BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jameson Cahill

Jameson Cahill contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.FAMachine LearningData Structures and AlgorithmsInformation Theorymath.ITmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Group-invariant max filtering

Given a real inner product space $V$ and a group $G$ of linear isometries, we construct a family of $G$-invariant real-valued functions on $V$ that we call max filters. In the case where $V=\mathbb{R}^d$ and $G$ is finite, a suitable max filter bank separates orbits, and is even bilipschitz in the quotient metric. In the case where $V=L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ and $G$ is the group of translation operators, a max filter exhibits stability to diffeomorphic distortion like that of the scattering transform introduced by Mallat. We establish that max filters are well suited for various classification tasks, both in theory and in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A note on scalable frames

We study the problem of determining whether a given frame is scalable, and when it is, understanding the set of all possible scalings. We show that for most frames this is a relatively simple task in that the frame is either not scalable or is scalable in a unique way, and to find this scaling we just have to solve a linear system. We also provide some insight into the set of all scalings when there is not a unique scaling. In particular, we show that this set is a convex polytope whose vertices correspond to minimal scalings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Full Spark Frames

Finite frame theory has a number of real-world applications. In applications like sparse signal processing, data transmission with robustness to erasures, and reconstruction without phase, there is a pressing need for deterministic constructions of frames with the following property: every size-M subcollection of the M-dimensional frame elements is a spanning set. Such frames are called full spark frames, and this paper provides new constructions using the discrete Fourier transform. Later, we prove that full spark Parseval frames are dense in the entire set of Parseval frames, meaning full spark frames are abundant, even if one imposes an additional tightness constraint. Finally, we prove that testing whether a given matrix is full spark is hard for NP under randomized polynomial-time reductions, indicating that deterministic full spark constructions are particularly significant because they guarantee a property which is otherwise difficult to check.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Constructing finite frames of a given spectrum and set of lengths

When constructing finite frames for a given application, the most important consideration is the spectrum of the frame operator. Indeed, the minimum and maximum eigenvalues of the frame operator are the optimal frame bounds, and the frame is tight precisely when this spectrum is constant. Often, the second-most important design consideration is the lengths of frame vectors: Gabor, wavelet, equiangular and Grassmannian frames are all special cases of equal norm frames, and unit norm tight frame-based encoding is known to be optimally robust against additive noise and erasures. We consider the problem of constructing frames whose frame operator has a given spectrum and whose vectors have prescribed lengths. For a given spectrum and set of lengths, the existence of such frames is characterized by the Schur-Horn Theorem---they exist if and only if the spectrum majorizes the squared lengths---the classical proof of which is nonconstructive. Certain construction methods, such as harmonic frames and spectral tetris, are known in the special case of unit norm tight frames, but even these provide but a few examples from the manifold of all such frames, the dimension of which is known and nontrivial. In this paper, we provide a new method for explicitly constructing any and all frames whose frame operator has a prescribed spectrum and whose vectors have prescribed lengths. The method itself has two parts. In the first part, one chooses eigensteps---a sequence of interlacing spectra---that transform the trivial spectrum into the desired one. The second part is to explicitly compute the frame vectors in terms of these eigensteps; though nontrivial, this process is nevertheless straightforward enough to be implemented by hand, involving only arithmetic, square roots and matrix multiplication.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Paulsen Problem in Operator Theory

The Paulsen Problem in Hilbert space frame theory has proved to be one of the most intractable problems in the field. We will help explain why by showing that this problem is equivalent to a fundamental, deep problem in operator theory. Along the way we will give a new exact computation for chordal distances, we will give a generalization of these problems and we will spell out exactly the complementary versions of the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Non-orthogonal fusion frames and the sparsity of fusion frame operators

Fusion frames have become a major tool in the implementation of distributed systems. The effectiveness of fusion frame applications in distributed systems is reflected in the efficiency of the end fusion process. This in turn is reflected in the efficiency of the inversion of the fusion frame operator $S_{\cW}$, which in turn is heavily dependent on the sparsity of $S_{\cW}$. We will show that sparsity of the fusion frame operator naturally exists by introducing a notion of {\it non-orthogonal fusion frames}. We show that for a fusion frame $\{W_i,v_i\}_{i\in I}$, if $\text{dim}(W_i)=k_i$, then the matrix of the non-orthogonal fusion frame operator $\cSw$ has in its corresponding location at most a $k_i\times k_i$ block matrix. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for which the new fusion frame operator $\cSw$ is diagonal and/or a multiple of an identity. A set of other critical questions are also addressed. A scheme of {\it multiple fusion frames} whose corresponding fusion frame operator becomes an diagonal operator is also examined.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access