Can electron and muon g−2 anomalies be jointly explained in SUSY?
The FNAL+BNL measurements for muon g−2 is 4.2σ above the SM prediction, and the Berkeley 133Cs measurement for the fine-structure constant αem leads to the SM prediction for electron g−2 which is 2.4σ above the experimental value. Hence, a joint explanation of both anomalies requires a positive contribution to muon g−2 and a negative contribution to electron g−2, which is rather challenging. In this work we explore the possibility of such a joint explanation in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). Assuming no universality between smuon and selectron soft masses, we find out a part of parameter space for a joint explanation at 2σ level, i.e., μM1,μM2<0, mL1,mE2<200 GeV, mL2 being much larger than the soft masses of other sleptons, ∣M1∣<125 GeV and μ<400 GeV. This part of parameter space can survive LHC and LEP constraints, but gives an over-abundance for dark matter if the bino-like lightest neutralino is assumed to be the dark matter candidate. With the assumption that the dark matter candidate is a superWIMP (say a pseudo-goldstino in multi-sector SUSY breaking scenarios, whose mass can be as light as GeV and produced from the late-decay of the thermally freeze-out lightest neutralino), the dark matter problem can be avoided. So, we conclude that the MSSM may give a joint explanation for the muon and electron g−2 anomalies at 2σ level (the muon g−2 anomaly can be even ameliorated to 1σ).