BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Joao Marques-Silva

Joao Marques-Silva appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingSoftware Engineering

Catalog footprint

What is connected

18works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

18 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Computing Relevant Features for Explaining NBCs

Despite the progress observed with model-agnostic explainable AI (XAI), it is the case that model-agnostic XAI can produce incorrect explanations. One alternative are the so-called formal approaches to XAI, that include PI-explanations. Unfortunately, PI-explanations also exhibit important drawbacks, the most visible of which is arguably their size. The computation of relevant features serves to trade off probabilistic precision for the number of features in an explanation. However, even for very simple classifiers, the complexity of computing sets of relevant features is prohibitive. This paper investigates the computation of relevant sets for Naive Bayes Classifiers (NBCs), and shows that, in practice, these are easy to compute. Furthermore, the experiments confirm that succinct sets of relevant features can be obtained with NBCs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Deciding Feature Membership in Explanations of SDD & Related Classifiers

When reasoning about explanations of Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, a pertinent query is to decide whether some sensitive features can serve for explaining a given prediction. Recent work showed that the feature membership problem (FMP) is hard for $Σ_2^P$ for a broad class of classifiers. In contrast, this paper shows that for a number of families of classifiers, FMP is in NP. Concretely, the paper proves that any classifier for which an explanation can be computed in polynomial time, then deciding feature membership in an explanation can be decided with one NP oracle call. The paper then proposes propositional encodings for classifiers represented with Sentential Decision Diagrams (SDDs) and for other related propositional languages. The experimental results confirm the practical efficiency of the proposed approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Provably Precise, Succinct and Efficient Explanations for Decision Trees

Decision trees (DTs) embody interpretable classifiers. DTs have been advocated for deployment in high-risk applications, but also for explaining other complex classifiers. Nevertheless, recent work has demonstrated that predictions in DTs ought to be explained with rigorous approaches. Although rigorous explanations can be computed in polynomial time for DTs, their size may be beyond the cognitive limits of human decision makers. This paper investigates the computation of δ-relevant sets for DTs. δ-relevant sets denote explanations that are succinct and provably precise. These sets represent generalizations of rigorous explanations, which are precise with probability one, and so they enable trading off explanation size for precision. The paper proposes two logic encodings for computing smallest δ-relevant sets for DTs. The paper further devises a polynomial-time algorithm for computing δ-relevant sets which are not guaranteed to be subset-minimal, but for which the experiments show to be most often subset-minimal in practice. The experimental results also demonstrate the practical efficiency of computing smallest δ-relevant sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Scalable Two Stage Approach to Computing Optimal Decision Sets

Machine learning (ML) is ubiquitous in modern life. Since it is being deployed in technologies that affect our privacy and safety, it is often crucial to understand the reasoning behind its decisions, warranting the need for explainable AI. Rule-based models, such as decision trees, decision lists, and decision sets, are conventionally deemed to be the most interpretable. Recent work uses propositional satisfiability (SAT) solving (and its optimization variants) to generate minimum-size decision sets. Motivated by limited practical scalability of these earlier methods, this paper proposes a novel approach to learn minimum-size decision sets by enumerating individual rules of the target decision set independently of each other, and then solving a set cover problem to select a subset of rules. The approach makes use of modern maximum satisfiability and integer linear programming technologies. Experiments on a wide range of publicly available datasets demonstrate the advantage of the new approach over the state of the art in SAT-based decision set learning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Propositional Abduction with Implicit Hitting Sets

Logic-based abduction finds important applications in artificial intelligence and related areas. One application example is in finding explanations for observed phenomena. Propositional abduction is a restriction of abduction to the propositional domain, and complexity-wise is in the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. Recent work has shown that exploiting implicit hitting sets and propositional satisfiability (SAT) solvers provides an efficient approach for propositional abduction. This paper investigates this earlier work and proposes a number of algorithmic improvements. These improvements are shown to yield exponential reductions in the number of SAT solver calls. More importantly, the experimental results show significant performance improvements compared to the the best approaches for propositional abduction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Computing maximal autarkies with few and simple oracle queries

