Source author record

John Augustine

John Augustine appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

17works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

17 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Guarding Polygons with Holes

We study the Cooperative Guarding problem for polygons with holes in a mobile multi-agents setting. Given a set of agents, initially deployed at a point in a polygon with $n$ vertices and $h$ holes, we require the agents to collaboratively explore and position themselves in such a way that every point in the polygon is visible to at least one agent and that the set of agents are visibly connected. We study the problem under two models of computation, one in which the agents can compute exact distances and angles between two points in its visibility, and one in which agents can only compare distances and angles. In the stronger model, we provide a deterministic $O(n)$ round algorithm to compute such a cooperative guard set while not requiring more than $\frac{n + h}{2}$ agents and $O(\log n)$ bits of persistent memory per agent. In the weaker model, we provide an $O(n^4)$ round algorithm, that does not require more than $\frac{n+2h}{2}$ agents.

preprint2022arXiv

Recurrent Problems in the LOCAL model

The paper considers the SUPPORTED model of distributed computing introduced by Schmid and Suomela [HotSDN'13], generalizing the LOCAL and CONGEST models. In this framework, multiple instances of the same problem, differing from each other by the subnetwork to which they apply, recur over time, and need to be solved efficiently online. To do that, one may rely on an initial preprocessing phase for computing some useful information. This preprocessing phase makes it possible, in some cases, to overcome locality-based time lower bounds. A first contribution of the current paper is expanding the spectrum of problem types to which the SUPPORTED model applies. In addition to subnetwork-defined recurrent problems, we introduce also recurrent problems of two additional types: (i) instances defined by partial client sets, and (ii) instances defined by partially fixed outputs. Our second contribution is illustrating the versatility of the SUPPORTED framework by examining recurrent variants of three classical graph problems. The first problem is Minimum Client Dominating Set (CDS), a recurrent version of the classical dominating set problem with each recurrent instance requiring us to dominate a partial client set. We provide a constant time approximation scheme for CDS on trees and planar graphs. The second problem is Color Completion (CC), a recurrent version of the coloring problem in which each recurrent instance comes with a partially fixed coloring (of some of the vertices) that must be completed. We study the minimum number of new colors and the minimum total number of colors necessary for completing this task. The third problem we study is a recurrent version of Locally Checkable Labellings (LCL) on paths of length $n$. We show that such problems have complexities that are either $Θ(1)$ or $Θ(n)$, extending the results of Foerster et al. [INFOCOM'19].

preprint2021arXiv

Distributed Graph Realizations

We study graph realization problems from a distributed perspective and we study it in the node capacitated clique (NCC) model of distributed computing, recently introduced for representing peer-to-peer networks. We focus on two central variants, degree-sequence realization and minimum threshold-connectivity realization both of which result in overlay network realizations. Overlay network realizations can be either explicit or implicit. Explicit realizations require both endpoints of any edge in the realized graph to be aware of the edge. In implicit realizations, on the other hand, at least one endpoint of each edge of the realized graph needs to be aware of the edge. The main realization algorithms we present are the following. 1. An $\tilde{O}(\min\{\sqrt{m},Δ\})$ time algorithm for implicit realization of a degree sequence. Here, $Δ= \max_v d(v)$ is the maximum degree and $m = (1/2) \sum_v d(v)$ is the number of edges in the final realization. An $\tilde{O}(Δ)$ time algorithm for an explicit realization of a degree sequence. We first compute an implicit realization and then transform it into an explicit one in $\tilde{O}(Δ)$ additional rounds. 2. An $\tilde{O}(Δ)$ time algorithm for the threshold connectivity problem that obtains an explicit solution and an improved $\tilde{O}(1)$ algorithm for implicit realization when all nodes know each other's IDs. These algorithms are 2-approximations w.r.t. the number of edges. We complement our upper bounds with lower bounds to show that the above algorithms are tight up to factors of $\log n$. Additionally, we provide algorithms for realizing trees and an $\tilde{O}(1)$ round algorithm for approximate degree sequence realization.

