Paper detail

Hitting times for Shamir's Problem

For fixed $r\geq 3$ and $n$ divisible by $r$, let ${\mathcal H}={\mathcal H}^r_{n,M}$ be the random $M$-edge $r$-graph on $V=\{1,\ldots ,n\}$; that is, ${\mathcal H}$ is chosen uniformly from the $M$-subsets of ${\mathcal K}:={V \choose r}$ ($:= \{\mbox{$r$-subsets of $V$}\}$). Shamir's Problem (circa 1980) asks, roughly, for what $M=M(n)$ is ${\mathcal H}$ likely to contain a perfect matching (that is, $n/r$ disjoint $r$-sets)? In 2008 Johansson, Vu and the author showed that this is true for $M>C_rn\log n$. More recently the author proved the asymptotically correct version of that result: for fixed $C> 1/r$ and $M> Cn\log n$, $P({\mathcal H} ~\mbox{contains a perfect matching})\rightarrow 1 \,\,\, \mbox{as $n\rightarrow\infty$}.$ The present work completes a proof, begun in that recent paper, of the definitive "hitting time" statement: $\mbox{Theorem.}$ If $A_1, \ldots ~$ is a uniform permutation of ${\mathcal K}$, ${\mathcal H}_t=\{A_1\dots A_t\}$, and \[ T=\min\{t:A_1\cup \cdots\cup A_t=V\}, \] then $P({\mathcal H}_T ~\mbox{contains a perfect matching})\rightarrow 1 \,\,\, \mbox{as $n\rightarrow\infty$}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.