We consider the algorithmic task of computing a maximal autarky for a clause-set F, i.e., a partial assignment which satisfies every clause of F it touches, and where this property is destroyed by adding any non-empty set of further assignments. We employ SAT solvers as oracles, using various capabilities. Using the standard SAT oracle, log_2(n(F)) oracle calls suffice, where n(F) is the number of variables, but the drawback is that (translated) cardinality constraints are employed, which makes this approach less efficient in practice. Using an extended SAT oracle, motivated by the capabilities of modern SAT solvers, we show how to compute maximal autarkies with 2 n(F)^{1/2} simpler oracle calls. This novel algorithm combines the previous two main approaches, based on the autarky-resolution duality and on SAT translations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Efficient MUS Enumeration of Horn Formulae with Applications to Axiom Pinpointing

The enumeration of minimal unsatisfiable subsets (MUSes) finds a growing number of practical applications, that includes a wide range of diagnosis problems. As a concrete example, the problem of axiom pinpointing in the EL family of description logics (DLs) can be modeled as the enumeration of the group-MUSes of Horn formulae. In turn, axiom pinpointing for the EL family of DLs finds important applications, such as debugging medical ontologies, of which SNOMED CT is the best known example. The main contribution of this paper is to develop an efficient group-MUS enumerator for Horn formulae, HGMUS, that finds immediate application in axiom pinpointing for the EL family of DLs. In the process of developing HGMUS, the paper also identifies performance bottlenecks of existing solutions. The new algorithm is shown to outperform all alternative approaches when the problem domain targeted by group-MUS enumeration of Horn formulae is axiom pinpointing for the EL family of DLs, with a representative suite of examples taken from different medical ontologies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Towards Efficient Axiom Pinpointing of EL+ Ontologies

The EL family of Description Logics (DLs) has been the subject of interest in recent years. On the one hand, these DLs are tractable, but fairly inexpressive. On the other hand, these DLs can be used for designing different classes of ontologies, most notably ontologies from the medical domain. Unfortunately, building ontologies is error-prone. As a result, inferable subsumption relations among concepts may be unintended. In recent years, the problem of axiom pinpointing has been studied with the purpose of providing minimal sets of axioms that explain unintended subsumption relations. For the concrete case of EL and EL+, the most efficient approaches consist of encoding the problem into propositional logic, specifically as a Horn formula, which is then analyzed with a dedicated algorithm. This paper builds on this earlier work, but exploits the important relationship between minimal axioms sets and minimal unsatisfiable subformulas in the propositional domain. In turn, this relationship allows applying a vast body of recent work in the propositional domain to the concrete case of axiom pinpointing for EL and its variants. From a practical perspective, the algorithms described in this paper are often several orders of magnitude more efficient that the current state of the art in axiom pinpointing for the EL family of DLs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Computing Minimal Sets on Propositional Formulae I: Problems & Reductions

Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) is arguably the archetypical NP-complete decision problem. Progress in SAT solving algorithms has motivated an ever increasing number of practical applications in recent years. However, many practical uses of SAT involve solving function as opposed to decision problems. Concrete examples include computing minimal unsatisfiable subsets, minimal correction subsets, prime implicates and implicants, minimal models, backbone literals, and autarkies, among several others. In most cases, solving a function problem requires a number of adaptive or non-adaptive calls to a SAT solver. Given the computational complexity of SAT, it is therefore important to develop algorithms that either require the smallest possible number of calls to the SAT solver, or that involve simpler instances. This paper addresses a number of representative function problems defined on Boolean formulas, and shows that all these function problems can be reduced to a generic problem of computing a minimal set subject to a monotone predicate. This problem is referred to as the Minimal Set over Monotone Predicate (MSMP) problem. This exercise provides new ways for solving well-known function problems, including prime implicates, minimal correction subsets, backbone literals, independent variables and autarkies, among several others. Moreover, this exercise motivates the development of more efficient algorithms for the MSMP problem. Finally the paper outlines a number of areas of future research related with extensions of the MSMP problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Minimal Corrections in ASP

