Source author record

Henryk Gzyl

Henryk Gzyl appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.OC math.PR math-ph math.MP math.ST Methodology q-fin.PM q-fin.RM quant-ph Statistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works

10topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Classical and quantum harmonic oscillators subject to a time dependent force

In this work we address the problem of the quantization of a simple harmonic oscillator that is perturbed by a time dependent force. The approach consists of removing the perturbation by a canonical change of coordinates. Since the quantization procedure uses the classical Hamiltonian formalism as staring point, the change of variables is carried out using canonical transformations, and to transform between the quantized systems the canonical transformation is implemented as a unitary transformation mapping the states of the perturbed and unperturbed system onto each other.

preprint2022arXiv

Which portfolio is better? A discussion of several possible comparison criteria

During the last few years, there has been an interest in comparing simple or heuristic procedures for portfolio selection, such as the naive, equal weights, portfolio choice, against more "sophisticated" portfolio choices, and in explaining why, in some cases, the heuristic choice seems to outperform the sophisticated choice. We believe that some of these results may be due to the comparison criterion used. It is the purpose of this note to analyze some ways of comparing the performance of portfolios. We begin by analyzing each criterion proposed on the market line, in which there is only one random return. Several possible comparisons between optimal portfolios and the naive portfolio are possible and easy to establish. Afterwards, we study the case in which there is no risk free asset. In this way, we believe some basic theoretical questions regarding why some portfolios may seem to outperform others can be clarified.

preprint2020arXiv

A predictive approach to generalized arithmetic means

The goal of this note is to provide a geometric setting in which generalized arithmetic means are best predictors in an appropriate metric. This characterization provides a geometric interpretation to the concept of certainty equivalent. Besides that, in this geometric setting there also exists the notion of conditional expectation as best predictor given prior information. This leads to a notion of conditional preference and to the notion of conditional certainty equivalent, which turns out to be consistent with the notion of fair pricing.

preprint2020arXiv

From generalized arithmetic means to geodesics to Hamilton dynamics to Bregman divergences

Here we examine some connections between the notions of generalized arithmetic means, geodesics, Lagrange-Hamilton dynamics and Bregman divergences. In a previous paper we developed a predictive interpretation of generalized arithmetic means. That work was more probabilistically oriented. Here we take a geometric turn, and see that generalized arithmetic means actually minimize a geodesic distance on $\mathbb{R}^n.$ Such metrics might result from pull-backs of the Euclidean metric in $\mathbb{R}^n.$ We shall furthermore see that in some cases these pull-backs might coincide with the Hessian of a convex function. This occurs when the Hessian of a convex function has a square root that is the Jacobian of a diffeomorphism in $\mathbb{R}^n.$ In this case we obtain a comparison between the Bregman divergence defined by the convex function and the geodesic distance in the metric defined by its Hessian.

preprint2016arXiv

Superresolution in the maximum entropy approach to invert Laplace transforms

The method of maximum entropy has proven to be a rather powerful way to solve the inverse problem consisting of determining a probability density $f_S(s)$ on $[0,\infty)$ from the knowledge of the expected value of a few generalized moments, that is, of functions $g_i(S)$ of the variable $S.$ A version of this problem, of utmost relevance for banking, insurance, engineering and the physical sciences, corresponds to the case in which $S \geq 0$ and $g_i(s)=\exp(-α_i s),$ th expected values $E[\exp-α_i S)]$ are the values of the Laplace transform of $S$ the points $α_i$ on the real line. Since inverting the Laplace transform is an ill-posed problem, to devise numerical tecniques that are efficient is of importance for many applications, specially in cases where all we know is the value of the transform at a few points along the real axis. A simple change of variables transforms the Laplace inversion problem into a fractional moment problem on $[0,1].$ It is remarkable that the maximum entropy procedure allows us to determine the density on $[0,1]$ with high accuracy. In this note, we examine why this might be so.

preprint2015arXiv

Sample dependence in the maximum entropy solution to the generalized moment problem

The method of maximum entropy is quite a powerful tool to solve the generalized moment problem, which consists of determining the probability density of a random variable X from the knowledge of the expected values of a few functions of the variable. In actual practice, such expected values are determined from empirical samples, leaving open the question of the dependence of the solution upon the sample. It is the purpose of this note to take a few steps towards the analysis of such dependence.

preprint2014arXiv

Two maxentropic approaches to determine the probability density of compound risk losses

Here we present an application of two maxentropic procedures to determine the probability density distribution of compound sums of random variables, using only a finite number of empirically determined fractional moments. The two methods are the Standard method of Maximum Entropy (SME), and the method of Maximum Entropy in the Mean (MEM). We shall verify that the reconstructions obtained satisfy a variety of statistical quality criteria, and provide good estimations of VaR and TVaR, which are important measures for risk management purposes. We analyze the performance and robustness of these two procedures in several numerical examples, in which the frequency of losses is Poisson and the individual losses are lognormal random variables. As side product of the work, we obtain a rather accurate description of the density of the compound random variable. This is an extension of a previous application based on the Standard Maximum Entropy approach (SME) where the analytic form of the Laplace transform was available to a case in which only observed or simulated data is used. These approaches are also used to develop a procedure to determine the distribution of the individual losses through the knowledge of the total loss. Then, in the case of having only historical total losses, it is possible to decompound or disaggregate the random sums in its frequency/severity distributions, through a probabilistic inverse problem.