Source author record

Friedrich Hegenbarth

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.AT math.GT math.DG

Catalog footprint

Research overview

9works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2023arXiv

Limits of manifolds in the Gromov-Hausdorff metric space

We apply the Gromov-Hausdorff metric $d_G$ for characterization of certain generalized manifolds. Previously, we have proved that with respect to the metric $d_G,$ generalized $n$ -manifolds are limits of spaces which are obtained by gluing two topological $n$ -manifolds by a controlled homotopy equivalence (the so-called $2$ -patch spaces). In the present paper, we consider the so-called {\sl manifold-like} generalized $n$ -manifolds $X^{n},$ introduced in 1966 by Mardešić and Segal, which are characterized by the existence of $δ$ -mappings $f_δ$ of $X^n$ onto closed manifolds $M^{n}_δ,$ for arbitrary small $δ>0$ , i.e. there exist onto maps $f_δ\colon X^{n}\to M^{n}_δ$ such that for every $u\in M^{n}_δ$ , $f^{-1}_δ(u)$ has diameter less than $δ$ . We prove that with respect to the metric $d_G,$ manifold-like generalized $n$ -manifolds $X^{n}$ are limits of topological $n$ -manifolds $M^{n}_{i}$ . Moreover, if topological $n$ -manifolds $M^{n}_{i}$ satisfy a certain local contractibility condition $\mathcal{M}(\varrho, n)$ , we prove that generalized $n$ -manifold $X^{n}$ is resolvable.

preprint2022arXiv

Generalized manifolds, normal invariants, and $\mathbb{L}$ -homology

Let $X^{n}$ be an arbitrary oriented closed generalized $n$ -manifold, $n\ge 5$ . In our recent paper (Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) 63 (2020), no. 2, 597-607) we have constructed a map $t:\mathcal{N}(X^{n}) \to H^{st}_{n} ( X^{n}; \mathbb{L}^+)$ which extends the normal invariant map for the case when $X^{n}$ is a topological $n$ -manifold. Here, $\mathcal{N}(X^{n})$ denotes the set of all normal bordism classes of degree one normal maps $(f,b): M^{n} \to X^{n},$ and $H^{st}_{*} ( X^{n}; \mathbb{E})$ denotes the Steenrod homology of the spectrum $\mathbb{E}$ . An important nontrivial question arose whether the map $t$ is bijective (note that this holds in the case that $X^{n}$ is a topological $n$ -manifold). It is the purpose of this paper to prove that the answer to this question is affirmative.

preprint2020arXiv

Controlled homotopy equivalences and structure sets of manifolds

For a closed topological $n$ --manifold $K$ and a map $p:K\to B$ inducing an isomorphism $π_1(K)\toπ_1(B)$ , there is a canonicaly defined morphism $b:H_{n+1}(B,K,\mathbb{L})\to \mathbb{S} (K)$ , where $\mathbb{L}$ is the periodic simply-connected surgery spectrum and $\mathbb{S} (K)$ is the topological structure set. We construct a refinement $a:H_{n+1}^{+}(B,K,\mathbb{L} )\to \mathbb{S}_{\varepsilon ,δ}(K)$ in the case when $p$ is $UV^1$ , and we show that $a$ is bijective if $B$ is a finite-dimensional compact metric ANR. Here, $H_{n+1}^{+}(B,K,\mathbb{L} )\subset H_{n+1}(B,K,\mathbb{L} )$ , and $\mathbb{S}_{\varepsilon ,δ}(K)$ is the controlled structure set. We show that the Pedersen-Quinn-Ranicki controlled surgery sequence is equivalent to the exact $\mathbb{L}$ -homology sequence of the map $p:K \to B$ , i.e. that $H_{n+1}(B,\mathbb{L})\to H_{n+1}^{+}(B,K,\mathbb{L} )\to H_n(K,\mathbb{L}^{+})\to H_n(B,\mathbb{L} ), \ \mathbb{L}^{+}\to \mathbb{L},$ is the connected covering spectrum of $\mathbb{L}$ . By taking for $B$ various stages of the Postnikov tower of $K$ , one obtains an interesting filtration of the controlled structure set.

preprint2020arXiv

Controlled surgery and $\mathbb{L}$ -homology

This paper presents an alternative approach to controlled surgery obstructions. The obstruction for a degree one normal map $(f,b): M^n \rightarrow X^n$ with control map $q: X^n \rightarrow B$ to complete controlled surgery is an element $σ^c (f, b) \in H_n (B, \mathbb{L})$ , where $M^n, X^n$ are topological manifolds of dimension $n \geq 5$ . Our proof uses essentially the geometrically defined $\mathbb{L}$ -spectrum as described by Nicas (going back to Quinn) and some well known homotopy theory. We also outline the construction of the algebraically defined obstruction, and we explicitly describe the assembly map $H_n (B, \mathbb{L}) \rightarrow L_n (π_1 (B))$ in terms of forms in the case $n \equiv 0 (4)$ . Finally, we explicitly determine the canonical map $H_n (B, \mathbb{L}) \rightarrow H_n (B, L_0)$ .

preprint2020arXiv

On Steenrod $\mathbb{L}$ -homology, generalized manifolds, and surgery

The aim of this paper is to show the importance of the Steenrod construction of homology theories for the disassembly process in surgery on a generalized $n$ -manifold $X^n$ , in order to produce an element of generalized homology theory, which is basic for calculations. In particular, we show how to construct an element of the $n$ -th Steenrod homology group $H^{st}_{n} (X^{n}, \mathbb{L}^+),$ where $\mathbb{L}^+$ is the connected covering spectrum of the periodic surgery spectrum $\mathbb{L}$ , avoiding the use of the geometric splitting procedure, which is standardly used in surgery on topological manifolds.