As a programming paradigm, answer set programming (ASP) brings about the usual issue of the human error. Hence, it is desirable to provide automated techniques that could help the programmer to find the error. This paper addresses the question of computing a subset-minimal correction of a contradictory ASP program. A contradictory ASP program is often undesirable and we wish to provide an automated way of fixing it. We consider a minimal correction set of a contradictory program to be an irreducible set of rules whose removal makes the program consistent. In contrast to propositional logic, corrections of ASP programs behave non-monotonically. Nevertheless, we show that a variety of algorithms for correction set computation in propositional logic can be ported to ASP. An experimental evaluation was carried showing that having a portfolio of such algorithms is indeed of benefit.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On QBF Proofs and Preprocessing

QBFs (quantified boolean formulas), which are a superset of propositional formulas, provide a canonical representation for PSPACE problems. To overcome the inherent complexity of QBF, significant effort has been invested in developing QBF solvers as well as the underlying proof systems. At the same time, formula preprocessing is crucial for the application of QBF solvers. This paper focuses on a missing link in currently-available technology: How to obtain a certificate (e.g. proof) for a formula that had been preprocessed before it was given to a solver? The paper targets a suite of commonly-used preprocessing techniques and shows how to reconstruct certificates for them. On the negative side, the paper discusses certain limitations of the currently-used proof systems in the light of preprocessing. The presented techniques were implemented and evaluated in the state-of-the-art QBF preprocessor bloqqer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

SAT-based Preprocessing for MaxSAT (extended version)

State-of-the-art algorithms for industrial instances of MaxSAT problem rely on iterative calls to a SAT solver. Preprocessing is crucial for the acceleration of SAT solving, and the key preprocessing techniques rely on the application of resolution and subsumption elimination. Additionally, satisfiability-preserving clause elimination procedures are often used. Since MaxSAT computation typically involves a large number of SAT calls, we are interested in whether an input instance to a MaxSAT problem can be preprocessed up-front, i.e. prior to running the MaxSAT solver, rather than (or, in addition to) during each iterative SAT solver call. The key requirement in this setting is that the preprocessing has to be sound, i.e. so that the solution can be reconstructed correctly and efficiently after the execution of a MaxSAT algorithm on the preprocessed instance. While, as we demonstrate in this paper, certain clause elimination procedures are sound for MaxSAT, it is well-known that this is not the case for resolution and subsumption elimination. In this paper we show how to adapt these preprocessing techniques to MaxSAT. To achieve this we recast the MaxSAT problem in a recently introduced labelled-CNF framework, and show that within the framework the preprocessing techniques can be applied soundly. Furthermore, we show that MaxSAT algorithms restated in the framework have a natural implementation on top of an incremental SAT solver. We evaluate the prototype implementation of a MaxSAT algorithm WMSU1 in this setting, demonstrate the effectiveness of preprocessing, and show overall improvement with respect to non-incremental versions of the algorithm on some classes of problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Generalizing Redundancy in Propositional Logic: Foundations and Hitting Sets Duality

Detection and elimination of redundant clauses from propositional formulas in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) is a fundamental problem with numerous application domains, including AI, and has been the subject of extensive research. Moreover, a number of recent applications motivated various extensions of this problem. For example, unsatisfiable formulas partitioned into disjoint subsets of clauses (so-called groups) often need to be simplified by removing redundant groups, or may contain redundant variables, rather than clauses. In this report we present a generalized theoretical framework of labelled CNF formulas that unifies various extensions of the redundancy detection and removal problem and allows to derive a number of results that subsume and extend previous work. The follow-up reports contain a number of additional theoretical results and algorithms for various computational problems in the context of the proposed framework.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Lazy Decomposition for Distributed Decision Procedures

