Researcher profile

Jeff Kahn

Jeff Kahn contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Hitting times for Shamir's Problem

For fixed $r\geq 3$ and $n$ divisible by $r$, let ${\mathcal H}={\mathcal H}^r_{n,M}$ be the random $M$-edge $r$-graph on $V=\{1,\ldots ,n\}$; that is, ${\mathcal H}$ is chosen uniformly from the $M$-subsets of ${\mathcal K}:={V \choose r}$ ($:= \{\mbox{$r$-subsets of $V$}\}$). Shamir's Problem (circa 1980) asks, roughly, for what $M=M(n)$ is ${\mathcal H}$ likely to contain a perfect matching (that is, $n/r$ disjoint $r$-sets)? In 2008 Johansson, Vu and the author showed that this is true for $M>C_rn\log n$. More recently the author proved the asymptotically correct version of that result: for fixed $C> 1/r$ and $M> Cn\log n$, $P({\mathcal H} ~\mbox{contains a perfect matching})\rightarrow 1 \,\,\, \mbox{as $n\rightarrow\infty$}.$ The present work completes a proof, begun in that recent paper, of the definitive "hitting time" statement: $\mbox{Theorem.}$ If $A_1, \ldots ~$ is a uniform permutation of ${\mathcal K}$, ${\mathcal H}_t=\{A_1\dots A_t\}$, and \[ T=\min\{t:A_1\cup \cdots\cup A_t=V\}, \] then $P({\mathcal H}_T ~\mbox{contains a perfect matching})\rightarrow 1 \,\,\, \mbox{as $n\rightarrow\infty$}$.

preprint2020arXiv

Tuza's Conjecture for random graphs

A celebrated conjecture of Zs. Tuza says that in any (finite) graph, the minimum size of a cover of triangles by edges is at most twice the maximum size of a set of edge-disjoint triangles. Resolving a recent question of Bennett, Dudek, and Zerbib, we show that this is true for random graphs; more precisely: \[ \mbox{for any $p=p(n)$, $\mathbb P(\mbox{$G_{n,p}$ satisfies Tuza's Conjecture})\rightarrow 1 $ (as $n\rightarrow\infty$).} \]

preprint2010arXiv

Conditional negative association for competing urns

Competing urns refers to the random experiment where m balls are dropped, randomly and independently, into urns 1,...,n. Formally, we have a random map $σ$ from {1,...,m} to {1,...,n} with the $σ(i)$'s i.i.d. With $x_j$ the indicator of the event that at least $t_j$ balls land in urn j (for some threshold $t_j$), we prove conditional negative association for the random variables $x_1,...,x_n$. We mostly deal with the more general situation in which the $σ(i)$'s need not be identically distributed, proving results which imply conditional negative association in the i.i.d. case. Some of the results--particularly Lemma 8 on graph orientations--are thought to be of independent interest. We also give a counterexample to a negative correlation conjecture of D. Welsh, a strong version of a (still open) conjecture of G. Farr.

preprint2010arXiv

Left and right convergence of graphs with bounded degree

The theory of convergent graph sequences has been worked out in two extreme cases, dense graphs and bounded degree graphs. One can define convergence in terms of counting homomorphisms from fixed graphs into members of the sequence (left-convergence), or counting homomorphisms into fixed graphs (right-convergence). Under appropriate conditions, these two ways of defining convergence was proved to be equivalent in the dense case by Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós and Vesztergombi. In this paper a similar equivalence is established in the bounded degree case. In terms of statistical physics, the implication that left convergence implies right convergence means that for a left-convergent sequence, partition functions of a large class of statistical physics models converge. The proof relies on techniques from statistical physics, like cluster expansion and Dobrushin Uniqueness.