Paper detail

Satellite Quenching, Galaxy Inner Density and the Halo Environment

Using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we adopt the sSFR-$Σ_{1kpc}$ diagram as a diagnostic tool to understand quenching in different environments. sSFR is the specific star formation rate, and $Σ_{1kpc}$ is the stellar surface density in the inner kpc. Although both the host halo mass and group-centric distance affect the satellite population, we find that these can be characterised by a single number, the quenched fraction, such that key features of the sSFR-$Σ_{1kpc}$ diagram vary smoothly with this proxy for the "environment". Particularly, the sSFR of star-forming galaxies decreases smoothly with this quenched fraction, the sSFR of satellites being 0.1 dex lower than in the field. Furthermore, $Σ_{1kpc}$ of the transition galaxies (i.e., the "green valley" or GV) decreases smoothly with the environment, by as much as 0.2 dex for $M_* = 10^{9.75-10} M_{\odot}$ from the field, and decreasing for satellites in larger halos and at smaller radial distances within same-mass halos. We interpret this shift as indicating the relative importance of today's field quenching track vs. the cluster quenching track. These environmental effects in the sSFR-$Σ_{1kpc}$ diagram are most significant in our lowest mass range ($9.75 < \log M_{*}/M_{\odot} < 10$). One feature that is shared between all environments is that at a given $M_{*}$ quenched galaxies have about 0.2-0.3 dex higher $Σ_{1kpc}$ than the star-forming population. These results indicate that either $Σ_{1kpc}$ increases (subsequent to satellite quenching), or $Σ_{1kpc}$ for individual galaxies remains unchanged, but the original $M_*$ or the time of quenching is significantly different from those now in the GV.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.