Source author record

Silvia Mayoral

Silvia Mayoral appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

q-fin.RM Methodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Tail Risk of Electricity Futures

This paper compares the in-sample and out-of-sample performance of several models for computing the tail risk of one-month and one-year electricity futures contracts traded in the NordPool, French, German, and Spanish markets in 2008-2017. As measures of tail risk, we use the one-day-ahead Value-at-Risk (VaR) and the Expected Shortfall (ES). With VaR, the AR (1)-GARCH (1,1) model with Student-t distribution is the best-performing specification with 88% cases in which the Fisher test accepts the model, with a success rate of 94% in the left tail and of 81% in the right tail. The model passes the test of model adequacy in the 100% of the cases in the NordPool and German markets, but only in the 88% and 63% of the cases in the Spanish and French markets. With ES, this model passes the test of model adequacy in 100% of cases in all markets. Historical Simulation and Quantile Regression-based approaches misestimate tail risks. The right-hand tail of the returns is more difficult to model than the left-hand tail and therefore financial regulators and the administrators of futures markets should take these results into account when setting additional regulatory capital requirements and margin account regulations to short positions.

preprint2014arXiv

Two maxentropic approaches to determine the probability density of compound risk losses

Here we present an application of two maxentropic procedures to determine the probability density distribution of compound sums of random variables, using only a finite number of empirically determined fractional moments. The two methods are the Standard method of Maximum Entropy (SME), and the method of Maximum Entropy in the Mean (MEM). We shall verify that the reconstructions obtained satisfy a variety of statistical quality criteria, and provide good estimations of VaR and TVaR, which are important measures for risk management purposes. We analyze the performance and robustness of these two procedures in several numerical examples, in which the frequency of losses is Poisson and the individual losses are lognormal random variables. As side product of the work, we obtain a rather accurate description of the density of the compound random variable. This is an extension of a previous application based on the Standard Maximum Entropy approach (SME) where the analytic form of the Laplace transform was available to a case in which only observed or simulated data is used. These approaches are also used to develop a procedure to determine the distribution of the individual losses through the knowledge of the total loss. Then, in the case of having only historical total losses, it is possible to decompound or disaggregate the random sums in its frequency/severity distributions, through a probabilistic inverse problem.