BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jay Sethuraman

Jay Sethuraman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A note on the rationing of divisible and indivisible goods in a general network

The study of matching theory has gained importance recently with applications in Kidney Exchange, House Allocation, School Choice etc. The general theme of these problems is to allocate goods in a fair manner amongst participating agents. The agents generally have a unit supply/demand of a good that they want to exchange with other agents. On the other hand, Bochet et al. study a more general version of the problem where they allow for agents to have arbitrary number of divisible goods to be rationed to other agents in the network. In this current work, our main focus is on non-bipartite networks where agents have arbitrary units of a homogeneous indivisible good that they want to exchange with their neighbors. Our aim is to develop mechanisms that would identify a fair and strategyproof allocation for the agents in the network. Thus, we generalize the kidney exchange problem to that of a network with arbitrary capacity of available goods. Our main idea is that this problem and a couple of other related versions of non-bipartite fair allocation problem can be suitably transformed to one of fair allocations on bipartite networks for which we know of well studied fair allocation mechanisms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On optimal ordering in the optimal stopping problem

In the classical optimal stopping problem, a player is given a sequence of random variables $X_1\ldots X_n$ with known distributions. After observing the realization of $X_i$, the player can either accept the observed reward from $X_i$ and stop, or reject the observed reward from $X_i$ and continue to observe the next variable $X_{i+1}$ in the sequence. Under any fixed ordering of the random variables, an optimal stopping policy, one that maximizes the player's expected reward, is given by the solution of a simple dynamic program. In this paper, we investigate the relatively less studied question of selecting the order in which the random variables should be observed so as to maximize the expected reward at the stopping time. To demonstrate the benefits of order selection, we prove a novel prophet inequality showing that, when the support of each random variable has size at most 2, the optimal ordering can achieve an expected reward that is within a factor of 1.25 of the expected hindsight maximum; this is an improvement over the corresponding factor of 2 for the worst-case ordering. We also provide a simple $O(n^2)$ algorithm for finding an optimal ordering in this case. Perhaps surprisingly, we demonstrate that a slightly more general case - each random variable $X_i$ is restricted to have 3-point support of form $\{0, m_i, 1\}$ - is NP-hard, and provide an FPTAS for that case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access