BZPEER
More

Discover

About BZPEERSearchGraph

Research tools

HomeCollectionsResearchCollaborationPublish

Network

ExpertsCommunities

Opportunities

Listings

Account

Log inCreate account
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Gregory A. Kelsey

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.GRmath.GTmath.DS

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse papers

Published work

4 publications

preprint2020arXiv

On the asymmetry of stars at infinity

Given a bordified space, Karlsson defines an incidence geometry of stars at infinity. These stars and their incidence are closely related to well-understood objects when the space is hyperbolic, CAT(0), or a bounded convex domain with the Hilbert metric. A question stemming from Karlsson's original paper was whether or not the relation of one boundary point being included in a star of another boundary point is symmetric. This paper provides an example demonstrating that this relation in the star boundary of the three-tree Diestel-Leader graph DL3(q)DL_3(q) is not symmetric. In doing so, some interesting bounds on distance in Diestel-Leader graphs are utilized.

Open access
preprint2016arXiv

The horofunction boundary of the lamplighter group L2L_2 with the Diestel-Leader metric

We fully describe the horofunction boundary ∂hL2\partial_h L_2 with the word metric associated with the generating set {t,at}\{t,at\} (i.e the metric arising in the Diestel-Leader graph DL(2,2)\text{DL}(2,2)). The visual boundary ∂∞L2\partial_\infty L_2 with this metric is a subset of ∂hL2\partial_h L_2. Although ∂∞L2\partial_\infty L_2 does not embed continuously in ∂hL2\partial_h L_2, it naturally splits into two subspaces, each of which is a punctured Cantor set and does embed continuously. The height function on DL(2,2)\text{DL}(2,2) provides a natural stratification of ∂hL2\partial_h L_2, in which countably-many non-Busemann points interpolate between the two halves of ∂∞L2\partial_\infty L_2. Furthermore, the height function and its negation are themselves non-Busemann horofunctions in ∂hL2\partial_h L_2 and are global fixed points of the action of L2L_2.

Open access
preprint2015arXiv

Visual boundaries of Diestel-Leader graphs

Diestel-Leader graphs are neither hyperbolic nor CAT(0), so their visual boundaries may be pathological. Indeed, we show that for d>2d>2, ∂DLd(q)\partial\text{DL}_d(q) carries the indiscrete topology. On the other hand, ∂DL2(q)\partial\text{DL}_2(q), while not Hausdorff, is T1T_1, totally disconnected, and compact. Since DL2(q)\text{DL}_2(q) is a Cayley graph of the lamplighter group LqL_q, we also obtain a nice description of ∂DL2(q)\partial\text{DL}_2(q) in terms of the lamp stand model of LqL_q and discuss the dynamics of the action.

Open access
preprint2011arXiv

Mapping schemes realizable by obstructed topological polynomials

In 1985, Levy used a theorem of Berstein to prove that all hyperbolic topological polynomials are equivalent to complex polynomials. We prove a partial converse to the Berstein-Levy Theorem: given post-critical dynamics that are in a sense strongly non-hyperbolic, we prove the existence of topological polynomials which are not equivalent to any complex polynomial that realize these post-critical dynamics. This proof employs the theory of self-similar groups to demonstrate that a topological polynomial admits an obstruction and produces a wealth of examples of obstructed topological polynomials.

Open access

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.