preprint2020arXiv

Guarding a Polygon Without Losing Touch

We study the classical Art Gallery Problem first proposed by Klee in 1973 from a mobile multi-agents perspective. Specifically, we require an optimally small number of agents (also called guards) to navigate and position themselves in the interior of an unknown simple polygon with $n$ vertices such that the collective view of all the agents covers the polygon. We consider the visibly connected setting wherein agents must remain connected through line of sight links -- a requirement particularly relevant to multi-agent systems. We first provide a centralized algorithm for the visibly connected setting that runs in time $O(n)$, which is of course optimal. We then provide algorithms for two different distributed settings. In the first setting, agents can only perceive relative proximity (i.e., can tell which of a pair of objects is closer) whereas they can perceive exact distances in the second setting. Our distributed algorithms work despite agents having no prior knowledge of the polygon. Furthermore, we provide lower bounds to show that our distributed algorithms are near-optimal. Our visibly connected guarding ensures that (i) the guards form a connected network and (ii) the polygon is fully guarded. Consequently, this guarding provides the distributed infrastructure to execute any geometric algorithm for this polygon.

preprint2020arXiv

Latency, Capacity, and Distributed MST

We study the cost of distributed MST construction in the setting where each edge has a latency and a capacity, along with the weight. Edge latencies capture the delay on the links of the communication network, while capacity captures their throughput (in this case, the rate at which messages can be sent). Depending on how the edge latencies relate to the edge weights, we provide several tight bounds on the time and messages required to construct an MST. When edge weights exactly correspond with the latencies, we show that, perhaps interestingly, the bottleneck parameter in determining the running time of an algorithm is the total weight $W$ of the MST (rather than the total number of nodes $n$, as in the standard CONGEST model). That is, we show a tight bound of $\tildeΘ(D + \sqrt{W/c})$ rounds, where $D$ refers to the latency diameter of the graph, $W$ refers to the total weight of the constructed MST and edges have capacity $c$. The proposed algorithm sends $\tilde{O}(m+W)$ messages, where $m$, the total number of edges in the network graph under consideration, is a known lower bound on message complexity for MST construction. We also show that $Ω(W)$ is a lower bound for fast MST constructions. When the edge latencies and the corresponding edge weights are unrelated, and either can take arbitrary values, we show that (unlike the sub-linear time algorithms in the standard CONGEST model, on small diameter graphs), the best time complexity that can be achieved is $\tildeΘ(D+n/c)$. However, if we restrict all edges to have equal latency $\ell$ and capacity $c$ while having possibly different weights (weights could deviate arbitrarily from $\ell$), we give an algorithm that constructs an MST in $\tilde{O}(D + \sqrt{n\ell/c})$ time. In each case, we provide nearly matching upper and lower bounds.

preprint2016arXiv

Information Spreading in Dynamic Networks under Oblivious Adversaries

We study the problem of gossip in dynamic networks controlled by an adversary that can modify the network arbitrarily from one round to another, provided that the network is always connected. In the gossip problem, $n$ tokens are arbitrarily distributed among the $n$ network nodes, and the goal is to disseminate all the $n$ tokens to every node. Our focus is on token-forwarding algorithms, which do not manipulate tokens in any way other than storing, copying, and forwarding them. Gossip can be completed in linear time in any static network, but a basic open question for dynamic networks is the existence of a distributed protocol that can do significantly better than an easily achievable bound of $O(n^2)$ rounds. In previous work, it has been shown that under adaptive adversaries, every token forwarding algorithm requires $Ω(n^2/\log n)$ rounds. In this paper, we study oblivious adversaries, which differ from adaptive adversaries in one crucial aspect--- they are oblivious to random choices made by the protocol. We present an $\tildeΩ(n^{3/2})$ lower bound under an oblivious adversary for RANDDIFF, a natural algorithm in which neighbors exchange a token chosen uniformly at random from the difference of their token sets. We also present an $\tildeΩ(n^{4/3})$ bound under a stronger notion of oblivious adversary for symmetric knowledge-based algorithms. On the positive side, we present a centralized algorithm that completes gossip in $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ rounds. We also show an $\tilde{O}(n^{5/3})$ upper bound for RANDDIFF in a restricted class of oblivious adversaries, which we call paths-respecting.

preprint2016arXiv

Optimal Evacuation Flows on Dynamic Paths with General Edge Capacities

A Dynamic Graph Network is a graph in which each edge has an associated travel time and a capacity (width) that limits the number of items that can travel in parallel along that edge. Each vertex in this dynamic graph network begins with the number of items that must be evacuated into designated sink vertices. A $k$-sink evacuation protocol finds the location of $k$ sinks and associated evacuation movement protocol that allows evacuating all the items to a sink in minimum time. The associated evacuation movement must impose a confluent flow, i.e, all items passing through a particular vertex exit that vertex using the same edge. In this paper we address the $k$-sink evacuation problem on a dynamic path network. We provide solutions that run in $O(n \log n)$ time for $k=1$ and $O(k n \log^2 n)$ for $k >1$ and work for arbitrary edge capacities.

