Hitting times for Shamir's Problem

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

For fixed r≥3r\geq 3 and nn divisible by rr, let H=Hn,Mr{\mathcal H}={\mathcal H}^r_{n,M} be the random MM-edge rr-graph on V={1,…,n}V=\{1,\ldots ,n\}; that is, H{\mathcal H} is chosen uniformly from the MM-subsets of K:=(Vr){\mathcal K}:={V \choose r} ($:= \{\mbox{$r−subsetsof-subsets of V$}\}$). Shamir's Problem (circa 1980) asks, roughly, for what M=M(n)M=M(n) is H{\mathcal H} likely to contain a perfect matching (that is, n/rn/r disjoint rr-sets)? In 2008 Johansson, Vu and the author showed that this is true for M>Crnlog⁡nM>C_rn\log n. More recently the author proved the asymptotically correct version of that result: for fixed C>1/rC> 1/r and M>Cnlog⁡nM> Cn\log n, $P({\mathcal H} ~\mbox{contains a perfect matching})\rightarrow 1 \,\,\, \mbox{as $n\rightarrow\infty$}.$ The present work completes a proof, begun in that recent paper, of the definitive "hitting time" statement: $\mbox{Theorem.}$ If A1,… A_1, \ldots ~ is a uniform permutation of K{\mathcal K}, Ht={A1…At}{\mathcal H}_t=\{A_1\dots A_t\}, and T=min⁡{t:A1∪⋯∪At=V}, T=\min\{t:A_1\cup \cdots\cup A_t=V\}, then $P({\mathcal H}_T ~\mbox{contains a perfect matching})\rightarrow 1 \,\,\, \mbox{as $n\rightarrow\infty$}$.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.