BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. Woo

J. Woo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMhep-exnucl-ex

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The physical connection between central stellar surface density and stellar spin in SAMI and MaNGA nearby galaxies

The stellar surface density within the inner 1 kpc ($Σ_{1}$) has become a popular tool for understanding the growth of galaxies and its connection with the quenching of star formation. The emerging picture suggests that building a central dense core is a necessary condition for quenching. However, it is not clear whether changes in $Σ_{1}$ trace changes in stellar kinematics and the growth of dispersion-dominated bulges. In this paper, we combine imaging from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with stellar kinematics from the Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral-field unit (SAMI) and Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) surveys to quantify the correlation between $Σ_{1}$ and the proxy for stellar spin parameter within one effective radius ($λ_{re}$) for 1599 nearby galaxies. We show that, on the star-forming main sequence and at fixed stellar mass, changes in $Σ_{1}$ are mirrored by changes in $λ_{re}$. While forming stars, main sequence galaxies remain rotationally-dominated systems, with their $Σ_{1}$ increasing but their stellar spin staying either constant or slightly increasing. The picture changes below the main sequence, where $Σ_{1}$ and $λ_{re}$ are no longer correlated. Passive systems show a narrower range of $Σ_{1}$, but a wider range of $λ_{re}$ compared to star-forming galaxies. Our results indicate that, from a structural point of view, passive galaxies are a more heterogeneous population than star-forming systems, and may have followed a variety of evolutionary paths. This also suggests that, if dispersion-dominated bulges still grow significantly at $z\sim$0, this generally takes place during, or after, the quenching phase.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Internal Consistency of Neutron Coherent Scattering Length Measurements from Neutron Interferometry and from Neutron Gravity Reflectometry for Exotic Yukawa Analyses

Many theories beyond the Standard Model postulate short-range modifications to gravity which produce deviations of Newton&#39;s gravitational potential from a strict $1/r$ dependence. It is common to analyze experiments searching for these modifications using a potential of the form $V^{\prime}(r)=-\frac{GMm}{r} [1+α\exp{(-r/λ)}]$. The best present constraints on $α$ for $λ<100$\,nm come from neutron scattering and often employ comparisons of different measurements of the coherent neutron scattering amplitudes $b$. We analyze the internal consistency of existing data from two different types of measurements of low energy neutron scattering amplitudes: neutron interferometry, which involves squared momentum transfers $q^{2}=0$, and neutron gravity reflectometry, which involves squared momentum transfers $q^{2}=8mV_{opt}$ where $m$ is the neutron mass and $V_{opt}$ is the neutron optical potential of the medium. We show that the fractional difference $\frac{Δb}{|b|}$ averaged over the 7 elements where high precision data exists on the same material from both measurement methods is $[2.2 \pm 1.4] \times 10^{-4}$. We also show that $\frac{Δb}{|b|}$ for this data is insensitive both to exotic Yukawa interactions and also to the electromagnetic neutron-atom interactions proportional to the neutron-electron scattering length $b_{ne}$ and the neutron polarizability scattering amplitude $b_{pol}$. This result will be useful in any future global analyses of neutron scattering data to determine $b_{ne}$ and bound $α$ and $λ$. We also discuss how various neutron interferometric and scattering techniques with cold and ultracold neutrons can be used to improve the precision of $b$ measurements and make some specific proposals.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

LRP2020: Machine Learning Advantages in Canadian Astrophysics

The application of machine learning (ML) methods to the analysis of astrophysical datasets is on the rise, particularly as the computing power and complex algorithms become more powerful and accessible. As the field of ML enjoys a continuous stream of breakthroughs, its applications demonstrate the great potential of ML, ranging from achieving tens of millions of times increase in analysis speed (e.g., modeling of gravitational lenses or analysing spectroscopic surveys) to solutions of previously unsolved problems (e.g., foreground subtraction or efficient telescope operations). The number of astronomical publications that include ML has been steadily increasing since 2010. With the advent of extremely large datasets from a new generation of surveys in the 2020s, ML methods will become an indispensable tool in astrophysics. Canada is an unambiguous world leader in the development of the field of machine learning, attracting large investments and skilled researchers to its prestigious AI Research Institutions. This provides a unique opportunity for Canada to also be a world leader in the application of machine learning in the field of astrophysics, and foster the training of a new generation of highly skilled researchers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access