preprint2014arXiv

A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Minimax-Regret Evacuation on a Dynamic Path

A dynamic path network is an undirected path with evacuees situated at each vertex. To evacuate the path, evacuees travel towards a designated sink (doorway) to exit. Each edge has a capacity, the number of evacuees that can enter the edge in unit time. Congestion occurs if an evacuee has to wait at a vertex for other evacuees to leave first. The basic problem is to place k sinks on the line, with an associated evacuation strategy, so as to minimize the total time needed to evacuate everyone. The minmax-regret version introduces uncertainty into the input, with the number of evacuees at vertices only being specified to within a range. The problem is to find a universal solution whose regret (difference from optimal for a given input) is minimized over all legal inputs. The previously best known algorithms for the minmax regret version problem ran in time exponential in k. In this paper, we derive new prop- erties of solutions that yield the first polynomial time algorithms for solving the problem.

preprint2014arXiv

Distributed Agreement in Dynamic Peer-to-Peer Networks

Motivated by the need for robust and fast distributed computation in highly dynamic Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks, we study algorithms for the fundamental distributed agreement problem. P2P networks are highly dynamic networks that experience heavy node {\em churn}. Our goal is to design fast algorithms (running in a small number of rounds) that guarantee, despite high node churn rate, that almost all nodes reach a stable agreement. Our main contributions are randomized distributed algorithms that guarantee {\em stable almost-everywhere agreement} with high probability even under high adversarial churn in a polylogarithmic number of rounds: 1. An $O(\log^2 n)$-round ($n$ is the stable network size) randomized algorithm that achieves almost-everywhere agreement with high probability under up to {\em linear} churn {\em per round} (i.e., $εn$, for some small constant $ε> 0$), assuming that the churn is controlled by an oblivious adversary (that has complete knowledge and control of what nodes join and leave and at what time and has unlimited computational power, but is oblivious to the random choices made by the algorithm). Our algorithm requires only polylogarithmic in $n$ bits to be processed and sent (per round) by each node. 2. An $O(\log m\log^3 n)$-round randomized algorithm that achieves almost-everywhere agreement with high probability under up to $ε\sqrt{n}$ churn per round (for some small $ε> 0$), where $m$ is the size of the input value domain, that works even under an adaptive adversary (that also knows the past random choices made by the algorithm). This algorithm requires up to polynomial in $n$ bits (and up to $O(\log m)$ bits) to be processed and sent (per round) by each node.

preprint2013arXiv

Robust Leader Election in a Fast-Changing World

We consider the problem of electing a leader among nodes in a highly dynamic network where the adversary has unbounded capacity to insert and remove nodes (including the leader) from the network and change connectivity at will. We present a randomized Las Vegas algorithm that (re)elects a leader in O(D\log n) rounds with high probability, where D is a bound on the dynamic diameter of the network and n is the maximum number of nodes in the network at any point in time. We assume a model of broadcast-based communication where a node can send only 1 message of O(\log n) bits per round and is not aware of the receivers in advance. Thus, our results also apply to mobile wireless ad-hoc networks, improving over the optimal (for deterministic algorithms) O(Dn) solution presented at FOMC 2011. We show that our algorithm is optimal by proving that any randomized Las Vegas algorithm takes at least omega(D\log n) rounds to elect a leader with high probability, which shows that our algorithm yields the best possible (up to constants) termination time.

preprint2013arXiv

Storage and Search in Dynamic Peer-to-Peer Networks

We study robust and efficient distributed algorithms for searching, storing, and maintaining data in dynamic Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks. P2P networks are highly dynamic networks that experience heavy node churn (i.e., nodes join and leave the network continuously over time). Our goal is to guarantee, despite high node churn rate, that a large number of nodes in the network can store, retrieve, and maintain a large number of data items. Our main contributions are fast randomized distributed algorithms that guarantee the above with high probability (whp) even under high adversarial churn: 1. A randomized distributed search algorithm that (whp) guarantees that searches from as many as $n - o(n)$ nodes ($n$ is the stable network size) succeed in ${O}(\log n)$-rounds despite ${O}(n/\log^{1+δ} n)$ churn, for any small constant $δ> 0$, per round. We assume that the churn is controlled by an oblivious adversary (that has complete knowledge and control of what nodes join and leave and at what time, but is oblivious to the random choices made by the algorithm). 2. A storage and maintenance algorithm that guarantees (whp) data items can be efficiently stored (with only $Θ(\log{n})$ copies of each data item) and maintained in a dynamic P2P network with churn rate up to ${O}(n/\log^{1+δ} n)$ per round. Our search algorithm together with our storage and maintenance algorithm guarantees that as many as $n - o(n)$ nodes can efficiently store, maintain, and search even under ${O}(n/\log^{1+δ} n)$ churn per round. Our algorithms require only polylogarithmic in $n$ bits to be processed and sent (per round) by each node. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithms are the first-known, fully-distributed storage and search algorithms that provably work under highly dynamic settings (i.e., high churn rates per step).

