BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jiasi Chen

Jiasi Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningComputation and LanguageDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

OpenG2G: A Simulation Platform for AI Datacenter-Grid Runtime Coordination

AI's growing compute demand and new datacenter buildouts present major capacity and reliability challenges for the electricity grid, leading to multi-year interconnection delays for new datacenters and bottlenecking AI growth. To ease this strain, datacenters increasingly offer rapid power flexibility in response to grid signals, where the datacenter can increase or decrease its power consumption by adapting its workload in real time. In order to understand the impact of large datacenters on the grid and to facilitate the design of effective coordination strategies, we build OpenG2G, a simulation platform for AI datacenter-grid runtime coordination. We show that OpenG2G is capable of answering a wide range of coordination questions by allowing users to implement and compare various control paradigms (including classic, optimization, and learning-based controllers), and quantify how AI model and deployment choices affect datacenter flexibility and coordination outcomes. This versatility is enabled by OpenG2G's modular and extensible architecture: a datacenter backend driven by real measurements of production-grade AI services, a grid backend built on high-fidelity grid simulators, and a generic controller interface that closes the loop between them. We describe the design of OpenG2G and demonstrate its usefulness through realistic grid scenarios and AI workloads.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

VSPO: Vector-Steered Policy Optimization for Behavioral Control

Modern language models often need to optimize a primary accuracy objective while also accommodating secondary behavioral preferences, such as verbosity, agreeableness, or the level of technical expertise in its response. In practice, a base model may exhibit a desired behavior very rarely or not at all. Thus, endowing the model with a target behavior creates a sparse behavioral reward bottleneck. To address such multi-objective problems, we introduce Vector-Steered Policy Optimization (VSPO) which employs a steering vector associated with the target behavior to control the behavior intensity of the generated rollouts. VSPO is obtained by modifying GRPO to sample rollouts with varying steering intensities. This process can be interpreted as an on-policy latent self-distillation procedure where the model internalizes its steering vector. By varying steering intensities, VSPO upsamples rare behaviors and enriches rollout diversity, which alleviates the sparse reward issue and provably accelerates the policy optimization. Through comprehensive theory and experiments, we establish that VSPO has favorable properties compared to vanilla reward shaping and other alternative approaches. Specifically, under a bandit abstraction, VSPO provably achieves better iteration complexity than reward-shaped GRPO when the steering-induced distributions are sufficiently aligned with the target behavior. We evaluate VSPO across multiple reasoning benchmarks, including MATH and MMLU-Pro, for four target behaviors: explanation expertise, confidence expression, robustness to misleading context, and response verbosity. Our results show that VSPO consistently improves the control along target behavior while maintaining or improving task accuracy compared with reward shaping, teacher-trace distillation, and guidance-based baselines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

AutoBalance: Optimized Loss Functions for Imbalanced Data

Imbalanced datasets are commonplace in modern machine learning problems. The presence of under-represented classes or groups with sensitive attributes results in concerns about generalization and fairness. Such concerns are further exacerbated by the fact that large capacity deep nets can perfectly fit the training data and appear to achieve perfect accuracy and fairness during training, but perform poorly during test. To address these challenges, we propose AutoBalance, a bi-level optimization framework that automatically designs a training loss function to optimize a blend of accuracy and fairness-seeking objectives. Specifically, a lower-level problem trains the model weights, and an upper-level problem tunes the loss function by monitoring and optimizing the desired objective over the validation data. Our loss design enables personalized treatment for classes/groups by employing a parametric cross-entropy loss and individualized data augmentation schemes. We evaluate the benefits and performance of our approach for the application scenarios of imbalanced and group-sensitive classification. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate the benefits of AutoBalance over state-of-the-art approaches. Our experimental findings are complemented with theoretical insights on loss function design and the benefits of train-validation split. All code is available open-source.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Role of Dataset Quality and Heterogeneity in Model Confidence

Safety-critical applications require machine learning models that output accurate and calibrated probabilities. While uncalibrated deep networks are known to make over-confident predictions, it is unclear how model confidence is impacted by the variations in the data, such as label noise or class size. In this paper, we investigate the role of the dataset quality by studying the impact of dataset size and the label noise on the model confidence. We theoretically explain and experimentally demonstrate that, surprisingly, label noise in the training data leads to under-confident networks, while reduced dataset size leads to over-confident models. We then study the impact of dataset heterogeneity, where data quality varies across classes, on model confidence. We demonstrate that this leads to heterogenous confidence/accuracy behavior in the test data and is poorly handled by the standard calibration algorithms. To overcome this, we propose an intuitive heterogenous calibration technique and show that the proposed approach leads to improved calibration metrics (both average and worst-case errors) on the CIFAR datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access