BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Florian Faion

Florian Faion contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Improved Orientation Estimation and Detection with Hybrid Object Detection Networks for Automotive Radar

This paper presents novel hybrid architectures that combine grid- and point-based processing to improve the detection performance and orientation estimation of radar-based object detection networks. Purely grid-based detection models operate on a bird's-eye-view (BEV) projection of the input point cloud. These approaches suffer from a loss of detailed information through the discrete grid resolution. This applies in particular to radar object detection, where relatively coarse grid resolutions are commonly used to account for the sparsity of radar point clouds. In contrast, point-based models are not affected by this problem as they process point clouds without discretization. However, they generally exhibit worse detection performances than grid-based methods. We show that a point-based model can extract neighborhood features, leveraging the exact relative positions of points, before grid rendering. This has significant benefits for a subsequent grid-based convolutional detection backbone. In experiments on the public nuScenes dataset our hybrid architecture achieves improvements in terms of detection performance (19.7% higher mAP for car class than next-best radar-only submission) and orientation estimates (11.5% relative orientation improvement) over networks from previous literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Self-Supervised Velocity Estimation for Automotive Radar Object Detection Networks

This paper presents a method to learn the Cartesian velocity of objects using an object detection network on automotive radar data. The proposed method is self-supervised in terms of generating its own training signal for the velocities. Labels are only required for single-frame, oriented bounding boxes (OBBs). Labels for the Cartesian velocities or contiguous sequences, which are expensive to obtain, are not required. The general idea is to pre-train an object detection network without velocities using single-frame OBB labels, and then exploit the network's OBB predictions on unlabelled data for velocity training. In detail, the network's OBB predictions of the unlabelled frames are updated to the timestamp of a labelled frame using the predicted velocities and the distances between the updated OBBs of the unlabelled frame and the OBB predictions of the labelled frame are used to generate a self-supervised training signal for the velocities. The detection network architecture is extended by a module to account for the temporal relation of multiple scans and a module to represent the radars' radial velocity measurements explicitly. A two-step approach of first training only OBB detection, followed by training OBB detection and velocities is used. Further, a pre-training with pseudo-labels generated from radar radial velocity measurements bootstraps the self-supervised method of this paper. Experiments on the publicly available nuScenes dataset show that the proposed method almost reaches the velocity estimation performance of a fully supervised training, but does not require expensive velocity labels. Furthermore, we outperform a baseline method which uses only radial velocity measurements as labels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Understanding the Domain Gap in LiDAR Object Detection Networks

In order to make autonomous driving a reality, artificial neural networks have to work reliably in the open-world. However, the open-world is vast and continuously changing, so it is not technically feasible to collect and annotate training datasets which accurately represent this domain. Therefore, there are always domain gaps between training datasets and the open-world which must be understood. In this work, we investigate the domain gaps between high-resolution and low-resolution LiDAR sensors in object detection networks. Using a unique dataset, which enables us to study sensor resolution domain gaps independent of other effects, we show two distinct domain gaps - an inference domain gap and a training domain gap. The inference domain gap is characterised by a strong dependence on the number of LiDAR points per object, while the training gap shows no such dependence. These fndings show that different approaches are required to close these inference and training domain gaps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access