preprint2011arXiv

Dynamics of Profit-Sharing Games

An important task in the analysis of multiagent systems is to understand how groups of selfish players can form coalitions, i.e., work together in teams. In this paper, we study the dynamics of coalition formation under bounded rationality. We consider settings where each team's profit is given by a convex function, and propose three profit-sharing schemes, each of which is based on the concept of marginal utility. The agents are assumed to be myopic, i.e., they keep changing teams as long as they can increase their payoff by doing so. We study the properties (such as closeness to Nash equilibrium or total profit) of the states that result after a polynomial number of such moves, and prove bounds on the price of anarchy and the price of stability of the corresponding games.

preprint2011arXiv

Enforcing efficient equilibria in network design games via subsidies

The efficient design of networks has been an important engineering task that involves challenging combinatorial optimization problems. Typically, a network designer has to select among several alternatives which links to establish so that the resulting network satisfies a given set of connectivity requirements and the cost of establishing the network links is as low as possible. The Minimum Spanning Tree problem, which is well-understood, is a nice example. In this paper, we consider the natural scenario in which the connectivity requirements are posed by selfish users who have agreed to share the cost of the network to be established according to a well-defined rule. The design proposed by the network designer should now be consistent not only with the connectivity requirements but also with the selfishness of the users. Essentially, the users are players in a so-called network design game and the network designer has to propose a design that is an equilibrium for this game. As it is usually the case when selfishness comes into play, such equilibria may be suboptimal. In this paper, we consider the following question: can the network designer enforce particular designs as equilibria or guarantee that efficient designs are consistent with users' selfishness by appropriately subsidizing some of the network links? In an attempt to understand this question, we formulate corresponding optimization problems and present positive and negative results.

preprint2010arXiv

On the Continuous CNN Problem

In the (discrete) CNN problem, online requests appear as points in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Each request must be served before the next one is revealed. We have a server that can serve a request simply by aligning either its $x$ or $y$ coordinate with the request. The goal of the online algorithm is to minimize the total $L_1$ distance traveled by the server to serve all the requests. The best known competitive ratio for the discrete version is 879 (due to Sitters and Stougie). We study the continuous version, in which, the request can move continuously in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the server must continuously serve the request. A simple adversarial argument shows that the lower bound on the competitive ratio of any online algorithm for the continuous CNN problem is 3. Our main contribution is an online algorithm with competitive ratio $3+2 \sqrt{3} \approx 6.464$. Our analysis is tight. The continuous version generalizes the discrete orthogonal CNN problem, in which every request must be $x$ or $y$ aligned with the previous request. Therefore, Our result improves upon the previous best competitive ratio of 9 (due to Iwama and Yonezawa).

preprint2010arXiv

Querying for the Largest Empty Geometric Object in a Desired Location

We study new types of geometric query problems defined as follows: given a geometric set $P$, preprocess it such that given a query point $q$, the location of the largest circle that does not contain any member of $P$, but contains $q$ can be reported efficiently. The geometric sets we consider for $P$ are boundaries of convex and simple polygons, and point sets. While we primarily focus on circles as the desired shape, we also briefly discuss empty rectangles in the context of point sets.

preprint2008arXiv

Largest Empty Circle Centered on a Query Line

The Largest Empty Circle problem seeks the largest circle centered within the convex hull of a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and devoid of points from $P$. In this paper, we introduce a query version of this well-studied problem. In our query version, we are required to preprocess $P$ so that when given a query line $Q$, we can quickly compute the largest empty circle centered at some point on $Q$ and within the convex hull of $P$. We present solutions for two special cases and the general case; all our queries run in $O(\log n)$ time. We restrict the query line to be horizontal in the first special case, which we preprocess in $O(n α(n) \log n)$ time and space, where $α(n)$ is the slow growing inverse of the Ackermann's function. When the query line is restricted to pass through a fixed point, the second special case, our preprocessing takes $O(n α(n)^{O(α(n))} \log n)$ time and space. We use insights from the two special cases to solve the general version of the problem with preprocessing time and space in $O(n^3 \log n)$ and $O(n^3)$ respectively.