Source author record

John W. Loram

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2020arXiv

Locating the pseudogap closing point in cuprate superconductors: absence of entrant or reentrant behavior

Current descriptions of the pseudogap in underdoped cuprates envision a doping-dependent transition line T∗(p)T^*(p) which descends monotonically towards zero just beyond optimal doping. There is much debate as to the location of the terminal point p∗p^* where T∗(p)T^*(p) vanishes, whether or not there is a phase transition at T∗T^* and exactly how T∗(p)T^*(p) behaves below TcT_c within the superconducting dome. One perspective sees T∗(p)T^*(p) cutting the dome and continuing to descend monotonically to zero at pcrit≈0.19p_{crit} \approx 0.19 holes/Cu −- referred to here as `entrant behavior'. Another perspective derived from photoemission studies is that T∗(p)T^*(p) intersects the dome near pcrit≈0.23p_{crit} \approx 0.23 holes/Cu then turns back below TcT_c, falling to zero again around pcrit≈0.19p_{crit} \approx 0.19 −- referred to here as `reentrant behavior'. By examining thermodynamic data for Bi2_2Sr2_2CaCu2_2O8+δ_{8+δ} we show that neither entrant nor reentrant behavior is experimentally supported. Rather, pcrit≈0.19p_{crit} \approx 0.19 sharply delimits the pseudogap regime and for p<0.19p < 0.19 the pseudogap is always present, independent of temperature. Similar results are found for Y0.8_{0.8}Ca0.2_{0.2}Ba2_2Cu3_3O7−δ_{7-δ}. For both materials T∗(p)T^*(p) is not a temperature but a crossover scale, ≈E∗(p)/2kB\approx E^*(p)/2k_B, reflecting instead the underlying pseudogap energy E∗(p)E^*(p) which vanishes as p→0.19p \rightarrow 0.19.

preprint2013arXiv

Coexistence of the superconducting energy gap and pseudogap above and below the transition temperature of superconducting cuprates

We express the superconducting gap, Δ(T)Δ(T), in terms of thermodynamic functions in both ss- and d-wave symmetries. Applying to Bi2_2Sr2_2CaCu2_2O8+δ_{8+δ} and Y0.8_{0.8}Ca0.2_{0.2}Ba2_2Cu3_3O7−δ_{7-δ} we find that for all dopings Δ(T)Δ(T) persists, as a partial gap, high above TcT_c due to strong superconducting fluctuations. Therefore in general two gaps are present above TcT_c, the superconducting gap and the pseudogap, effectively reconciling two highly polarized views concerning pseudogap physics.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.