Source author record

Jeffery L. Tallon

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Catalog footprint

Research overview

3works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Locating the pseudogap closing point in cuprate superconductors: absence of entrant or reentrant behavior

Current descriptions of the pseudogap in underdoped cuprates envision a doping-dependent transition line $T^*(p)$ which descends monotonically towards zero just beyond optimal doping. There is much debate as to the location of the terminal point $p^*$ where $T^*(p)$ vanishes, whether or not there is a phase transition at $T^*$ and exactly how $T^*(p)$ behaves below $T_c$ within the superconducting dome. One perspective sees $T^*(p)$ cutting the dome and continuing to descend monotonically to zero at $p_{crit} \approx 0.19$ holes/Cu $-$ referred to here as `entrant behavior'. Another perspective derived from photoemission studies is that $T^*(p)$ intersects the dome near $p_{crit} \approx 0.23$ holes/Cu then turns back below $T_c$ , falling to zero again around $p_{crit} \approx 0.19$ $-$ referred to here as `reentrant behavior'. By examining thermodynamic data for Bi $_2$ Sr $_2$ CaCu $_2$ O $_{8+δ}$ we show that neither entrant nor reentrant behavior is experimentally supported. Rather, $p_{crit} \approx 0.19$ sharply delimits the pseudogap regime and for $p < 0.19$ the pseudogap is always present, independent of temperature. Similar results are found for Y $_{0.8}$ Ca $_{0.2}$ Ba $_2$ Cu $_3$ O $_{7-δ}$ . For both materials $T^*(p)$ is not a temperature but a crossover scale, $\approx E^*(p)/2k_B$ , reflecting instead the underlying pseudogap energy $E^*(p)$ which vanishes as $p \rightarrow 0.19$ .

preprint2016arXiv

Universal self-field critical current for thin-film superconductors

For any practical superconductor the magnitude of the critical current density, $J_\textrm{c}$ , is crucially important. It sets the upper limit for current in the conductor. Usually $J_\textrm{c}$ falls rapidly with increasing external magnetic field but even in zero external field the current flowing in the conductor generates a self-field which limits $J_\textrm{c}$ . Here we show for thin films of thickness less than the London penetration depth, $λ$ , this limiting $J_\textrm{c}$ adopts a universal value for all superconductors - metals, oxides, cuprates, pnictides, borocarbides and heavy Fermions. For type I superconductors, it is $H_{\textrm{c}}/λ$ where $H_\textrm{c}$ is the thermodynamic critical field. But surprisingly for type II superconductors we find the self-field $J_\textrm{c}$ is $H_{\textrm{c}1}/λ$ where $H_{\textrm{c}1}$ is the lower critical field. $J_\textrm{c}$ is thus fundamentally determined and this provides a simple means to extract absolute values of $λ(T)$ and, from its temperature dependence, the symmetry and magnitude of the superconducting gap.

preprint2013arXiv

Coexistence of the superconducting energy gap and pseudogap above and below the transition temperature of superconducting cuprates

We express the superconducting gap, $Δ(T)$ , in terms of thermodynamic functions in both $s$ - and d-wave symmetries. Applying to Bi $_2$ Sr $_2$ CaCu $_2$ O $_{8+δ}$ and Y $_{0.8}$ Ca $_{0.2}$ Ba $_2$ Cu $_3$ O $_{7-δ}$ we find that for all dopings $Δ(T)$ persists, as a partial gap, high above $T_c$ due to strong superconducting fluctuations. Therefore in general two gaps are present above $T_c$ , the superconducting gap and the pseudogap, effectively reconciling two highly polarized views concerning pseudogap physics.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.