Researcher profile

Jion Hirose

Jion Hirose contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Gathering despite a linear number of weakly Byzantine agents

We study the gathering problem to make multiple agents initially scattered in arbitrary networks gather at a single node. There exist $k$ agents with unique identifiers (IDs) in the network, and $f$ of them are weakly Byzantine agents, which behave arbitrarily except for falsifying their IDs. The agents behave in synchronous rounds, and each node does not have any memory like a whiteboard. In the literature, there exists a gathering algorithm that tolerates any number of Byzantine agents, while the fastest gathering algorithm requires $Ω(f^2)$ non-Byzantine agents. This paper proposes an algorithm that solves the gathering problem efficiently with $Ω(f)$ non-Byzantine agents since there is a large gap between the number of non-Byzantine agents in previous works. The proposed algorithm achieves the gathering in $O(f\cdot|Λ_{good}|\cdot X(N))$ rounds in case of $9f+8\leq k$ and simultaneous startup if $N$ is given to agents, where $|Λ_{good}|$ is the length of the largest ID among non-Byzantine agents, and $X(n)$ is the number of rounds required to explore any network composed of $n$ nodes. This algorithm is faster than the most fault-tolerant existing algorithm and requires fewer non-Byzantine agents than the fastest algorithm if $n$ is given to agents, although the guarantees on simultaneous termination and startup delay are not the same. To achieve this property, we propose a new technique to simulate a Byzantine consensus algorithm for synchronous message-passing systems on agent systems.

preprint2020arXiv

Gathering with a strong team in weakly Byzantine environments

We study the gathering problem requiring a team of mobile agents to gather at a single node in arbitrary networks. The team consists of $k$ agents with unique identifiers (IDs), and $f$ of them are weakly Byzantine agents, which behave arbitrarily except falsifying their identifiers. The agents move in synchronous rounds and cannot leave any information on nodes. If the number of nodes $n$ is given to agents, the existing fastest algorithm tolerates any number of weakly Byzantine agents and achieves gathering with simultaneous termination in $O(n^4\cdot|Λ_{good}|\cdot X(n))$ rounds, where $|Λ_{good}|$ is the length of the maximum ID of non-Byzantine agents and $X(n)$ is the number of rounds required to explore any network composed of $n$ nodes. In this paper, we ask the question of whether we can reduce the time complexity if we have a strong team, i.e., a team with a few Byzantine agents, because not so many agents are subject to faults in practice. We give a positive answer to this question by proposing two algorithms in the case where at least $4f^2+9f+4$ agents exist. Both the algorithms take the upper bound $N$ of $n$ as input. The first algorithm achieves gathering with non-simultaneous termination in $O((f+|Λ_{good}|)\cdot X(N))$ rounds. The second algorithm achieves gathering with simultaneous termination in $O((f+|Λ_{all}|)\cdot X(N))$ rounds, where $|Λ_{all}|$ is the length of the maximum ID of all agents. The second algorithm significantly reduces the time complexity compared to the existing one if $n$ is given to agents and $|Λ_{all}|=O(|Λ_{good}|)$ holds.