Researcher profile

Francesca Greselin

Francesca Greselin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Robust variable selection in the framework of classification with label noise and outliers: applications to spectroscopic data in agri-food

Classification of high-dimensional spectroscopic data is a common task in analytical chemistry. Well-established procedures like support vector machines (SVMs) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) are the most common methods for tackling this supervised learning problem. Nonetheless, interpretation of these models remains sometimes difficult, and solutions based on feature selection are often adopted as they lead to the automatic identification of the most informative wavelengths. Unfortunately, for some delicate applications like food authenticity, mislabeled and adulterated spectra occur both in the calibration and/or validation sets, with dramatic effects on the model development, its prediction accuracy and robustness. Motivated by these issues, the present paper proposes a robust model-based method that simultaneously performs variable selection, outliers and label noise detection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal in dealing with three agri-food spectroscopic studies, where several forms of perturbations are considered. Our approach succeeds in diminishing problem complexity, identifying anomalous spectra and attaining competitive predictive accuracy considering a very low number of selected wavelengths.

preprint2020arXiv

Anomaly and Novelty detection for robust semi-supervised learning

Three important issues are often encountered in Supervised and Semi-Supervised Classification: class-memberships are unreliable for some training units (label noise), a proportion of observations might depart from the main structure of the data (outliers) and new groups in the test set may have not been encountered earlier in the learning phase (unobserved classes). The present work introduces a robust and adaptive Discriminant Analysis rule, capable of handling situations in which one or more of the afore-mentioned problems occur. Two EM-based classifiers are proposed: the first one that jointly exploits the training and test sets (transductive approach), and the second one that expands the parameter estimate using the test set, to complete the group structure learned from the training set (inductive approach). Experiments on synthetic and real data, artificially adulterated, are provided to underline the benefits of the proposed method.

preprint2020arXiv

The Social Welfare Implications of the Zenga Index

We introduce the social welfare implications of the Zenga index, a recently proposed index of inequality. Our proposal is derived by following the seminal book by Son (2011) and the recent working paper by Kakwani and Son (2019). We compare the Zenga based approach with the classical one, based on the Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient, as well as the Bonferroni index. We show that the social welfare specification based on the Zenga uniformity curve presents some peculiarities that distinguish it from the other considered indexes. The social welfare specification presented here provides a deeper understanding of how the Zenga index evaluates the inequality in a distribution.