Paper detail

Two-population model for MTL neurons: The vast majority are almost silent

Recordings in the human medial temporal lobe have found many neurons that respond to pictures (and related stimuli) of just one particular person out of those presented. It has been proposed that these are concept cells, responding to just a single concept. However, a direct experimental test of the concept cell idea appears impossible, because it would need the measurement of the response of each cell to enormous numbers of other stimuli. Here we propose a new statistical method for analysis of the data, that gives a more powerful way to analyze how close data are to the concept-cell idea. It exploits the large number of sampled neurons, to give sensitivity to situations where the average response sparsity is to much less than one response for the number of presented stimuli. We show that a conventional model where a single sparsity is postulated for all neurons gives an extremely poor fit to the data. In contrast a model with two dramatically different populations give an excellent fit to data from the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. In the hippocampus, one population has 7% of the cells with a 2.6% sparsity. But a much larger fraction 93% respond to only 0.1% of the stimuli. This results in an extreme bias in the reported responsive of neurons compared with a typical neuron. Finally, we show how to allow for the fact that some of reported identified units correspond to multiple neurons, and find that our conclusions at the neural level are quantitatively changed but strengthened, with an even stronger difference between the two populations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.