BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jiankou Li

Jiankou Li appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
physics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksInformation RetrievalMachine Learning

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machines for Cold Start Recommendations

Restricted Boltzman Machines (RBMs) have been successfully used in recommender systems. However, as with most of other collaborative filtering techniques, it cannot solve cold start problems for there is no rating for a new item. In this paper, we first apply conditional RBM (CRBM) which could take extra information into account and show that CRBM could solve cold start problem very well, especially for rating prediction task. CRBM naturally combine the content and collaborative data under a single framework which could be fitted effectively. Experiments show that CRBM can be compared favourably with matrix factorization models, while hidden features learned from the former models are more easy to be interpreted.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Characters and patterns of communities in networks

In this paper, we propose some new notions to characterize and analyze the communities. The new notions are general characters of the communities or local structures of networks. At first, we introduce the notions of internal dominating set and external dominating set of a community. We show that most communities in real networks have a small internal dominating set and a small external dominating set, and that the internal dominating set of a community keeps much of the information of the community. Secondly, based on the notions of the internal dominating set and the external dominating set, we define an internal slope (ISlope, for short) and an external slope (ESlope, for short) to measure the internal heterogeneity and external heterogeneity of a community respectively. We show that the internal slope (ISlope) of a community largely determines the structure of the community, that most communities in real networks are heterogeneous, meaning that most of the communities have a core/periphery structure, and that both ISlopes and ESlopes (reflecting the structure of communities) of all the communities of a network approximately follow a normal distribution. Therefore typical values of both ISolpes and ESoples of all the communities of a given network are in a narrow interval, and there is only a small number of communities having ISlopes or ESlopes out of the range of typical values of the ISlopes and ESlopes of the network. Finally, we show that all the communities of the real networks we studied, have a three degree separation phenomenon, that is, the average distance of communities is approximately 3, implying a general property of true communities for many real networks, and that good community finding algorithms find communities that amplify clustering coefficients of the networks, for many real networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Community Structures Are Definable in Networks, and Universal in Real World

Community detecting is one of the main approaches to understanding networks \cite{For2010}. However it has been a longstanding challenge to give a definition for community structures of networks. Here we found that community structures are definable in networks, and are universal in real world. We proposed the notions of entropy- and conductance-community structure ratios. It was shown that the definitions of the modularity proposed in \cite{NG2004}, and our entropy- and conductance-community structures are equivalent in defining community structures of networks, that randomness in the ER model \cite{ER1960} and preferential attachment in the PA \cite{Bar1999} model are not mechanisms of community structures of networks, and that the existence of community structures is a universal phenomenon in real networks. Our results demonstrate that community structure is a universal phenomenon in the real world that is definable, solving the challenge of definition of community structures in networks. This progress provides a foundation for a structural theory of networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Community Structures Are Definable in Networks: A Structural Theory of Networks

We found that neither randomness in the ER model nor the preferential attachment in the PA model is the mechanism of community structures of networks, that community structures are universal in real networks, that community structures are definable in networks, that communities are interpretable in networks, and that homophyly is the mechanism of community structures and a structural theory of networks. We proposed the notions of entropy- and conductance-community structures. It was shown that the two definitions of the entropy- and conductance-community structures and the notion of modularity proposed by physicists are all equivalent in defining community structures of networks, that neither randomness in the ER model nor preferential attachment in the PA model is the mechanism of community structures of networks, and that the existence of community structures is a universal phenomenon in real networks. This poses a fundamental question: What are the mechanisms of community structures of real networks? To answer this question, we proposed a homophyly model of networks. It was shown that networks of our model satisfy a series of new topological, probabilistic and combinatorial principles, including a fundamental principle, a community structure principle, a degree priority principle, a widths principle, an inclusion and infection principle, a king node principle and a predicting principle etc. The new principles provide a firm foundation for a structural theory of networks. Our homophyly model demonstrates that homophyly is the underlying mechanism of community structures of networks, that nodes of the same community share common features, that power law and small world property are never obstacles of the existence of community structures in networks, that community structures are {\it definable} in networks, and that (natural) communities are {\it interpretable}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Evaluating community structure in large network with random walks

Community structure is one of the most important properties of networks. Most community algorithms are not suitable for large networks because of their time consuming. In fact there are lots of networks with millons even billons of nodes. In such case, most algorithms running in time O(n2logn) or even larger are not practical. What we need are linear or approximately linear time algorithm. Rising in response to such needs, we propose a quick methods to evaluate community structure in networks and then put forward a local community algorithm with nearly linear time based on random walks. Using our community evaluating measure, we could find some difference results from measures used before, i.e., the Newman Modularity. Our algorithm are effective in small benchmark networks with small less accuracy than more complex algorithms but a great of advantage in time consuming for large networks, especially super large networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Homophyly Networks -- A Structural Theory of Networks

A grand challenge in network science is apparently the missing of a structural theory of networks. The authors have showed that the existence of community structures is a universal phenomenon in real networks, and that neither randomness nor preferential attachment is a mechanism of community structures of network \footnote{A. Li, J. Li, and Y. Pan, Community structures are definable in networks, and universal in the real world, To appear.}. This poses a fundamental question: What are the mechanisms of community structures of real networks? Here we found that homophyly is the mechanism of community structures and a structural theory of networks. We proposed a homophyly model. It was shown that networks of our model satisfy a series of new topological, probabilistic and combinatorial principles, including a fundamental principle, a community structure principle, a degree priority principle, a widths principle, an inclusion and infection principle, a king node principle, and a predicting principle etc, leading to a structural theory of networks. Our model demonstrates that homophyly is the underlying mechanism of community structures of networks, that nodes of the same community share common features, that power law and small world property are never obstacles of the existence of community structures in networks, and that community structures are definable in networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access