Source author record

Ioana O. Bercea

Ioana O. Bercea appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Computational Geometry Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Robotics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Upper Tail Analysis of Bucket Sort and Random Tries

Bucket Sort is known to run in expected linear time when the input keys are distributed independently and uniformly at random in the interval $[0,1)$. The analysis holds even when a quadratic time algorithm is used to sort the keys in each bucket. We show how to obtain linear time guarantees on the running time of Bucket Sort that hold with very high probability. Specifically, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of the exponent in the upper tail probability of the running time of Bucket Sort. We consider large additive deviations from the expectation, of the form $cn$ for large enough (constant) $c$, where $n$ is the number of keys that are sorted. Our analysis shows a profound difference between variants of Bucket Sort that use a quadratic time algorithm within each bucket and variants that use a $Θ(b\log b)$ time algorithm for sorting $b$ keys in a bucket. When a quadratic time algorithm is used to sort the keys in a bucket, the probability that Bucket Sort takes $cn$ more time than expected is exponential in $Θ(\sqrt{n}\log n)$. When a $Θ(b\log b)$ algorithm is used to sort the keys in a bucket, the exponent becomes $Θ(n)$. We prove this latter theorem by showing an upper bound on the tail of a random variable defined on tries, a result which we believe is of independent interest. This result also enables us to analyze the upper tail probability of a well-studied trie parameter, the external path length, and show that the probability that it deviates from its expected value by an additive factor of $cn$ is exponential in $Θ(n)$.

preprint2016arXiv

Minimizing Uncertainty through Sensor Placement with Angle Constraints

We study the problem of sensor placement in environments in which localization is a necessity, such as ad-hoc wireless sensor networks that allow the placement of a few anchors that know their location or sensor arrays that are tracking a target. In most of these situations, the quality of localization depends on the relative angle between the target and the pair of sensors observing it. In this paper, we consider placing a small number of sensors which ensure good angular $α$-coverage: given $α$ in $[0,π/2]$, for each target location $t$, there must be at least two sensors $s_1$ and $s_2$ such that the $\angle(s_1 t s_2)$ is in the interval $[α, π-α]$. One of the main difficulties encountered in such problems is that since the constraints depend on at least two sensors, building a solution must account for the inherent dependency between selected sensors, a feature that generic Set Cover techniques do not account for. We introduce a general framework that guarantees an angular coverage that is arbitrarily close to $α$ for any $α<= π/3$ and apply it to a variety of problems to get bi-criteria approximations. When the angular coverage is required to be at least a constant fraction of $α$, we obtain results that are strictly better than what standard geometric Set Cover methods give. When the angular coverage is required to be at least $(1-1/δ)\cdotα$, we obtain a $\mathcal{O}(\log δ)$- approximation for sensor placement with $α$-coverage on the plane. In the presence of additional distance or visibility constraints, the framework gives a $\mathcal{O}(\logδ\cdot\log k_{OPT})$-approximation, where $k_{OPT}$ is the size of the optimal solution. We also use our framework to give a $\mathcal{O}(\log δ)$-approximation that ensures $(1-1/δ)\cdot α$-coverage and covers every target within distance $3R$.

preprint2014arXiv

On Computing Maximal Independent Sets of Hypergraphs in Parallel

Whether or not the problem of finding maximal independent sets (MIS) in hypergraphs is in (R)NC is one of the fundamental problems in the theory of parallel computing. Unlike the well-understood case of MIS in graphs, for the hypergraph problem, our knowledge is quite limited despite considerable work. It is known that the problem is in \emph{RNC} when the edges of the hypergraph have constant size. For general hypergraphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, the fastest previously known algorithm works in time $O(\sqrt{n})$ with $\text{poly}(m,n)$ processors. In this paper we give an EREW PRAM algorithm that works in time $n^{o(1)}$ with $\text{poly}(m,n)$ processors on general hypergraphs satisfying $m \leq n^{\frac{\log^{(2)}n}{8(\log^{(3)}n)^2}}$, where $\log^{(2)}n = \log\log n$ and $\log^{(3)}n = \log\log\log n$. Our algorithm is based on a sampling idea that reduces the dimension of the hypergraph and employs the algorithm for constant dimension hypergraphs as a subroutine.