Source author record

Ilya Tolstikhin

Ilya Tolstikhin appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Machine Learning math.PR math.ST Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

When can unlabeled data improve the learning rate?

In semi-supervised classification, one is given access both to labeled and unlabeled data. As unlabeled data is typically cheaper to acquire than labeled data, this setup becomes advantageous as soon as one can exploit the unlabeled data in order to produce a better classifier than with labeled data alone. However, the conditions under which such an improvement is possible are not fully understood yet. Our analysis focuses on improvements in the minimax learning rate in terms of the number of labeled examples (with the number of unlabeled examples being allowed to depend on the number of labeled ones). We argue that for such improvements to be realistic and indisputable, certain specific conditions should be satisfied and previous analyses have failed to meet those conditions. We then demonstrate examples where these conditions can be met, in particular showing rate changes from $1/\sqrt{\ell}$ to $e^{-c\ell}$ and from $1/\sqrt{\ell}$ to $1/\ell$. These results improve our understanding of what is and isn't possible in semi-supervised learning.

preprint2016arXiv

Minimax Lower Bounds for Realizable Transductive Classification

Transductive learning considers a training set of $m$ labeled samples and a test set of $u$ unlabeled samples, with the goal of best labeling that particular test set. Conversely, inductive learning considers a training set of $m$ labeled samples drawn iid from $P(X,Y)$, with the goal of best labeling any future samples drawn iid from $P(X)$. This comparison suggests that transduction is a much easier type of inference than induction, but is this really the case? This paper provides a negative answer to this question, by proving the first known minimax lower bounds for transductive, realizable, binary classification. Our lower bounds show that $m$ should be at least $Ω(d/ε+ \log(1/δ)/ε)$ when $ε$-learning a concept class $\mathcal{H}$ of finite VC-dimension $d<\infty$ with confidence $1-δ$, for all $m \leq u$. This result draws three important conclusions. First, general transduction is as hard as general induction, since both problems have $Ω(d/m)$ minimax values. Second, the use of unlabeled data does not help general transduction, since supervised learning algorithms such as ERM and (Hanneke, 2015) match our transductive lower bounds while ignoring the unlabeled test set. Third, our transductive lower bounds imply lower bounds for semi-supervised learning, which add to the important discussion about the role of unlabeled data in machine learning.

preprint2016arXiv

Permutational Rademacher Complexity: a New Complexity Measure for Transductive Learning

Transductive learning considers situations when a learner observes $m$ labelled training points and $u$ unlabelled test points with the final goal of giving correct answers for the test points. This paper introduces a new complexity measure for transductive learning called Permutational Rademacher Complexity (PRC) and studies its properties. A novel symmetrization inequality is proved, which shows that PRC provides a tighter control over expected suprema of empirical processes compared to what happens in the standard i.i.d. setting. A number of comparison results are also provided, which show the relation between PRC and other popular complexity measures used in statistical learning theory, including Rademacher complexity and Transductive Rademacher Complexity (TRC). We argue that PRC is a more suitable complexity measure for transductive learning. Finally, these results are combined with a standard concentration argument to provide novel data-dependent risk bounds for transductive learning.

preprint2015arXiv

Towards a Learning Theory of Cause-Effect Inference

We pose causal inference as the problem of learning to classify probability distributions. In particular, we assume access to a collection $\{(S_i,l_i)\}_{i=1}^n$, where each $S_i$ is a sample drawn from the probability distribution of $X_i \times Y_i$, and $l_i$ is a binary label indicating whether "$X_i \to Y_i$" or "$X_i \leftarrow Y_i$". Given these data, we build a causal inference rule in two steps. First, we featurize each $S_i$ using the kernel mean embedding associated with some characteristic kernel. Second, we train a binary classifier on such embeddings to distinguish between causal directions. We present generalization bounds showing the statistical consistency and learning rates of the proposed approach, and provide a simple implementation that achieves state-of-the-art cause-effect inference. Furthermore, we extend our ideas to infer causal relationships between more than two variables.

preprint2014arXiv

Localized Complexities for Transductive Learning

We show two novel concentration inequalities for suprema of empirical processes when sampling without replacement, which both take the variance of the functions into account. While these inequalities may potentially have broad applications in learning theory in general, we exemplify their significance by studying the transductive setting of learning theory. For which we provide the first excess risk bounds based on the localized complexity of the hypothesis class, which can yield fast rates of convergence also in the transductive learning setting. We give a preliminary analysis of the localized complexities for the prominent case of kernel classes.