Source author record

J. Goikoetxea

J. Goikoetxea appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multiplet Effects in the Electronic Correlation of One-Dimensional Magnetic Transition-Metal Oxides on Metals

We use the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA) method to calculate the Hubbard $U$ parameter in four one-dimensional magnetic transition metal atom oxides of composition XO$_2$ (X = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) on Ir(100). In addition to the expected screening of the oxide, i.e., a significant reduction of the $U$ value by the presence of the metal substrate, we find a strong dependence on the electronic configuration (multiplet) of the X($d$) orbital. Each particular electronic configuration attained by atom X is dictated by the O ligands, as well as by the charge transfer and hybridization with the Ir(100) substrate. We find that MnO$_2$ and NiO$_2$ chains exhibit two different screening regimes, while the case of CoO$_2$ is somewhere in between. The electronic structure of the MnO$_2$ chain remains almost unchanged upon adsorption. Therefore, in this regime, the additional screening is predominantly generated by the electrons of the neighboring metal surface atoms. The screening strength for NiO$_2$/Ir(100) is found to depend on the Ni($d$) configuration in the adsorbed state. The case of FeO$_2$ shows an exceptional behavior, as it is the only insulating system in the absence of metallic substrate and, thus, it has the largest $U$ value. However, this value is significantly reduced by the two mentioned screening effects after adsorption.