Can electron and muon g−2g-2 anomalies be jointly explained in SUSY?

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

The FNAL+BNL measurements for muon g−2g-2 is 4.2σ4.2σ above the SM prediction, and the Berkeley 133^{133}Cs measurement for the fine-structure constant αemα_{\rm em} leads to the SM prediction for electron g−2g-2 which is 2.4σ2.4σ above the experimental value. Hence, a joint explanation of both anomalies requires a positive contribution to muon g−2g-2 and a negative contribution to electron g−2g-2, which is rather challenging. In this work we explore the possibility of such a joint explanation in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). Assuming no universality between smuon and selectron soft masses, we find out a part of parameter space for a joint explanation at 2σ2σ level, i.e., μM1,μM2<0μM_1,μM_2<0, mL1,mE2<200m_{L1}, m_{E2}<200 GeV, mL2m_{L2} being much larger than the soft masses of other sleptons, ∣M1∣<125|M_1|<125 GeV and μ<400μ<400 GeV. This part of parameter space can survive LHC and LEP constraints, but gives an over-abundance for dark matter if the bino-like lightest neutralino is assumed to be the dark matter candidate. With the assumption that the dark matter candidate is a superWIMP (say a pseudo-goldstino in multi-sector SUSY breaking scenarios, whose mass can be as light as GeV and produced from the late-decay of the thermally freeze-out lightest neutralino), the dark matter problem can be avoided. So, we conclude that the MSSM may give a joint explanation for the muon and electron g−2g-2 anomalies at 2σ2σ level (the muon g−2g-2 anomaly can be even ameliorated to 1σ1σ).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.