BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Boris Brimkov

Boris Brimkov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Computer assisted discovery: Zero forcing vs vertex cover

In this paper, we showcase the process of using an automated conjecturing program called \emph{TxGraffiti} written and maintained by the second author. We begin by proving a conjecture formulated by \emph{TxGraffiti} that for a claw-free graph $G$, the vertex cover number $β(G)$ is greater than or equal to the zero forcing number $Z(G)$. Our proof of this result is constructive, and yields a polynomial time algorithm to find a zero forcing set with cardinality $β(G)$. We also use the output of \emph{TxGraffiti} to construct several infinite families of claw-free graphs for which $Z(G)=β(G)$. Additionally, inspired by the aforementioned conjecture of \emph{TxGraffiti}, we also prove a more general relation between the zero forcing number and the vertex cover number for any connected graph with maximum degree $Δ\ge 3$, namely that $Z(G)\leq (Δ-2)β(G)$+1.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Constructions of cospectral graphs with different zero forcing numbers

Several researchers have recently explored various graph parameters that can or cannot be characterized by the spectrum of a matrix associated with a graph. In this paper we show that several NP-hard zero forcing numbers are not characterized by the spectra of several types of associated matrices with a graph. In particular, we consider standard zero forcing, positive semidefinite zero forcing, and skew zero forcing, and provide constructions of infinite families of pairs of cospectral graphs which have different values for these numbers. We explore several methods for obtaining these cospectral graphs including using graph products, graph joins, and graph switching. Among these, we provide a construction involving regular adjacency cospectral graphs; the regularity of this construction also implies cospectrality with respect to several other matrices including the Laplacian, signless Laplacian, and normalized Laplacian. We also provide a construction where pairs of cospectral graphs can have an arbitrarily large difference between their zero forcing numbers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Extending a conjecture of Graham and Lovász on the distance characteristic polynomial

Graham and Lovász conjectured in 1978 that the sequence of normalized coefficients of the distance characteristic polynomial of a tree of order $n$ is unimodal with the maximum value occurring at $\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor$. In this paper we investigate this problem for block graphs. In particular, we prove the unimodality part and we establish the peak for several extremal cases of uniform block graphs with small diameter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Minimal Zero Forcing Sets

In this paper, we study minimal (with respect to inclusion) zero forcing sets. We first investigate when a graph can have polynomially or exponentially many distinct minimal zero forcing sets. We also study the maximum size of a minimal zero forcing set $\overline{\operatorname{Z}}(G)$, and relate it to the zero forcing number $\operatorname{Z}(G)$. Surprisingly, we show that the equality $\overline{\operatorname{Z}}(G)=\operatorname{Z}(G)$ is preserved by deleting a universal vertex, but not by adding a universal vertex. We also characterize graphs with extreme values of $\overline{\operatorname{Z}}(G)$ and explore the gap between $\overline{\operatorname{Z}}(G)$ and $\operatorname{Z}(G)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the status sequences of trees

The status of a vertex $v$ in a connected graph is the sum of the distances from $v$ to all other vertices. The status sequence of a connected graph is the list of the statuses of all the vertices of the graph. In this paper we investigate the status sequences of trees. Particularly, we show that it is NP-complete to decide whether there exists a tree that has a given sequence of integers as its status sequence. We also present some results about trees whose status sequences are comprised of a few distinct numbers or many distinct numbers. In this direction, we provide a partial answer to a conjecture of Shang and Lin from 2011, showing that any status injective tree is unique among trees. Finally, we investigate how orbit partitions and equitable partitions relate to the status sequence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access