BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

John Collins

John Collins contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-phgr-qchep-exhep-thmath.AGmath.COnucl-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Positivity and renormalization of parton densities

There have been recent debates about whether $\overline{\text{MS}}$ parton densities exactly obey positivity bounds (including the Soffer bound), and whether the bounds should be applied as a constraint on global fits to parton densities and on nonperturbative calculations. A recent paper (JHEP ${\bf \text{11}}$ (2020) 129) appears to provide a proof of positivity in contradiction with earlier work by other authors. We examine their derivation and find that its primary failure is in the apparently uncontroversial statement that bare pdfs are always positive. We show that under the conditions used in the derivation, that statement fails. We provide some elementary calculations in a model QFT that show how this situation can generically arise in reality. In addition, we observe that the methods used in the derivation are in common with much, but not all, other work where factorization is derived. Our examination pinpoints considerable difficulties with these methods that render them either wrong or highly problematic. The issue of positivity highlights that these methods can lead to wrong results of phenomenological importance. From our analysis we identify the restricted situations in which positivity can be violated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A new and complete proof of the Landau condition for pinch singularities of Feynman graphs and other integrals

The Landau equations give a physically useful criterion for how singularities arise in Feynman amplitudes. Furthermore, they are fundamental to the uses of perturbative QCD, by determining the important regions of momentum space in asymptotic problems. Generalizations are also useful. We will show that in existing treatments there are significant gaps in derivations, and in some cases implicit assumptions that will be shown here to be false in important cases like the massless Feynman graphs ubiquitous in QCD applications. In this paper is given a new proof that the Landau condition is both necessary and sufficient for physical-region pinches in the kinds of integral typified by Feynman graphs. The proof's range is broad enough to include the modified Feynman graphs that are used in QCD applications. Unlike many existing derivations, there is no need to use the Feynman parameter method. Some possible further applications of the new proof and its subsidiary results are proposed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Gluing stability conditions

We define and study a gluing procedure for Bridgeland stability conditions in the situation when a triangulated category has a semiorthogonal decomposition. As an application we construct stability conditions on the derived categories of ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$-equivariant sheaves associated with ramified double coverings of ${\mathbb{P}}^3$. Also, we study the stability space for the derived category of ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$-equivariant coherent sheaves on a smooth curve $X$, associated with a degree 2 map $X\to Y$, where $Y$ is another smooth curve. In the case when the genus of $Y$ is $\geq 1$ we give a complete description of the stability space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2004arXiv

Lorentz invariance and quantum gravity: an additional fine-tuning problem?

Trying to combine standard quantum field theories with gravity leads to a breakdown of the usual structure of space-time at around the Planck length, 1.6*10^{-35} m, with possible violations of Lorentz invariance. Calculations of preferred-frame effects in quantum gravity have further motivated high precision searches for Lorentz violation. Here, we explain that combining known elementary particle interactions with a Planck-scale preferred frame gives rise to Lorentz violation at the percent level, some 20 orders of magnitude higher than earlier estimates, unless the bare parameters of the theory are unnaturally strongly fine-tuned. Therefore an important task is not just the improvement of the precision of searches for violations of Lorentz invariance, but also the search for theoretical mechanisms for automatically preserving Lorentz invariance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access