BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. I. Katz

J. I. Katz contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.HEastro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Searching for Periodicity in FRB 20240114A

FRB 20240114A is extraordinarily active, and therefore presents an opportunity to search for the periodicity predicted by magnetar models of Fast Radio Bursts (FRB). Zhang, et al. (2025) observed 11,553 bursts, including 3196 on MJD 60381 (March 12, 2024). We find no significant peak in the periodogram of those bursts, which occur within 15628 s, short enough that even with a characteristic slowing age of 1 year a signal with period $\ge 0.1\,$s it would not significantly dephase within the observation. Introducing modulation artificially shows that an amplitude of 0.15 would have been detected robustly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Precession and Jitter in FRB 180916B

Recent CHIME/FRB observations of the periodic repeating FRB 180916B have produced a homogeneous sample of 44 bursts. These permit a redetermination of the modulation period and phase window, in agreement with earlier results. If the periodicity results from the precession of an accretion disc, in analogy with those of Her X-1, SS 433, and many other superorbital periods, the width of the observable phase window indicates that the disc axis jitters by an angle of about 0.14 of the inclination angle, similar to the ratio of 0.14 in the well-observed jittering jet source SS 433.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Absence of Periodicity in Repeating FRB

Popular Fast Radio Burst models involve rotating magnetized neutron stars, yet no rotational periodicities have been found. Small datasets exclude exact periodicity in FRB 121102. Recent observations of over 1500 bursts from each of FRB 121102 and FRB 20201124A also have not found periodicity. Periodograms of events with cosine-distributed random offsets as large as $\pm 0.6 P$ from a strict period $P$ would still reveal the underlying periodicity. The sensitivity of periodograms of long data series, such as bursts observed on multiple days, to slow frequency drifts is mitigated by considering individual observing sessions, and results are shown for FRB 121102. Models of repeating FRB without intrinsic periodicity are considered, as are models of apparently non-repeating FRB.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Environment and Constraints on the Mass of FRB 190520B

Recent observations of FRB 20190520B have revealed rapid fluctuation of its Dispersion Measure within apparently fixed bounds, as well as a reversal of its Rotation Measure. The fluctuations of Dispersion Measure are uncorrelated with the intervals between bursts, setting upper bounds $\sim 10\,$s on any characteristic time scale of the dispersing region; it must be very compact. Measurements of the full dependence of the dispersive time delay on frequency may determine the actual electron density and the size of this region. It is possible to set a lower bound on the mass of the FRB source from constraints on the size of the dispersing region and its time scale of variation. Comparison of the variations of DM and RM leads to an estimate of the magnetic field $\sim 500\,μ$G.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Sources of Apparently Non-Repeating FRB

There are insufficient catastrophic events (collapse, explosion or merger of stars or compact objects) to explain the cosmologically local rate of apparently non-repeating FRB if each such catastrophic event produces a single FRB. Unless produced by some novel and unsuspected but comparatively frequent event, apparently non-repeating FRB must actually repeat many times in the lifetimes of their sources. Yet no such infrequent repetitions (in contrast to the frequent activity of FRB known to repeat) have been observed, constraining their repetition rates and active lifetimes. The absence of more frequent weaker but detectable repetitive outbursts in apparent non-repeaters resembles the distribution of SGR outbursts, with a large gap between giant outbursts and lesser outbursts. This suggests mini-SGR as sources, more energetic than SGR 1935$+$2154 associated with FRB 200428 but less energetic than SGR 1806$-$20 that had no associated FRB. Their largest radio outbursts would, at cosmological distances, be apparently non-repeating FRB and their X-ray and gamma-ray outbursts would be undetectable. The large gap between the strongest outburst of FRB 200428 and its lesser outbursts resembles the gamma-ray properties of individual well-observed SGR; at twenty times its actual distance, FRB 200428 would have been an apparent non-repeater.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Arrokoth's Necklace

Flyby images of (486958) Arrokoth (Ultima Thule, 2014 MU$_{69}$) show a comparatively bright "necklace" in the neck, or cleft between its two lobes, in contrast to its generally low albedo. We suggest that the necklace may be the result of thermally controlled ice deposition. The necklace is found in the most (orbitally averaged) shaded part of its surface. It may consist of clean, high albedo, ice condensed from vapor sublimed by dirty, low albedo, ice elsewhere; clean ice accumulates where the maximum temperatures are the lowest. Ammonia and propane have the necessary mesovolatile vapor pressure. Surrounding gas in the proto-Solar System would facilitate redeposition of molecules sublimed by warmer parts of the surface into the cleft, as well as smoothing the surface and explaining, by hydrodynamic drag, Arrokoth's slow (compared to its breakup rate) rotation. Alternatively, a layer of hoarfrost thick enough ($\gtrsim 0.1\,μ$) to have a high albedo could have formed more recently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Are Fast Radio Bursts Made By Neutron Stars?

Popular models of repeating Fast Radio Bursts (and perhaps of all Fast Radio Bursts) involve neutron stars because of their high rotational or magnetostatic energy densities. These models take one of two forms: giant but rare pulsar-like pulses like those of Rotating RAdio Transients and outbursts like those of Soft Gamma Repeaters. Here I collate the evidence, recently strengthened, against these models, including the absence of Galactic micro-FRB, and attribute the 16 day periodicity of FRB 180916.J0158+65 to the precession of a jet produced by a massive black hole's accretion disc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Searching for Galactic Micro-FRB with Lunar Scattering

Does the Galaxy contain sources of micro-FRB, lower energy events resembling the known FRB but detectable only at Galactic distances? The answer to this question is essential to determining the nature of FRB sources. At typical ($10$ kpc) Galactic distances a burst would be about 117 dB brighter than at a "cosmological" ($z = 1$) distance. The radiation of Galactic micro-FRB, if they exist, could be detected after Lunar reflection, or an upper bound on their rate set, by a modest (20 m at 1.4 GHz) radio telescope staring at the Moon. It would have all-sky sensitivity. The delay between detection of direct (by STARE2 or dipoles) and Lunar-scattered radiation would restrict a burst's position to a narrow arc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access