BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Francesc Rossello

Francesc Rossello contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Populations and EvolutionDiscrete Mathematicsmath.PRQuantitative MethodsOther Quantitative BiologyComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceData Structures and Algorithmsmath.GR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Cophenetic metrics for phylogenetic trees, after Sokal and Rohlf

Phylogenetic tree comparison metrics are an important tool in the study of evolution, and hence the definition of such metrics is an interesting problem in phylogenetics. In a paper in Taxon fifty years ago, Sokal and Rohlf proposed to measure quantitatively the difference between a pair of phylogenetic trees by first encoding them by means of their half-matrices of cophenetic values, and then comparing these matrices. This idea has been used several times since then to define dissimilarity measures between phylogenetic trees but, to our knowledge, no proper metric on weighted phylogenetic trees with nested taxa based on this idea has been formally defined and studied yet. Actually, the cophenetic values of pairs of different taxa alone are not enough to single out phylogenetic trees with weighted arcs or nested taxa. In this paper we define a family of cophenetic metrics that compare phylogenetic trees on a same set of taxa by encoding them by means of their vectors of cophenetic values of pairs of taxa and depths of single taxa, and then computing the $L^p$ norm of the difference of the corresponding vectors. Then, we study, either analytically or numerically, some of their basic properties: neighbors, diameter, distribution, and their rank correlation with each other and with other metrics.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The expected value of the squared euclidean cophenetic metric under the Yule and the uniform models

The cophenetic metrics $d_{φ,p}$, for $p\in {0}\cup[1,\infty[$, are a recent addition to the kit of available distances for the comparison of phylogenetic trees. Based on a fifty years old idea of Sokal and Rohlf, these metrics compare phylogenetic trees on a same set of taxa by encoding them by means of their vectors of cophenetic values of pairs of taxa and depths of single taxa, and then computing the $L^p$ norm of the difference of the corresponding vectors. In this paper we compute the expected value of the square of $d_{φ,2}$ on the space of fully resolved rooted phylogenetic trees with $n$ leaves, under the Yule and the uniform probability distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A new balance index for phylogenetic trees

Several indices that measure the degree of balance of a rooted phylogenetic tree have been proposed so far in the literature. In this work we define and study a new index of this kind, which we call the total cophenetic index: the sum, over all pairs of different leaves, of the depth of their least common ancestor. This index makes sense for arbitrary trees, can be computed in linear time and it has a larger range of values and a greater resolution power than other indices like Colless' or Sackin's. We compute its maximum and minimum values for arbitrary and binary trees, as well as exact formulas for its expected value for binary trees under the Yule and the uniform models of evolution. As a byproduct of this study, we obtain an exact formula for the expected value of the Sackin index under the uniform model, a result that seems to be new in the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Exact formulas for the variance of several balance indices under the Yule model

One of the main applications of balance indices is in tests of null models of evolutionary processes. The knowledge of an exact formula for a statistic of a balance index, holding for any number n of leaves, is necessary in order to use this statistic in tests of this kind involving trees of any size. In this paper we obtain exact formulas for the variance under the Yule model of the Sackin index, the Colless index and the total cophenetic index of binary rooted phylogenetic trees with n leaves. We also obtain the covariance of the Sackin and the total cophenetic index.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Ternary graph isomorphism in polynomial time, after Luks

The graph isomorphism problem has a long history in mathematics and computer science, with applications in computational chemistry and biology, and it is believed to be neither solvable in polynomial time nor NP-complete. E. Luks proposed in 1982 the best algorithm so far for the solution of this problem, which moreover runs in polynomial time if an upper bound for the degrees of the nodes in the graphs is taken as a constant. Unfortunately, Luks' algorithm is purely theoretical, very difficult to use in practice, and, in particular, we have not been able to find any implementation of it in the literature. The main goal of this paper is to present an efficient implementation of this algorithm for ternary graphs in the SAGE system, as well as an adaptation to fully resolved rooted phylogenetic networks on a given set of taxa.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The expected value under the Yule model of the squared path-difference distance

The path-difference metric is one of the oldest and most popular distances for the comparison of phylogenetic trees, but its statistical properties are still quite unknown. In this paper we compute the expected value under the Yule model of evolution of its square on the space of fully resolved rooted phylogenetic trees with n leaves. This complements previous work by Steel-Penny and Mir-Rosselló, who computed this mean value for fully resolved unrooted and rooted phylogenetic trees, respectively, under the uniform distribution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A metric for galled networks

Galled networks, directed acyclic graphs that model evolutionary histories with reticulation cycles containing only tree nodes, have become very popular due to both their biological significance and the existence of polynomial time algorithms for their reconstruction. In this paper we prove that Nakhleh's $m$ measure is a metric for this class of phylogenetic networks and hence it can be safely used to evaluate galled network reconstruction methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

The transposition distance for phylogenetic trees

The search for similarity and dissimilarity measures on phylogenetic trees has been motivated by the computation of consensus trees, the search by similarity in phylogenetic databases, and the assessment of clustering results in bioinformatics. The transposition distance for fully resolved phylogenetic trees is a recent addition to the extensive collection of available metrics for comparing phylogenetic trees. In this paper, we generalize the transposition distance from fully resolved to arbitrary phylogenetic trees, through a construction that involves an embedding of the set of phylogenetic trees with a fixed number of labeled leaves into a symmetric group and a generalization of Reidys-Stadler's involution metric for RNA contact structures. We also present simple linear-time algorithms for computing it.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2005arXiv

On the Ancestral Compatibility of Two Phylogenetic Trees with Nested Taxa

Compatibility of phylogenetic trees is the most important concept underlying widely-used methods for assessing the agreement of different phylogenetic trees with overlapping taxa and combining them into common supertrees to reveal the tree of life. The notion of ancestral compatibility of phylogenetic trees with nested taxa was introduced by Semple et al in 2004. In this paper we analyze in detail the meaning of this compatibility from the points of view of the local structure of the trees, of the existence of embeddings into a common supertree, and of the joint properties of their cluster representations. Our analysis leads to a very simple polynomial-time algorithm for testing this compatibility, which we have implemented and is freely available for download from the BioPerl collection of Perl modules for computational biology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access