Researcher profile

J. Goikoetxea

J. Goikoetxea contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - Baseline
1works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multiplet Effects in the Electronic Correlation of One-Dimensional Magnetic Transition-Metal Oxides on Metals

We use the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) method to calculate the Hubbard $U$ parameter in four one-dimensional magnetic transition metal atom oxides of composition XO$_2$ (X = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) on Ir(100). In addition to the expected screening of the oxide, i.e., a significant reduction of the $U$ value by the presence of the metal substrate, we find a strong dependence on the electronic configuration (multiplet) of the X($d$) orbital. Each particular electronic configuration attained by atom X is dictated by the O ligands, as well as by the charge transfer and hybridization with the Ir(100) substrate. We find that MnO$_2$ and NiO$_2$ chains exhibit two different screening regimes, while the case of CoO$_2$ is somewhere in between. The electronic structure of the MnO$_2$ chain remains almost unchanged upon adsorption. Therefore, in this regime, the additional screening is predominantly generated by the electrons of the neighboring metal surface atoms. The screening strength for NiO$_2$/Ir(100) is found to depend on the Ni($d$) configuration in the adsorbed state. The case of FeO$_2$ shows an exceptional behavior, as it is the only insulating system in the absence of metallic substrate and, thus, it has the largest $U$ value. However, this value is significantly reduced by the two mentioned screening effects after adsorption.