Source author record

Jaber Kakar

Jaber Kakar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
6topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Robust Interference Management for SISO Systems with Multiple Over-the-Air Computations

In this paper, we consider the over-the-air computation of sums. Specifically, we wish to compute $M\geq 2$ sums $s_m=\sum_{k\in\mathcal{D}m}x_k$ over a shared complex-valued MAC at once with minimal mean-squared error ($\mathsf{MSE}$). Finding appropriate Tx-Rx scaling factors balance between a low error in the computation of $s_n$ and the interference induced by it in the computation of other sums $s_m$, $m\neq n$. In this paper, we are interested in designing an optimal Tx-Rx scaling policy that minimizes the mean-squared error $\max_{m\in[1:M]}\mathsf{MSE}_m$ subject to a Tx power constraint with maximum power $P$. We show that an optimal design of the Tx-Rx scaling policy $\left(\bar{\mathbf{a}},\bar{\mathbf{b}}\right)$ involves optimizing (a) their phases and (b) their absolute values in order to (i) decompose the computation of $M$ sums into, respectively, $M_R$ and $M_I$ ($M=M_R+M_I$) calculations over real and imaginary part of the Rx signal and (ii) to minimize the computation over each part -- real and imaginary -- individually. The primary focus of this paper is on (b). We derive conditions (i) on the feasibility of the optimization problem and (ii) on the Tx-Rx scaling policy of a local minimum for $M_w=2$ computations over the real ($w=R$) or the imaginary ($w=I$) part. Extensive simulations over a single Rx chain for $M_w=2$ show that the level of interference in terms of $ΔD=|\mathcal{D}_2|-|\mathcal{D}_1|$ plays an important role on the ergodic worst-case $\mathsf{MSE}$. At very high $\mathsf{SNR}$, typically only the sensor with the weakest channel transmits with full power while all remaining sensors transmit with less to limit the interference. Interestingly, we observe that due to residual interference, the ergodic worst-case $\mathsf{MSE}$ is not vanishing; rather, it converges to $\frac{|\mathcal{D}_1||\mathcal{D}_2|}{K}$ as $\mathsf{SNR}\rightarrow\infty$.

preprint2020arXiv

Uplink-Downlink Tradeoff in Secure Distributed Matrix Multiplication

In secure distributed matrix multiplication (SDMM) the multiplication $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}$ from two private matrices $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ is outsourced by a user to $N$ distributed servers. In $\ell$-SDMM, the goal is to a design a joint communication-computation procedure that optimally balances conflicting communication and computation metrics without leaking any information on both $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ to any set of $\ell\leq N$ servers. To this end, the user applies coding with $\tilde{\mathbf{A}}_i$ and $\tilde{\mathbf{B}}_i$ representing encoded versions of $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ destined to the $i$-th server. Now, SDMM involves multiple tradeoffs. One such tradeoff is the tradeoff between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) costs. To find a good balance between these two metrics, we propose two schemes which we term USCSA and GSCSA that are based on secure cross subspace alignment (SCSA). We show that there are various scenarios where they outperform existing SDMM schemes from the literature with respect to the UL-DL efficiency. Next, we implement schemes from the literature, including USCSA and GSCSA, and test their performance on Amazon EC2. Our numerical results show that USCSA and GSCSA establish a good balance between the time spend on the communication and computation in SDMMs. This is because they combine advantages of polynomial codes, namely low time for the upload of $\left(\tilde{\mathbf{A}}_i,\tilde{\mathbf{B}}_i\right)_{i=1}^{N}$ and the computation of $\mathbf{O}_i=\tilde{\mathbf{A}}_i\tilde{\mathbf{B}}_i$, with those of SCSA, being a low timing overhead for the download of $\left(\mathbf{O}_i\right)_{i=1}^{N}$ and the decoding of $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}$.