Satellite Quenching, Galaxy Inner Density and the Halo Environment

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we adopt the sSFR-Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} diagram as a diagnostic tool to understand quenching in different environments. sSFR is the specific star formation rate, and Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} is the stellar surface density in the inner kpc. Although both the host halo mass and group-centric distance affect the satellite population, we find that these can be characterised by a single number, the quenched fraction, such that key features of the sSFR-Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} diagram vary smoothly with this proxy for the "environment". Particularly, the sSFR of star-forming galaxies decreases smoothly with this quenched fraction, the sSFR of satellites being 0.1 dex lower than in the field. Furthermore, Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} of the transition galaxies (i.e., the "green valley" or GV) decreases smoothly with the environment, by as much as 0.2 dex for M∗=109.75−10M⊙M_* = 10^{9.75-10} M_{\odot} from the field, and decreasing for satellites in larger halos and at smaller radial distances within same-mass halos. We interpret this shift as indicating the relative importance of today's field quenching track vs. the cluster quenching track. These environmental effects in the sSFR-Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} diagram are most significant in our lowest mass range (9.75<log⁡M∗/M⊙<109.75 < \log M_{*}/M_{\odot} < 10). One feature that is shared between all environments is that at a given M∗M_{*} quenched galaxies have about 0.2-0.3 dex higher Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} than the star-forming population. These results indicate that either Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} increases (subsequent to satellite quenching), or Σ1kpcΣ_{1kpc} for individual galaxies remains unchanged, but the original M∗M_* or the time of quenching is significantly different from those now in the GV.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.