Complexity of inversion of functions on the reals
We study the complexity of deterministic and probabilistic inversions of partial computable functions on the reals.
Researcher profile
George Barmpalias
George Barmpalias contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Trust snapshot
Quick read
Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators
Actions
Decide how to stay connected
Identity and collaboration
How to connect with this researcher
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Open a focused conversation when the fit is right
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
See the researcher in context
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
Building this graph slice
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
9 published item(s)
preprint2022arXiv
Aspects of Muchnik's paradox in restricted betting
Muchnik's paradox says that enumerable betting strategies are not always reducible to enumerable strategies whose bets are restricted to either even rounds or odd rounds. In other words, there are outcome sequences x where an effectively enumerable strategy succeeds, but no such parity-restricted effectively enumerable strategy does. We characterize the effective Hausdorff dimension of such $x$, showing that it can be as low as 1/2 but not less. We also show that such reals that are random with respect to parity-restricted effectively enumerable strategies with packing dimension as low as $\log\sqrt3$. Finally we exhibit Muchnik's paradox in the case of computable integer-valued strategies.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv
Irreducibility of enumerable betting strategies
We study the problem of whether a betting-strategy can be decomposed into an equivalent set of simpler betting-strategies, such as betting-strategies that bet on a restricted set of stages or bet on a restricted of favorable outcomes. We show that the class of effectively enumerable betting-strategies has irreducible members which cannot be decomposed into an equivalent set of simpler betting-strategies. We answer questions of Kastermans and Hitchcock by constructing a real on which no kastergale (which is a left-c.e. supermartingale whose favorable outcomes are effectively determined) succeeds, but some unrestricted left-c.e. supermartingale succeeds on it. We generalize a result of Muchnick by showing that there is a non-1-random real such that no muchgale (which is a left-c.e. supermartingale who does not bet on certain stages) succeeds on it. Our methodology is then used to obtain further irreducibility results, strongly supporting a conjecture that if a natural class of left-c.e. supermartingales defines 1-randomness, then a single member of that class can do so. In another word, the class of left-c.e. supermartingales cannot be reduced to a simpler, natural subclass of it. For example, we show that there is a non-1-random real such that no kastergale or muchgale succeeds on it.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv
Granularity of wagers in games and the possibility of savings
In a casino where arbitrarily small bets are admissible, any betting strategy M can be modified into a savings strategy that, not only is successful on each casino sequence where M is (thus accumulating unbounded wealth inside the casino) but also saves an unbounded capital, by permanently and gradually withdrawing it from the game. Teutsch showed that this is no longer the case when a fixed minimum wager is imposed by the casino, thus exemplifying a savings paradox where a player can win unbounded wealth inside the casino, but upon withdrawing a sufficiently large amount out of the game, he is forced into bankruptcy. We study the potential for saving under a shrinking minimum wager rule (granularity) and its dependence on the rate of decrease (inflation) as well as timid versus bold play.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv
Integer Valued Betting strategies and Turing Degrees
Betting strategies are often expressed formally as martingales. A martingale is called integer-valued if each bet must be an integer value. Integer-valued strategies correspond to the fact that in most betting situations, there is a minimum amount that a player can bet. According to a well known paradigm, algorithmic randomness can be founded on the notion of betting strategies. A real X is called integer-valued random if no effective integer-valued martingale succeeds on X. It turns out that this notion of randomness has interesting interactions with genericity and the computably enumerable degrees. We investigate the computational power of the integer-valued random reals in terms of standard notions from computability theory.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv
Tipping Points in Schelling Segregation
One of the earliest agent-based economical models, Schelling's spacial proximity model illustrated how global segregation can emerge, often unwanted, from the actions of agents of two races acting in accordance with their individual local preferences. Here a 1-dimensional unperturbed variant of the model is studied, which is additionally open in the sense that agents may enter and exit the model. Following the authors' previous work in [1] and that of Brandt, Immorlica, Kamath, and Kleinberg in [2], rigorous results are established, whose statements are asymptotic in both the model and neighbourhood sizes. The current model's openness allows one race or the other to take over almost everywhere in a measure-theoretic sense. Tipping points are identified between the two regions of takeover and the region of staticity, in terms of the parameters of the model. In a significant generalization from previous work, the parameters comprise the initial proportions of the two races, along with independent values of the tolerance for each race.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv
Kolmogorov complexity and computably enumerable sets
We study the computably enumerable sets in terms of the: (a) Kolmogorov complexity of their initial segments; (b) Kolmogorov complexity of finite programs when they are used as oracles. We present an extended discussion of the existing research on this topic, along with recent developments and open problems. Besides this survey, our main original result is the following characterization of the computably enumerable sets with trivial initial segment prefix-free complexity. A computably enumerable set $A$ is $K$-trivial if and only if the family of sets with complexity bounded by the complexity of $A$ is uniformly computable from the halting problem.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv
Universal computably enumerable sets and initial segment prefix-free complexity
We show that there are Turing complete computably enumerable sets of arbitrarily low non-trivial initial segment prefix-free complexity. In particular, given any computably enumerable set $A$ with non-trivial prefix-free initial segment complexity, there exists a Turing complete computably enumerable set $B$ with complexity strictly less than the complexity of $A$. On the other hand it is known that sets with trivial initial segment prefix-free complexity are not Turing complete. Moreover we give a generalization of this result for any finite collection of computably enumerable sets $A_i, i<k$ with non-trivial initial segment prefix-free complexity. An application of this gives a negative answer to a question from \cite[Section 11.12]{rodenisbook} and \cite{MRmerstcdhdtd} which asked for minimal pairs in the structure of the c.e.\ reals ordered by their initial segment prefix-free complexity. Further consequences concern various notions of degrees of randomness. For example, the Solovay degrees and the $K$-degrees of computably enumerable reals and computably enumerable sets are not elementarily equivalent. Also, the degrees of randomness based on plain and prefix-free complexity are not elementarily equivalent; the same holds for their $Δ^0_2$ and $Σ^0_1$ substructures.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv
The typical Turing degree
The Turing degree of a real measures the computational difficulty of producing its binary expansion. Since Turing degrees are tailsets, it follows from Kolmogorov's 0-1 law that for any property which may or may not be satisfied by any given Turing degree, the satisfying class will either be of Lebesgue measure 0 or 1, so long as it is measurable. So either the \emph{typical} degree satisfies the property, or else the typical degree satisfies its negation. Further, there is then some level of randomness sufficient to ensure typicality in this regard. A similar analysis can be made in terms of Baire category, where a standard form of genericity now plays the role that randomness plays in the context of measure. We describe and prove a number of results in a programme of research which aims to establish the properties of the typical Turing degree, where typicality is gauged either in terms of Lebesgue measure or Baire category.
0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access