Source author record

J. Souhabi

J. Souhabi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Re-examination of the SiGe Raman spectra - Linear chain approximation and ab initio calculations

We propose a (three-dimension) -> (one-dimension) shift of paradigm for basic understanding of Raman spectra of random Si-Ge. Fair contour modeling of Raman spectra is achieved along the linear chain approximation via 1D-cluster version of the phenomenological Percolation scheme, originally developed for zincblende alloys, after ab initio calibration of the intrinsic Si-Si, Ge-Ge and Si-Ge Raman efficiencies. The 1D-cluster scheme introduces a seven-oscillator [1x(Ge-Ge), 4x(Si-Ge), 2x(Si-Si)] Raman behavior for SiGe, which considerably deviates from the currently admitted six-oscillator [1x(Ge-Ge), 1x(Si-Ge), 4x(Si-Si)] one. The 1D-cluster re-assignment of Raman lines is based on remarkable intensity-interplays with composition, known from the literature, but so far not properly understood. It is independently supported by ab initio calculation of the frequencies of bond-stretching modes along prototype impurity motifs taken as quasi-linear. Different numbers of Raman modes per bond indicate different sensitivities to the local environment of the Ge-Ge (insensitive), Si-Si (sensitive to 1st neighbors) and Si-Ge (sensitive to 2nd neighbors) bond-stretchings. Last, we compare the SiGe Percolation scheme with the current version for zincblende alloys, using GaAsP as a natural reference. The SiGe vs. GaAsP comparison is supported by ab initio calculation of local lattice relaxation/dynamics related to prototype impurity motifs that are directly transposable to the two crystal structures.