Source author record

Joel Mitchell

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

7 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Expansivity and unique shadowing

Let f ⁣:X→Xf\colon X\to X be a continuous function on a compact metric space. We show that shadowing is equivalent to backwards shadowing and two-sided shadowing when the map ff is onto. Using this we go on to show that, for expansive surjective maps the properties shadowing, two-sided shadowing, s-limit shadowing and two-sided s-limit shadowing are equivalent. We show that ff is positively expansive and has shadowing if and only if it has unique shadowing (i.e.\ each pseudo-orbit is shadowed by a unique point), extending a result implicit in Walter's proof that positively expansive maps with shadowing are topologically stable. We use the aforementioned result on two-sided shadowing to find an equivalent characterisation of shadowing and expansivity and extend these results to the notion of nn-expansivity due to Morales.

preprint2020arXiv

Shadowing, internal chain transitivity and αα-limit sets

Let f ⁣:X→Xf \colon X \to X be a continuous map on a compact metric space XX and let αfα_f, ωfω_f and ICTfICT_f denote the set of αα-limit sets, ωω-limit sets and nonempty closed internally chain transitive sets respectively. We show that if the map ff has shadowing then every element of ICTfICT_f can be approximated (to any prescribed accuracy) by both the αα-limit set and the ωω-limit set of a full-trajectory. Furthermore, if ff is additionally c-expansive then every element of ICTfICT_f is equal to both the αα-limit set and the ωω-limit set of a full-trajectory. In particular this means that shadowing guarantees that αf‾=ωf‾=ICT(f)\overline{α_f}=\overline{ω_f}=ICT(f) (where the closures are taken with respect to the Hausdorff topology on the space of compact sets), whilst the addition of c-expansivity entails αf=ωf=ICT(f)α_f=ω_f=ICT(f). We progress by introducing novel variants of shadowing which we use to characterise both maps for which αf‾=ICT(f)\overline{α_f}=ICT(f) and maps for which αf=ICT(f)α_f=ICT(f).

preprint2020arXiv

When is the beginning the end? On full trajectories, limit sets and internal chain transitivity

Let f ⁣:X→Xf \colon X \to X be a continuous map on a compact metric space XX and let αfα_f, ωfω_f and ICTfICT_f denote the set of αα-limit sets, ωω-limit sets and nonempty closed internally chain transitive sets respectively. In this paper we characterise, by introducing novel variants of shadowing, maps for which every element of ICTfICT_f is equal to (resp. may be approximated by) the αα-limit set and the ωω-limit set of the same full trajectory. We construct examples highlighting the difference between these properties.

preprint2019arXiv

Equicontinuity, Transitivity and Sensitivity: the Auslander-Yorke Dichotomy Revisited

We discuss topological equicontinuity and even continuity in dynamical systems. In doing so we provide a classification of topologically transitive dynamical systems in terms of equicontinuity pairs, give a generalisation of the Auslander-Yorke Dichotomy for minimal systems and show there exists a transitive system with an even continuity pair but no equicontinuity point. We define what it means for a system to be eventually sensitive; we give a dichotomy for transitive dynamical systems in relation to eventual sensitivity. Along the way we define a property called splitting and discuss its relation to some existing notions of chaos.

preprint2019arXiv

Orbital shadowing, ωω-limit sets and minimality

Let XX be a compact Hausdorff space, with uniformity U\mathscr{U}, and let f ⁣:X→Xf \colon X \to X be a continuous function. For D∈UD \in \mathscr{U}, a DD-pseudo-orbit is a sequence (xi)(x_i) for which (f(xi),xi+1)∈D(f(x_i),x_{i+1}) \in D for all indices ii. In this paper we show that pseudo-orbits trap ωω-limit sets in a neighbourhood of prescribed accuracy after a uniform time period. A consequence of this is a generalisation of a result of Pilyugin et al: every system has the second weak shadowing property. By way of further applications we give a characterisation of minimal systems in terms of pseudo-orbits and show that every minimal system exhibits the strong orbital shadowing property.

preprint2019arXiv

Preservation of shadowing in discrete dynamical systems

We look at the preservation of various notions of shadowing in discrete dynamical systems under inverse limits, products, factor maps and the induced maps for symmetric products and hyperspaces. The shadowing properties we consider are the following: shadowing, h-shadowing, eventual shadowing, orbital shadowing, strong orbital shadowing, the first and second weak shadowing properties, limit shadowing, s-limit shadowing, orbital limit shadowing and inverse shadowing.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.