BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Andrew Lewis-Pye

Andrew Lewis-Pye appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingComputational ComplexityData Structures and AlgorithmsCryptography and SecurityLogic in Computer Sciencemath.LOPopulations and Evolution

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Morpheus Consensus: Excelling on trails and autobahns

Recent research in consensus has often focussed on protocols for State-Machine-Replication (SMR) that can handle high throughputs. Such state-of-the-art protocols (generally DAG-based) induce undue overhead when the needed throughput is low, or else exhibit unnecessarily-poor latency and communication complexity during periods of low throughput. Here we present Morpheus Consensus, which naturally morphs from a quiescent low-throughput leaderless blockchain protocol to a high-throughput leader-based DAG protocol and back, excelling in latency and complexity in both settings. During high-throughout, Morpheus pars with state-of-the-art DAG-based protocols, including Autobahn. During low-throughput, Morpheus exhibits competitive complexity and lower latency than standard protocols such as PBFT and Tendermint, which in turn do not perform well during high-throughput. The key idea of Morpheus is that as long as blocks do not conflict (due to Byzantine behaviour, network delays, or high-throughput simultaneous production) it produces a forkless blockchain, promptly finalizing each block upon arrival. It assigns a leader only if one is needed to resolve conflicts, in a manner and with performance not unlike Autobahn.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Quadratic worst-case message complexity for State Machine Replication in the partial synchrony model

We consider the message complexity of State Machine Replication protocols dealing with Byzantine failures in the partial synchrony model. A result of Dolev and Reischuk gives a quadratic lower bound for the message complexity, but it was unknown whether this lower bound is tight, with the most efficient known protocols giving worst-case message complexity $O(n^3)$. We describe a protocol which meets Dolev and Reischuk's quadratic lower bound, while also satisfying other desirable properties. To specify these properties, suppose that we have $n$ replicas, $f$ of which display Byzantine faults (with $n\geq 3f+1$). Suppose that $Δ$ is an upper bound on message delay, i.e. if a message is sent at time $t$, then it is received by time $ \text{max} \{ t, GST \} +Δ$. We describe a deterministic protocol that simultaneously achieves $O(n^2)$ worst-case message complexity, optimistic responsiveness, $O(fΔ)$ time to first confirmation after $GST$ and $O(n)$ mean message complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A General Framework for the Security Analysis of Blockchain Protocols

Blockchain protocols differ in fundamental ways, including the mechanics of selecting users to produce blocks (e.g., proof-of-work vs. proof-of-stake) and the method to establish consensus (e.g., longest chain rules vs. Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) inspired protocols). These fundamental differences have hindered "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of blockchain protocols and, in turn, the development of theory to formally discuss their relative merits. This paper presents a parsimonious abstraction sufficient for capturing and comparing properties of many well-known permissionless blockchain protocols, simultaneously capturing essential properties of both proof-of-work (PoW) and proof-of-stake (PoS) protocols, and of both longest-chain-type and BFT-type protocols. Our framework blackboxes the precise mechanics of the user selection process, allowing us to isolate the properties of the selection process that are significant for protocol design. We demonstrate the utility of our general framework with several concrete results: 1. We prove a CAP-type impossibility theorem asserting that liveness with an unknown level of participation rules out security in a partially synchronous setting. 2. Delving deeper into the partially synchronous setting, we prove that a necessary and sufficient condition for security is the production of "certificates," meaning stand-alone proofs of block confirmation. 3. Restricting to synchronous settings, we prove that typical protocols with a known level of participation (including longest chain-type PoS protocols) can be adapted to provide certificates, but those with an unknown level of participation cannot. 4. Finally, we use our framework to articulate a modular two-step approach to blockchain security analysis that effectively reduces the permissionless case to the permissioned case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Resource Pools and the CAP Theorem