The increasing popularity of automated tools for software and hardware verification puts ever increasing demands on the underlying decision procedures. This paper presents a framework for distributed decision procedures (for first-order problems) based on Craig interpolation. Formulas are distributed in a lazy fashion, i.e., without the use of costly decomposition algorithms. Potential models which are shown to be incorrect are reconciled through the use of Craig interpolants. Experimental results on challenging propositional satisfiability problems indicate that our method is able to outperform traditional solving techniques even without the use of additional resources.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

On Validating Boolean Optimizers

Boolean optimization finds a wide range of application domains, that motivated a number of different organizations of Boolean optimizers since the mid 90s. Some of the most successful approaches are based on iterative calls to an NP oracle, using either linear search, binary search or the identification of unsatisfiable sub-formulas. The increasing use of Boolean optimizers in practical settings raises the question of confidence in computed results. For example, the issue of confidence is paramount in safety critical settings. One way of increasing the confidence of the results computed by Boolean optimizers is to develop techniques for validating the results. Recent work studied the validation of Boolean optimizers based on branch-and-bound search. This paper complements existing work, and develops methods for validating Boolean optimizers that are based on iterative calls to an NP oracle. This entails implementing solutions for validating both satisfiable and unsatisfiable answers from the NP oracle. The work described in this paper can be applied to a wide range of Boolean optimizers, that find application in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization and in Maximum Satisfiability. Preliminary experimental results indicate that the impact of the proposed method in overall performance is negligible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

QBF-Based Boolean Function Bi-Decomposition

Boolean function bi-decomposition is ubiquitous in logic synthesis. It entails the decomposition of a Boolean function using two-input simple logic gates. Existing solutions for bi-decomposition are often based on BDDs and, more recently, on Boolean Satisfiability. In addition, the partition of the input set of variables is either assumed, or heuristic solutions are considered for finding good partitions. In contrast to earlier work, this paper proposes the use of Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) for computing bi- decompositions. These bi-decompositions are optimal in terms of the achieved disjointness and balancedness of the input set of variables. Experimental results, obtained on representative benchmarks, demonstrate clear improvements in the quality of computed decompositions, but also the practical feasibility of QBF-based bi-decomposition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Counterexample Guided Abstraction Refinement Algorithm for Propositional Circumscription

Circumscription is a representative example of a nonmonotonic reasoning inference technique. Circumscription has often been studied for first order theories, but its propositional version has also been the subject of extensive research, having been shown equivalent to extended closed world assumption (ECWA). Moreover, entailment in propositional circumscription is a well-known example of a decision problem in the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. This paper proposes a new Boolean Satisfiability (SAT)-based algorithm for entailment in propositional circumscription that explores the relationship of propositional circumscription to minimal models. The new algorithm is inspired by ideas commonly used in SAT-based model checking, namely counterexample guided abstraction refinement. In addition, the new algorithm is refined to compute the theory closure for generalized close world assumption (GCWA). Experimental results show that the new algorithm can solve problem instances that other solutions are unable to solve.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Solving Linux Upgradeability Problems Using Boolean Optimization

Managing the software complexity of package-based systems can be regarded as one of the main challenges in software architectures. Upgrades are required on a short time basis and systems are expected to be reliable and consistent after that. For each package in the system, a set of dependencies and a set of conflicts have to be taken into account. Although this problem is computationally hard to solve, efficient tools are required. In the best scenario, the solutions provided should also be optimal in order to better fulfill users requirements and expectations. This paper describes two different tools, both based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT), for solving Linux upgradeability problems. The problem instances used in the evaluation of these tools were mainly obtained from real environments, and are subject to two different lexicographic optimization criteria. The developed tools can provide optimal solutions for many of the instances, but a few challenges remain. Moreover, it is our understanding that this problem has many similarities with other configuration problems, and therefore the same techniques can be used in other domains.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access