Source author record

Hui-Xiong Deng

Hui-Xiong Deng appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

s-d coupling enhanced phonon anharmonicity in copper-based compounds

Materials with ultralow thermal conductivity are of great interest for efficient energy conversion and thermal barrier coating. Copper-based semiconductors such as copper chalcogenides and copper halides are known to possess extreme low thermal conductivity, whereas the fundamental origin of the low thermal conductivity observed in the copper-based materials remains elusive. Here, we reveal that s-d coupling induced giant phonon anharmonicity is the fundamental mechanism responsible for the ultralow thermal conductivity of copper compounds. The symmetry controlled strong coupling of high-lying occupied copper 3d orbital with the unoccupied 4s state under thermal vibration remarkably lowers the lattice potential barrier, which enhances anharmonic scattering between phonons. This understanding is confirmed by temperature-dependent Raman spectra measurements. Our study offers an insight at atomic level connecting electronic structures with phonon vibration modes, and thus sheds light on materials properties that rely on electron-phonon coupling, such as thermoelectricity and superconductivity.

preprint2019arXiv

A realistic dimension-independent approach for charged defect calculations in semiconductors

First-principles calculations of charged defects have become a cornerstone of research in semiconductors and insulators by providing insights into their fundamental physical properties. But current standard approach using the so-called jellium model has encountered both conceptual ambiguity and computational difficulty, especially for low-dimensional semiconducting materials. In this Communication, we propose a physical, straightforward, and dimension-independent universal model to calculate the formation energies of charged defects in both three-dimensional (3D) bulk and low-dimensional semiconductors. Within this model, the ionized electrons or holes are placed on the realistic host band-edge states instead of the virtual jellium state, therefore, rendering it not only naturally keeps the supercell charge neutral, but also has clear physical meaning. This realistic model reproduces the same accuracy as the traditional jellium model for most of the 3D semiconducting materials, and remarkably, for the low-dimensional structures, it is able to cure the divergence caused by the artificial long-range electrostatic energy introduced in the jellium model, and hence gives meaningful formation energies of defects in charged state and transition energy levels of the corresponding defects. Our realistic method, therefore, will have significant impact for the study of defect physics in all low-dimensional systems including quantum dots, nanowires, surfaces, interfaces, and 2D materials.

preprint2013arXiv

Structural stability of lattice-matched heterovalent semiconductor superlattices

Lattice-matched heterovalent alloys and superlattices have some unique physical properties. For example, their band gap can change by a large amount without significant change in their lattice constants, thus they have great potential for optelectronic applications. Using first-principles total energy calculation and Monte Carlo simulation as well as lattice harmonic expansion, we systematically study the stability of the heterovalent superlattices. We show that the chemical trend of stability of lattice-matched heterovalent superlattices is significantly different from lattice-mismatched isovalent superlattices, because for lattice-mismatched isovalent superlattices the stability is mostly determined by strain, whereas for lattice-matched nonisovalent superlattices the interfacial energy depend not only on the bond energy but also on the Coulomb energy derived from donor- and acceptor-like wrong bonds. In the short-period heterovalent superlattices, the abrupt [111] interface has the lowest energy even though it is polar, whereas for the long-period heterovalent superlattices, the [110] interface has the lowest energy. On the contrary, [201] superlattices are usually the most stable for lattice-mismatched isovalent superlattices.