Blockchain protocols differ in fundamental ways, including the mechanics of selecting users to produce blocks (e.g., proof-of-work vs. proof-of-stake) and the method to establish consensus (e.g., longest chain rules vs. BFT-inspired protocols). These fundamental differences have hindered "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of blockchain protocols and, in turn, the development of theory to formally discuss their relative merits. This paper presents a parsimonious abstraction sufficient for capturing and comparing properties of many well-known permissionless blockchain protocols, simultaneously capturing essential properties of both proof-of-work and proof-of-stake protocols, and of both longest-chain-type and BFT-type protocols. Our framework blackboxes the precise mechanics of the user selection process, allowing us to isolate the properties of the selection process which are significant for protocol design. We illustrate our framework's utility with two results. First, we prove an analog of the CAP theorem from distributed computing for our framework in a partially synchronous setting. This theorem shows that a fundamental dichotomy holds between protocols (such as Bitcoin) that are adaptive, in the sense that they can function given unpredictable levels of participation, and protocols (such as Algorand) that have certain finality properties. Second, we formalize the idea that proof-of-work (PoW) protocols and non-PoW protocols can be distinguished by the forms of permission that users are given to carry out updates to the state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Computing halting probabilities from other halting probabilities

The halting probability of a Turing machine is the probability that the machine will halt if it starts with a random stream written on its one-way input tape. When the machine is universal, this probability is referred to as Chaitin's omega number, and is the most well known example of a real which is random in the sense of Martin-Löf. Although omega numbers depend on the underlying universal Turing machine, they are robust in the sense that they all have the same Turing degree, namely the degree of the halting problem. In this paper we give precise bounds on the redundancy growth rate that is generally required for the computation of an omega number from another omega number. We show that for each $ε>1$, any pair of omega numbers compute each other with redundancy $ε\log n$. On the other hand, this is not true for $ε=1$. In fact, we show that for each omega number there exists another omega number which is not computable from the first one with redundancy $\log n$. This latter result improves an older result of Frank Stephan.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Optimal asymptotic bounds on the oracle use in computations from Chaitin's Omega

Chaitin's number Omega is the halting probability of a universal prefix-free machine, and although it depends on the underlying enumeration of prefix-free machines, it is always Turing-complete. It can be observed, in fact, that for every computably enumerable (c.e.) real, there exists a Turing functional via which Omega computes it, and such that the number of bits of omega that are needed for the computation of the first n bits of the given number (i.e. the use on argument n) is bounded above by a computable function h(n) = n+o(n). We characterise the asymptotic upper bounds on the use of Chaitin's omega in oracle computations of halting probabilities (i.e. c.e. reals). We show that the following two conditions are equivalent for any computable function h such that h(n)-n is non-decreasing: (1) h(n)-n is an information content measure, (2) for every c.e. real there exists a Turing functional via which omega computes the real with use bounded by h. We also give a similar characterisation with respect to computations of c.e. sets from Omega, by showing that the following are equivalent for any computable non-decreasing function g: (1) g is an information-content measure, (2) for every c.e. set A, Omega computes A with use bounded by g. Further results and some connections with Solovay functions are given.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A mathematical analysis of the evolutionary benefits of sexual reproduction

The question as to why most higher organisms reproduce sexually has remained open despite extensive research, and has been called "the queen of problems in evolutionary biology". Theories dating back to Weismann have suggested that the key must lie in the creation of increased variability in offspring, causing enhanced response to selection. Rigorously quantifying the effects of assorted mechanisms which might lead to such increased variability, and establishing that these beneficial effects outweigh the immediate costs of sexual reproduction has, however, proved problematic. Here we introduce an approach which does not focus on particular mechanisms influencing factors such as the fixation of beneficial mutants or the ability of populations to deal with deleterious mutations, but rather tracks the entire distribution of a population of genotypes as it moves across vast fitness landscapes. In this setting simulations now show sex robustly outperforming asex across a broad spectrum of finite or infinite population models. Concentrating on the additive infinite populations model, we are able to give a rigorous mathematical proof establishing that sexual reproduction acts as a more efficient optimiser of mean fitness, thereby solving the problem for this model. Some of the key features of this analysis carry through to the finite populations case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access