an indecomposable continuum.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access