Paper detail

A joint explanation of W-mass and muon g-2 in 2HDM

Since both $W$-mass and muon $g-2$ can be affected by the mass splittings among extra Higgs bosons $(H,~A,~H^\pm)$ in a 2HDM, we take a model with $μ$-$τ$ LFV interactions to examine the two anomalies reported respectively by CDF II and FNAL. We obtain the following observations: (i) Combined with theoretical constraints, the CDF $W$-mass measurement disfavors $H$ or $A$ to degenerate in mass with $H^\pm$, but allows $H$ and $A$ to degenerate. The mass splitting between $H^\pm$ and $H/A$ is required to be larger than 10 GeV. The $m_{H^\pm}$ and $m_{A}$ are favored to be smaller than 650 GeV for $m_H<120$ GeV, and allowed to have more large values with increasing of $m_H$. (ii) After imposing other relevant experimental constraints, there are parameter spaces that simultaneously satisfy (at $2σ$ level) the CDF $W$-mass, the FNAL muon $g-2$ and the data of lepton universality in $τ$ decays, but the mass splittings among extra Higgs bosons are strictly constrained.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.