BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Guenther Walther

Guenther Walther contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologymath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Calibrating the scan statistic with size-dependent critical values: heuristics, methodology and computation

It is known that the scan statistic with variable window size favors the detection of signals with small spatial extent and there is a corresponding loss of power for signals with large spatial extent. Recent results have shown that this loss is not inevitable: Using critical values that depend on the size of the window allows optimal detection for all signal sizes simultaneously, so there is no substantial price to pay for not knowing the correct window size and for scanning with a variable window size. This paper gives a review of the heuristics and methodology for such size-dependent critical values, their applications to various settings including the multivariate case, and recent results about fast algorithms for computing scan statistics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Confidence bands for a log-concave density

We present a new approach for inference about a log-concave distribution: Instead of using the method of maximum likelihood, we propose to incorporate the log-concavity constraint in an appropriate nonparametric confidence set for the cdf $F$. This approach has the advantage that it automatically provides a measure of statistical uncertainty and it thus overcomes a marked limitation of the maximum likelihood estimate. In particular, we show how to construct confidence bands for the density that have a finite sample guaranteed confidence level. The nonparametric confidence set for $F$ which we introduce here has attractive computational and statistical properties: It allows to bring modern tools from optimization to bear on this problem via difference of convex programming, and it results in optimal statistical inference. We show that the width of the resulting confidence bands converges at nearly the parametric $n^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ rate when the log density is $k$-affine.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Large-scale inference with block structure

The detection of weak and rare effects in large amounts of data arises in a number of modern data analysis problems. Known results show that in this situation the potential of statistical inference is severely limited by the large-scale multiple testing that is inherent in these problems. Here we show that fundamentally more powerful statistical inference is possible when there is some structure in the signal that can be exploited, e.g. if the signal is clustered in many small blocks, as is the case in some relevant applications. We derive the detection boundary in such a situation where we allow both the number of blocks and the block length to grow polynomially with sample size. We derive these results both for the univariate and the multivariate settings as well as for the problem of detecting clusters in a network. These results recover as special cases the sparse mixture detection problem (Donoho and Jin, 2004) where there is no structure in the signal, as well as the scan problem (Chan and Walther, 2013) where the signal comprises a single interval. We develop methodology that allows optimal adaptive detection in the general setting, thus exploiting the structure if it is present without incurring a relevant penalty in the case where there is no structure. The advantage of this methodology can be considerable, as in the case of no structure the means need to increase at the rate $\sqrt{\log n}$ to ensure detection, while the presence of structure allows detection even if the means $decrease$ at a polynomial rate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tail bounds for empirically standardized sums

Exponential tail bounds for sums play an important role in statistics, but the example of the $t$-statistic shows that the exponential tail decay may be lost when population parameters need to be estimated from the data. However, it turns out that if Studentizing is accompanied by estimating the location parameter in a suitable way, then the $t$-statistic regains the exponential tail behavior. Motivated by this example, the paper analyzes other ways of empirically standardizing sums and establishes tail bounds that are sub-Gaussian or even closer to normal for the following settings: Standardization with Studentized contrasts for normal observations, standardization with the log likelihood ratio statistic for observations from an exponential family, and standardization via self-normalization for observations from a symmetric distribution with unknown center of symmetry. The latter standardization gives rise to a novel scan statistic for heteroscedastic data whose asymptotic power is analyzed in the case where the observations have a log-concave distribution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

The Essential Histogram

The histogram is widely used as a simple, exploratory display of data, but it is usually not clear how to choose the number and size of bins. We construct a confidence set of distribution functions that optimally address the two main tasks of the histogram: estimating probabilities and detecting features such as increases and modes in the distribution. We define the essential histogram as the histogram in the confidence set with the fewest bins. Thus the essential histogram is the simplest visualization of the data that optimally achieves the main tasks of the histogram. The only assumption we make is that the data are independent and identically distributed. We provide a fast algorithm for the essential histogram, and illustrate our methodology with examples. An R-package is available on CRAN.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access