Paper detail

Internal Consistency of Neutron Coherent Scattering Length Measurements from Neutron Interferometry and from Neutron Gravity Reflectometry for Exotic Yukawa Analyses

Many theories beyond the Standard Model postulate short-range modifications to gravity which produce deviations of Newton&#39;s gravitational potential from a strict $1/r$ dependence. It is common to analyze experiments searching for these modifications using a potential of the form $V^{\prime}(r)=-\frac{GMm}{r} [1+α\exp{(-r/λ)}]$. The best present constraints on $α$ for $λ<100$\,nm come from neutron scattering and often employ comparisons of different measurements of the coherent neutron scattering amplitudes $b$. We analyze the internal consistency of existing data from two different types of measurements of low energy neutron scattering amplitudes: neutron interferometry, which involves squared momentum transfers $q^{2}=0$, and neutron gravity reflectometry, which involves squared momentum transfers $q^{2}=8mV_{opt}$ where $m$ is the neutron mass and $V_{opt}$ is the neutron optical potential of the medium. We show that the fractional difference $\frac{Δb}{|b|}$ averaged over the 7 elements where high precision data exists on the same material from both measurement methods is $[2.2 \pm 1.4] \times 10^{-4}$. We also show that $\frac{Δb}{|b|}$ for this data is insensitive both to exotic Yukawa interactions and also to the electromagnetic neutron-atom interactions proportional to the neutron-electron scattering length $b_{ne}$ and the neutron polarizability scattering amplitude $b_{pol}$. This result will be useful in any future global analyses of neutron scattering data to determine $b_{ne}$ and bound $α$ and $λ$. We also discuss how various neutron interferometric and scattering techniques with cold and ultracold neutrons can be used to improve the precision of $b$ measurements and make some specific proposals.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.