preprint2015arXiv

Homotopy classification of $PD_4$ -complexes relative an order relation

We define an order relation among oriented $PD_4$ -complexes. We show that with respect to this relation, two $PD_4$ -complexes over the same complex are homotopy equivalent if and only if there is an isometry between the second homology groups. We also consider minimal objects of this relation.

preprint2014arXiv

On minimal Poincaré $4$ -complexes

We consider two types of minimal Poincaré $4$ -complexes. One is defined with respect to the degree $1$ -map order. This idea was already present in our previous papers, and more systematically studied later by Hillman. The second type of minimal Poincaré $4$ -complexes were introduced by Hambleton, Kreck and Teichner. It is not based on an order relation. In the present paper we study existence and uniqueness.

preprint2013arXiv

Browder-Livesay filtrations and the example of Cappell and Shaneson

Let $M^3$ be a 3-dimensional manifold with fundamental group $π_1(M)$ which contains a quaternion subgroup $Q$ of order 8. In 1979 Cappell and Shaneson constructed a nontrivial normal map $f\colon M^3\times T^2\to M^3\times S^2$ which cannot be detected by simply connected surgery obstructions along submanifolds of codimension 0, 1, or 2, but it can be detected by the codimension 3 Kervaire-Arf invariant. The proof of non-triviality of $σ(f)\in L_5(π_1(M))$ is based on consideration of a Browder-Livesay filtration of a manifold $X$ with $π_1(X)\cong π_1(M)$ . For a Browder-Livesay pair $Y^{n-1}\subset X^n$ , the restriction of a normal map to the submanifold $Y$ is given by a partial multivalued map $Γ\colon L_n(π_1(X))\to L_{n-1}(π_1(Y))$ , and the Browder-Livesay filtration provides an iteration $Γ^n$ . This map is a basic step in the definition of the iterated Browder-Livesay invariants which give obstructions to realization of surgery obstructions by normal maps of closed manifolds. In the present paper we prove that $Γ^3(σ(f))=0$ for any Browder-Livesay filtration of a manifold $X^{4k+1}$ with $π_1(X)\cong Q$ . We compute splitting obstruction groups for various inclusions $ρ\to Q$ of index 2, describe natural maps in the braids of exact sequences, and make more precise several results about surgery obstruction groups of the group $Q$ .

preprint2011arXiv

The Bryant-Ferry-Mio-Weinberger construction of generalized manifolds

Following Bryant, Ferry, Mio and Weinberger we construct generalized manifolds as limits of controlled sequences p_i: X_i --> X_{i-1} : i = 1,2,... of controlled Poincaré spaces. The basic ingredient is the epsilon-delta-surgery sequence recently proved by Pedersen, Quinn and Ranicki. Since one has to apply it not only in cases when the target is a manifold, but a controlled Poincaré complex, we explain this issue very roughly. Specifically, it is applied in the inductive step to construct the desired controlled homotopy equivalence p_{i+1}: X_{i+1} --> X_i. Our main theorem requires a sufficiently controlled Poincaré structure on X_i (over X_{i-1}). Our construction shows that this can be achieved. In fact, the Poincaré structure of X_i depends upon a homotopy equivalence used to glue two manifold pieces together (the rest is surgery theory leaving unaltered the Poincaré structure). It follows from the epsilon-delta-surgery sequence (more precisely from the Wall realization part) that this homotopy equivalence is sufficiently well controlled. In the final section we give additional explanation why the limit space of the X_i's has no resolution.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Friedrich Hegenbarth

Research overview

Is this your work?

9 publications

Limits of manifolds in the Gromov-Hausdorff metric space

Generalized manifolds, normal invariants, and $\mathbb{L}$ -homology

Controlled homotopy equivalences and structure sets of manifolds

Controlled surgery and $\mathbb{L}$ -homology

On Steenrod $\mathbb{L}$ -homology, generalized manifolds, and surgery

Homotopy classification of $PD_4$ -complexes relative an order relation

On minimal Poincaré $4$ -complexes

Browder-Livesay filtrations and the example of Cappell and Shaneson

The Bryant-Ferry-Mio-Weinberger construction of generalized manifolds

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Friedrich Hegenbarth

Research overview

Is this your work?

9 publications

Limits of manifolds in the Gromov-Hausdorff metric space

Generalized manifolds, normal invariants, and L\mathbb{L}L-homology

Controlled homotopy equivalences and structure sets of manifolds

Controlled surgery and L\mathbb{L}L-homology

On Steenrod L\mathbb{L}L-homology, generalized manifolds, and surgery

Homotopy classification of PD4PD_4PD4​-complexes relative an order relation

On minimal Poincaré 444-complexes

Browder-Livesay filtrations and the example of Cappell and Shaneson

The Bryant-Ferry-Mio-Weinberger construction of generalized manifolds

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Generalized manifolds, normal invariants, and $\mathbb{L}$ -homology

Controlled surgery and $\mathbb{L}$ -homology

On Steenrod $\mathbb{L}$ -homology, generalized manifolds, and surgery

Homotopy classification of $PD_4$ -complexes relative an order relation

On minimal Poincaré $4$ -complexes