Paper detail

Can electron and muon $g-2$ anomalies be jointly explained in SUSY?

The FNAL+BNL measurements for muon $g-2$ is $4.2σ$ above the SM prediction, and the Berkeley $^{133}$Cs measurement for the fine-structure constant $α_{\rm em}$ leads to the SM prediction for electron $g-2$ which is $2.4σ$ above the experimental value. Hence, a joint explanation of both anomalies requires a positive contribution to muon $g-2$ and a negative contribution to electron $g-2$, which is rather challenging. In this work we explore the possibility of such a joint explanation in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). Assuming no universality between smuon and selectron soft masses, we find out a part of parameter space for a joint explanation at $2σ$ level, i.e., $μM_1,μM_2<0$, $m_{L1}, m_{E2}<200$ GeV, $m_{L2}$ being much larger than the soft masses of other sleptons, $|M_1|<125$ GeV and $μ<400$ GeV. This part of parameter space can survive LHC and LEP constraints, but gives an over-abundance for dark matter if the bino-like lightest neutralino is assumed to be the dark matter candidate. With the assumption that the dark matter candidate is a superWIMP (say a pseudo-goldstino in multi-sector SUSY breaking scenarios, whose mass can be as light as GeV and produced from the late-decay of the thermally freeze-out lightest neutralino), the dark matter problem can be avoided. So, we conclude that the MSSM may give a joint explanation for the muon and electron $g-2$ anomalies at $2σ$ level (the muon $g-2$ anomaly can be even ameliorated to $1σ$).

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.