BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Gavin Brown

Gavin Brown contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine Learningmath.AGArtificial IntelligenceComputer Science and Game TheoryComputer VisionInformation Theorymath.IT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Self-Improvement for Fast, High-Quality Plan Generation

Generative models trained on synthetic plan data are a promising approach to generalized planning. Recent work has focused on finding any valid plan, rather than a high-quality solution. We address the challenge of producing high-quality plans, a computationally hard problem, in sub-exponential time. First, we demonstrate that, given optimal data, a decoder-only transformer can generate high-quality plans for unseen problem instances. Second, we show how to self-improve an initial model trained on sub-optimal data. Each round of self-improvement combines multiple model calls with graph search to generate improved plans, used for model fine-tuning. An experimental study on four domains: Blocksworld, Logistics, Labyrinth, and Sokoban, shows on average a 30% reduction in plan length over the source symbolic planner, with over 80% of plans being optimal, where the optimum is known. Plan quality is further improved by inference-time search. The model's latency scales sub-exponentially in contrast to the satisficing and optimal symbolic planners to which we compare. Together, these results suggest that self-improvement with generative models offers a scalable approach for high-quality plan generation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Bias-Variance Decompositions for Margin Losses

We introduce a novel bias-variance decomposition for a range of strictly convex margin losses, including the logistic loss (minimized by the classic LogitBoost algorithm), as well as the squared margin loss and canonical boosting loss. Furthermore, we show that, for all strictly convex margin losses, the expected risk decomposes into the risk of a "central" model and a term quantifying variation in the functional margin with respect to variations in the training data. These decompositions provide a diagnostic tool for practitioners to understand model overfitting/underfitting, and have implications for additive ensemble models -- for example, when our bias-variance decomposition holds, there is a corresponding "ambiguity" decomposition, which can be used to quantify model diversity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Kawamata boundedness for Fano threefolds and the Graded Ring Database

We explain an effective Kawamata boundedness result for Mori-Fano 3-folds. In particular, we describe a list of 39,550 possible Hilbert series of semistable Mori-Fano 3-folds, with examples to explain its meaning, its relationship to known classifications and the wealth of more general Fano 3-folds it contains, as well as its application to the on-going classification of Fano 3-folds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Performative Prediction in a Stateful World

Deployed supervised machine learning models make predictions that interact with and influence the world. This phenomenon is called performative prediction by Perdomo et al. (ICML 2020). It is an ongoing challenge to understand the influence of such predictions as well as design tools so as to control that influence. We propose a theoretical framework where the response of a target population to the deployed classifier is modeled as a function of the classifier and the current state (distribution) of the population. We show necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence to an equilibrium of two retraining algorithms, repeated risk minimization and a lazier variant. Furthermore, convergence is near an optimal classifier. We thus generalize results of Perdomo et al., whose performativity framework does not assume any dependence on the state of the target population. A particular phenomenon captured by our model is that of distinct groups that acquire information and resources at different rates to be able to respond to the latest deployed classifier. We study this phenomenon theoretically and empirically.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Strong Memory Lower Bounds for Learning Natural Models

We give lower bounds on the amount of memory required by one-pass streaming algorithms for solving several natural learning problems. In a setting where examples lie in $\{0,1\}^d$ and the optimal classifier can be encoded using $κ$ bits, we show that algorithms which learn using a near-minimal number of examples, $\tilde O(κ)$, must use $\tilde Ω( dκ)$ bits of space. Our space bounds match the dimension of the ambient space of the problem's natural parametrization, even when it is quadratic in the size of examples and the final classifier. For instance, in the setting of $d$-sparse linear classifiers over degree-2 polynomial features, for which $κ=Θ(d\log d)$, our space lower bound is $\tildeΩ(d^2)$. Our bounds degrade gracefully with the stream length $N$, generally having the form $\tildeΩ\left(dκ\cdot \fracκ{N}\right)$. Bounds of the form $Ω(dκ)$ were known for learning parity and other problems defined over finite fields. Bounds that apply in a narrow range of sample sizes are also known for linear regression. Ours are the first such bounds for problems of the type commonly seen in recent learning applications that apply for a large range of input sizes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Better Boosting with Bandits for Online Learning

Probability estimates generated by boosting ensembles are poorly calibrated because of the margin maximization nature of the algorithm. The outputs of the ensemble need to be properly calibrated before they can be used as probability estimates. In this work, we demonstrate that online boosting is also prone to producing distorted probability estimates. In batch learning, calibration is achieved by reserving part of the training data for training the calibrator function. In the online setting, a decision needs to be made on each round: shall the new example(s) be used to update the parameters of the ensemble or those of the calibrator. We proceed to resolve this decision with the aid of bandit optimization algorithms. We demonstrate superior performance to uncalibrated and naively-calibrated on-line boosting ensembles in terms of probability estimation. Our proposed mechanism can be easily adapted to other tasks(e.g. cost-sensitive classification) and is robust to the choice of hyperparameters of both the calibrator and the ensemble.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Margin Maximization as Lossless Maximal Compression

The ultimate goal of a supervised learning algorithm is to produce models constructed on the training data that can generalize well to new examples. In classification, functional margin maximization -- correctly classifying as many training examples as possible with maximal confidence --has been known to construct models with good generalization guarantees. This work gives an information-theoretic interpretation of a margin maximizing model on a noiseless training dataset as one that achieves lossless maximal compression of said dataset -- i.e. extracts from the features all the useful information for predicting the label and no more. The connection offers new insights on generalization in supervised machine learning, showing margin maximization as a special case (that of classification) of a more general principle and explains the success and potential limitations of popular learning algorithms like gradient boosting. We support our observations with theoretical arguments and empirical evidence and identify interesting directions for future work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

To Ensemble or Not Ensemble: When does End-To-End Training Fail?

End-to-End training (E2E) is becoming more and more popular to train complex Deep Network architectures. An interesting question is whether this trend will continue-are there any clear failure cases for E2E training? We study this question in depth, for the specific case of E2E training an ensemble of networks. Our strategy is to blend the gradient smoothly in between two extremes: from independent training of the networks, up to to full E2E training. We find clear failure cases, where over-parameterized models cannot be trained E2E. A surprising result is that the optimum can sometimes lie in between the two, neither an ensemble or an E2E system. The work also uncovers links to Dropout, and raises questions around the nature of ensemble diversity and multi-branch networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access