BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Iolanda Leite

Iolanda Leite contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
RoboticsArtificial Intelligencecs.CYeess.ASHuman-Computer InteractionMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Robot Duck Debugging: Can Attentive Listening Improve Problem Solving?

While thinking aloud has been reported to positively affect problem-solving, the effects of the presence of an embodied entity (e.g., a social robot) to whom words can be directed remain mostly unexplored. In this work, we investigated the role of a robot in a "rubber duck debugging" setting, by analyzing how a robot's listening behaviors could support a thinking-aloud problem-solving session. Participants completed two different tasks while speaking their thoughts aloud to either a robot or an inanimate object (a giant rubber duck). We implemented and tested two types of listener behavior in the robot: a rule-based heuristic and a deep-learning-based model. In a between-subject user study with 101 participants, we evaluated how the presence of a robot affected users' engagement in thinking aloud, behavior during the task, and self-reported user experience. In addition, we explored the impact of the two robot listening behaviors on those measures. In contrast to prior work, our results indicate that neither the rule-based heuristic nor the deep learning robot conditions improved performance or perception of the task, compared to an inanimate object. We discuss potential explanations and shed light on the feasibility of designing social robots as assistive tools in thinking-aloud problem-solving tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Interactive Disambiguation for Behavior Tree Execution

In recent years, robots are used in an increasing variety of tasks, especially by small- and medium- sized enterprises. These tasks are usually fast-changing, they have a collaborative scenario and happen in unpredictable environments with possible ambiguities. It is important to have methods capable of generating robot programs easily, that are made as general as possible by handling uncertainties. We present a system that integrates a method to learn Behavior Trees (BTs) from demonstration for pick and place tasks, with a framework that uses verbal interaction to ask follow-up clarification questions to resolve ambiguities. During the execution of a task, the system asks for user input when there is need to disambiguate an object in the scene, when the targets of the task are objects of a same type that are present in multiple instances. The integrated system is demonstrated on different scenarios of a pick and place task, with increasing level of ambiguities. The code used for this paper is made publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Gesticulator: A framework for semantically-aware speech-driven gesture generation

During speech, people spontaneously gesticulate, which plays a key role in conveying information. Similarly, realistic co-speech gestures are crucial to enable natural and smooth interactions with social agents. Current end-to-end co-speech gesture generation systems use a single modality for representing speech: either audio or text. These systems are therefore confined to producing either acoustically-linked beat gestures or semantically-linked gesticulation (e.g., raising a hand when saying "high"): they cannot appropriately learn to generate both gesture types. We present a model designed to produce arbitrary beat and semantic gestures together. Our deep-learning based model takes both acoustic and semantic representations of speech as input, and generates gestures as a sequence of joint angle rotations as output. The resulting gestures can be applied to both virtual agents and humanoid robots. Subjective and objective evaluations confirm the success of our approach. The code and video are available at the project page https://svito-zar.github.io/gesticulator .

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and its progressively wider impact on many sectors across the society requires an assessment of its effect on sustainable development. Here we analyze published evidence of positive or negative impacts of AI on the achievement of each of the 17 goals and 169 targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We find that AI can support the achievement of 128 targets across all SDGs, but it may also inhibit 58 targets. Notably, AI enables new technologies that improve efficiency and productivity, but it may also lead to increased inequalities among and within countries, thus hindering the achievement of the 2030 Agenda. The fast development of AI needs to be supported by appropriate policy and regulation. Otherwise, it would lead to gaps in transparency, accountability, safety and ethical standards of AI-based technology, which could be detrimental towards the development and sustainable use of AI. Finally, there is a lack of research assessing the medium- and long-term impacts of AI. It is therefore essential to reinforce the global debate regarding the use of AI and to develop the necessary regulatory insight and oversight for AI-based technologies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access