BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jason Tsay

Jason Tsay contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningSoftware Engineering

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Comments on Comments: Where Code Review and Documentation Meet

A central function of code review is to increase understanding; helping reviewers understand a code change aids in knowledge transfer and finding bugs. Comments in code largely serve a similar purpose, helping future readers understand the program. It is thus natural to study what happens when these two forms of understanding collide. We ask: what documentation-related comments do reviewers make and how do they affect understanding of the contribution? We analyze ca.700K review comments on 2,000 (Java and Python) GitHub projects, and propose several filters to identify which comments are likely to be either in response to a change in documentation and/or call for such a change. We identify 65K such cases. We next develop a taxonomy of the reviewer intents behind such "comments on comments". We find that achieving a shared understanding of the code is key: reviewer comments most often focused on clarification, followed by pointing out issues to fix, such as typos and outdated comments. Curiously, clarifying comments were frequently suggested (often verbatim) by the reviewer, indicating a desire to persist their understanding acquired during code review. We conclude with a discussion of implications of our comments-on-comments dataset for research on improving code review, including the potential benefits for automating code review.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Enabling Reproducibility and Meta-learning Through a Lifelong Database of Experiments (LDE)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) development is inherently iterative and experimental. Over the course of normal development, especially with the advent of automated AI, hundreds or thousands of experiments are generated and are often lost or never examined again. There is a lost opportunity to document these experiments and learn from them at scale, but the complexity of tracking and reproducing these experiments is often prohibitive to data scientists. We present the Lifelong Database of Experiments (LDE) that automatically extracts and stores linked metadata from experiment artifacts and provides features to reproduce these artifacts and perform meta-learning across them. We store context from multiple stages of the AI development lifecycle including datasets, pipelines, how each is configured, and training runs with information about their runtime environment. The standardized nature of the stored metadata allows for querying and aggregation, especially in terms of ranking artifacts by performance metrics. We exhibit the capabilities of the LDE by reproducing an existing meta-learning study and storing the reproduced metadata in our system. Then, we perform two experiments on this metadata: 1) examining the reproducibility and variability of the performance metrics and 2) implementing a number of meta-learning algorithms on top of the data and examining how variability in experimental results impacts recommendation performance. The experimental results suggest significant variation in performance, especially depending on dataset configurations; this variation carries over when meta-learning is built on top of the results, with performance improving when using aggregated results. This suggests that a system that automatically collects and aggregates results such as the LDE not only assists in implementing meta-learning but may also improve its performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access