BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Gerhard Lakemeyer

Gerhard Lakemeyer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer ScienceMachine LearningRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Verification of Belief Programs

In a recent paper, Belle and Levesque proposed a framework for a type of program called belief programs, a probabilistic extension of GOLOG programs where every action and sensing result could be noisy and every test condition refers to the agent's subjective beliefs. Inherited from GOLOG programs, the action-centered feature makes belief programs fairly suitable for high-level robot control under uncertainty. An important step before deploying such a program is to verify whether it satisfies properties as desired. At least two problems exist in doing verification: how to formally specify properties of a program and what is the complexity of verification. In this paper, we propose a formalism for belief programs based on a modal logic of actions and beliefs. Among other things, this allows us to express PCTL-like temporal properties smoothly. Besides, we investigate the decidability and undecidability for the verification problem of belief programs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Predictive Object-Centric Process Monitoring

The automation and digitalization of business processes has resulted in large amounts of data captured in information systems, which can aid businesses in understanding their processes better, improve workflows, or provide operational support. By making predictions about ongoing processes, bottlenecks can be identified and resources reallocated, as well as insights gained into the state of a process instance (case). Traditionally, data is extracted from systems in the form of an event log with a single identifying case notion, such as an order id for an Order to Cash (O2C) process. However, real processes often have multiple object types, for example, order, item, and package, so a format that forces the use of a single case notion does not reflect the underlying relations in the data. The Object-Centric Event Log (OCEL) format was introduced to correctly capture this information. The state-of-the-art predictive methods have been tailored to only traditional event logs. This thesis shows that a prediction method utilizing Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures, and Sequence to Sequence models (Seq2seq), can be augmented with the rich data contained in OCEL. Objects in OCEL can have attributes that are useful in predicting the next event and timestamp, such as a priority class attribute for an object type package indicating slower or faster processing. In the metrics of sequence similarity of predicted remaining events and mean absolute error (MAE) of the timestamp, the approach in this thesis matches or exceeds previous research, depending on whether selected object attributes are useful features for the model. Additionally, this thesis provides a web interface to predict the next sequence of activities from user input.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Using Promises for Multi-Agent Cooperation in Goal Reasoning

Reasoning and planning for mobile robots is a challenging problem, as the world evolves over time and thus the robot's goals may change. One technique to tackle this problem is goal reasoning, where the agent not only reasons about its actions, but also about which goals to pursue. While goal reasoning for single agents has been researched extensively, distributed, multi-agent goal reasoning comes with additional challenges, especially in a distributed setting. In such a context, some form of coordination is necessary to allow for cooperative behavior. Previous goal reasoning approaches share the agent's world model with the other agents, which already enables basic cooperation. However, the agent's goals, and thus its intentions, are typically not shared. In this paper, we present a method to tackle this limitation. Extending an existing goal reasoning framework, we propose enabling cooperative behavior between multiple agents through promises, where an agent may promise that certain facts will be true at some point in the future. Sharing these promises allows other agents to not only consider the current state of the world, but also the intentions of other agents when deciding on which goal to pursue next. We describe how promises can be incorporated into the goal life cycle, a commonly used goal refinement mechanism. We then show how promises can be used when planning for a particular goal by connecting them to timed initial literals (TILs) from PDDL planning. Finally, we evaluate our prototypical implementation in a simplified logistics scenario.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Controller Synthesis for Golog Programs over Finite Domains with Metric Temporal Constraints

Executing a Golog program on an actual robot typically requires additional steps to account for hardware or software details of the robot platform, which can be formulated as constraints on the program. Such constraints are often temporal, refer to metric time, and require modifications to the abstract Golog program. We describe how to formulate such constraints based on a modal variant of the Situation Calculus. These constraints connect the abstract program with the platform models, which we describe using timed automata. We show that for programs over finite domains and with fully known initial state, the problem of synthesizing a controller that satisfies the constraints while preserving the effects of the original program can be reduced to MTL synthesis. We do this by constructing a timed automaton from the abstract program and synthesizing an MTL controller from this automaton, the platform models, and the constraints. We prove that the synthesized controller results in execution traces which are the same as those of the original program, possibly interleaved with platform-dependent actions, that they satisfy all constraints, and that they have the same effects as the traces of the original program. By doing so, we obtain a decidable procedure to synthesize a controller that satisfies the specification while preserving the original program.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Multi-Agent Only-Knowing Revisited

Levesque introduced the notion of only-knowing to precisely capture the beliefs of a knowledge base. He also showed how only-knowing can be used to formalize non-monotonic behavior within a monotonic logic. Despite its appeal, all attempts to extend only-knowing to the many agent case have undesirable properties. A belief model by Halpern and Lakemeyer, for instance, appeals to proof-theoretic constructs in the semantics and needs to axiomatize validity as part of the logic. It is also not clear how to generalize their ideas to a first-order case. In this paper, we propose a new account of multi-agent only-knowing which, for the first time, has a natural possible-world semantics for a quantified language with equality. We then provide, for the propositional fragment, a sound and complete axiomatization that faithfully lifts Levesque's proof theory to the many agent case. We also discuss comparisons to the earlier approach by Halpern and Lakemeyer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access