Source author record

Jacob Carruth

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.CA math.FA math.NT math.ST Methodology Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

The Beurling-Selberg Box Minorant Problem via Linear Programming Bounds

In this paper we investigate a high dimensional version of Selberg's minorant problem for the indicator function of an interval. In particular, we study the corresponding problem of minorizing the indicator function of the box $Q_{N}=[-1,1]^N$ by a function whose Fourier transform is supported in the same box $Q_N$ . We show that when the dimension is sufficiently large there are no minorants with positive mass and we give an explicit lower bound for such dimension. On the other hand, we explicitly construct minorants for dimensions $1,2,3,4$ and $5$ and, as an application, we use them to produce an improved diophantine inequality for exponential sums.

preprint2012arXiv

A comparison of the discrete Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic and the Euclidean distance

Goodness-of-fit tests gauge whether a given set of observations is consistent (up to expected random fluctuations) with arising as independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) draws from a user-specified probability distribution known as the "model." The standard gauges involve the discrepancy between the model and the empirical distribution of the observed draws. Some measures of discrepancy are cumulative; others are not. The most popular cumulative measure is the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic; when all probability distributions under consideration are discrete, a natural noncumulative measure is the Euclidean distance between the model and the empirical distributions. In the present paper, both mathematical analysis and its illustration via various data sets indicate that the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic tends to be more powerful than the Euclidean distance when there is a natural ordering for the values that the draws can take -- that is, when the data is ordinal -- whereas the Euclidean distance is more reliable and more easily understood than the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic when there is no natural ordering (or partial order) -- that is, when the data is nominal.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.